治疗严重哮喘的生物制剂:解读什么对患者最好。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Mario Cazzola, Nicola A Hanania, Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani
{"title":"治疗严重哮喘的生物制剂:解读什么对患者最好。","authors":"Mario Cazzola, Nicola A Hanania, Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Choosing the right biologic for the right patient is challenging. It requires evaluating patient characteristics and disease manifestations, understanding the scientific evidence supporting each biologic's efficacy and safety, and using a shared decision-making strategy with the patient.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, in this narrative review we explore the latest approaches on the optimal selection of biologics in severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Biologics target different inflammatory pathways. The choice of biologic depends on biomarker profiles, clinical phenotype and endotype of the disease and its associated comorbidities. A structured approach using biomarkers is essential to guide personalized treatment decisions. Exacerbation history, corticosteroid dependence, and comorbidities all influence therapeutic selection. Asthma is challenging to treat because it is heterogeneous, symptoms change over time and biomarkers lack precision. Researchers are recognizing the need for combination biologic therapy and improved biomarker-driven strategies. However, biologic selection is complex due to overlapping inflammatory pathways and variable treatment response. Emerging strategies, including multi-biomarker panels, multi-omics approaches, and machine learning-driven decision making, aim to refine asthma phenotyping/endotyping and thus optimize treatment outcomes. Real-world studies, pragmatic clinical trials, and head-to-head comparisons of biologics are key to advancing precision medicine and improving long-term asthma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biologics for severe asthma: deciphering what is best for the patient.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Cazzola, Nicola A Hanania, Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Choosing the right biologic for the right patient is challenging. It requires evaluating patient characteristics and disease manifestations, understanding the scientific evidence supporting each biologic's efficacy and safety, and using a shared decision-making strategy with the patient.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, in this narrative review we explore the latest approaches on the optimal selection of biologics in severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Biologics target different inflammatory pathways. The choice of biologic depends on biomarker profiles, clinical phenotype and endotype of the disease and its associated comorbidities. A structured approach using biomarkers is essential to guide personalized treatment decisions. Exacerbation history, corticosteroid dependence, and comorbidities all influence therapeutic selection. Asthma is challenging to treat because it is heterogeneous, symptoms change over time and biomarkers lack precision. Researchers are recognizing the need for combination biologic therapy and improved biomarker-driven strategies. However, biologic selection is complex due to overlapping inflammatory pathways and variable treatment response. Emerging strategies, including multi-biomarker panels, multi-omics approaches, and machine learning-driven decision making, aim to refine asthma phenotyping/endotyping and thus optimize treatment outcomes. Real-world studies, pragmatic clinical trials, and head-to-head comparisons of biologics are key to advancing precision medicine and improving long-term asthma management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为合适的患者选择合适的生物制剂是一项挑战。它需要评估患者的特征和疾病表现,了解支持每种生物制剂的有效性和安全性的科学证据,并与患者采用共同的决策策略。涵盖领域:基于对文献的全面回顾,在这篇叙述性回顾中,我们探讨了重度哮喘生物制剂最佳选择的最新方法。专家意见:生物制剂针对不同的炎症途径。生物制剂的选择取决于生物标志物、临床表型和疾病的内源性及其相关合并症。使用生物标志物的结构化方法对于指导个性化治疗决策至关重要。加重史、皮质类固醇依赖和合并症都会影响治疗选择。哮喘的治疗具有挑战性,因为它是异质性的,症状会随着时间的推移而变化,生物标志物缺乏准确性。研究人员正在认识到联合生物治疗和改进生物标志物驱动策略的必要性。然而,由于炎症途径的重叠和治疗反应的变化,生物选择是复杂的。新兴策略,包括多生物标志物小组、多组学方法和机器学习驱动的决策,旨在改进哮喘表型/内分型,从而优化治疗结果。现实世界的研究、实用的临床试验和生物制剂的正面比较是推进精准医学和改善长期哮喘管理的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biologics for severe asthma: deciphering what is best for the patient.

Introduction: Choosing the right biologic for the right patient is challenging. It requires evaluating patient characteristics and disease manifestations, understanding the scientific evidence supporting each biologic's efficacy and safety, and using a shared decision-making strategy with the patient.

Areas covered: Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, in this narrative review we explore the latest approaches on the optimal selection of biologics in severe asthma.

Expert opinion: Biologics target different inflammatory pathways. The choice of biologic depends on biomarker profiles, clinical phenotype and endotype of the disease and its associated comorbidities. A structured approach using biomarkers is essential to guide personalized treatment decisions. Exacerbation history, corticosteroid dependence, and comorbidities all influence therapeutic selection. Asthma is challenging to treat because it is heterogeneous, symptoms change over time and biomarkers lack precision. Researchers are recognizing the need for combination biologic therapy and improved biomarker-driven strategies. However, biologic selection is complex due to overlapping inflammatory pathways and variable treatment response. Emerging strategies, including multi-biomarker panels, multi-omics approaches, and machine learning-driven decision making, aim to refine asthma phenotyping/endotyping and thus optimize treatment outcomes. Real-world studies, pragmatic clinical trials, and head-to-head comparisons of biologics are key to advancing precision medicine and improving long-term asthma management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology. Articles focus on the following key areas: • Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines • Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents • New diagnostic approaches • Screening and patient stratification • Pharmacoeconomic studies • New therapeutic indications for existing therapies • Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction • Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval • Novel treatment strategies • Epidemiological studies • Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信