新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者ASCT后的维持治疗:单药与联合药物。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Enrica Antonia Martino, Ernesto Vigna, Caterina Labanca, Antonella Bruzzese, Francesco Mendicino, Giulio Caridà, Eugenio Lucia, Virginia Olivito, Noemi Puccio, Nicola Amodio, Antonino Neri, Fortunato Morabito, Massimo Gentile
{"title":"新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者ASCT后的维持治疗:单药与联合药物。","authors":"Enrica Antonia Martino, Ernesto Vigna, Caterina Labanca, Antonella Bruzzese, Francesco Mendicino, Giulio Caridà, Eugenio Lucia, Virginia Olivito, Noemi Puccio, Nicola Amodio, Antonino Neri, Fortunato Morabito, Massimo Gentile","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2525457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintenance therapy plays a crucial role in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival in multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide remains the gold standard, as demonstrated in phase 3 trials, consistently showing superior survival compared to observation or placebo. However, both established and novel agents - such as thalidomide and pomalidomide, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), monoclonal antibodies (moAbs), and bispecific antibodies - have been investigated as alternatives to assess their efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review delivers a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of maintenance strategies in MM and presents the available evidence supporting the efficacy of novel agents, both as monotherapy and in combination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Maintenance therapy is a critical component of MM management, capable of improving disease control and survival. Lenalidomide has demonstrated its ability to extend patients' survival, but cumulative toxicity remains a significant concern. For high-risk patients, maintenance therapy with PIs and CD38-targeting moAbs has proven to improve outcomes. However, challenges such as quality of life, cost, accessibility, and treatment resistance persist. A minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted maintenance strategy is desirable, particularly to enable personalized treatment approaches in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance therapy after ASCT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: single agent <i>versus</i> combination drugs.\",\"authors\":\"Enrica Antonia Martino, Ernesto Vigna, Caterina Labanca, Antonella Bruzzese, Francesco Mendicino, Giulio Caridà, Eugenio Lucia, Virginia Olivito, Noemi Puccio, Nicola Amodio, Antonino Neri, Fortunato Morabito, Massimo Gentile\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474086.2025.2525457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintenance therapy plays a crucial role in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival in multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide remains the gold standard, as demonstrated in phase 3 trials, consistently showing superior survival compared to observation or placebo. However, both established and novel agents - such as thalidomide and pomalidomide, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), monoclonal antibodies (moAbs), and bispecific antibodies - have been investigated as alternatives to assess their efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review delivers a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of maintenance strategies in MM and presents the available evidence supporting the efficacy of novel agents, both as monotherapy and in combination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Maintenance therapy is a critical component of MM management, capable of improving disease control and survival. Lenalidomide has demonstrated its ability to extend patients' survival, but cumulative toxicity remains a significant concern. For high-risk patients, maintenance therapy with PIs and CD38-targeting moAbs has proven to improve outcomes. However, challenges such as quality of life, cost, accessibility, and treatment resistance persist. A minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted maintenance strategy is desirable, particularly to enable personalized treatment approaches in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2525457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2525457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:维持治疗在延长多发性骨髓瘤的无进展生存期和总生存期方面起着至关重要的作用。来那度胺仍然是金标准,正如3期试验所证明的那样,与观察或安慰剂相比,它始终显示出更高的生存期。然而,已经建立的和新的药物-如沙利度胺和泊马度胺,蛋白酶体抑制剂(pi),单克隆抗体(moAbs)和双特异性抗体-已经被研究作为评估其有效性和安全性的替代方案。涵盖领域:本综述对MM维持策略的现状进行了全面分析,并提出了支持新药物疗效的现有证据,无论是单一治疗还是联合治疗。专家意见:维持治疗是MM管理的关键组成部分,能够改善疾病控制和生存率。来那度胺已证明其延长患者生存的能力,但累积毒性仍然是一个重大问题。对于高危患者,PIs和靶向cd38的moAbs维持治疗已被证明可改善预后。然而,诸如生活质量、费用、可及性和治疗耐药性等挑战仍然存在。最小残留病(MRD)适应的维持策略是可取的,特别是在临床实践中实现个性化治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintenance therapy after ASCT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: single agent versus combination drugs.

Introduction: Maintenance therapy plays a crucial role in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival in multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide remains the gold standard, as demonstrated in phase 3 trials, consistently showing superior survival compared to observation or placebo. However, both established and novel agents - such as thalidomide and pomalidomide, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), monoclonal antibodies (moAbs), and bispecific antibodies - have been investigated as alternatives to assess their efficacy and safety.

Areas covered: This review delivers a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of maintenance strategies in MM and presents the available evidence supporting the efficacy of novel agents, both as monotherapy and in combination.

Expert opinion: Maintenance therapy is a critical component of MM management, capable of improving disease control and survival. Lenalidomide has demonstrated its ability to extend patients' survival, but cumulative toxicity remains a significant concern. For high-risk patients, maintenance therapy with PIs and CD38-targeting moAbs has proven to improve outcomes. However, challenges such as quality of life, cost, accessibility, and treatment resistance persist. A minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted maintenance strategy is desirable, particularly to enable personalized treatment approaches in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信