Mario Cazzola, Nicola A Hanania, Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani
{"title":"治疗严重哮喘的生物制剂:解读什么对患者最好。","authors":"Mario Cazzola, Nicola A Hanania, Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Choosing the right biologic for the right patient is challenging. It requires evaluating patient characteristics and disease manifestations, understanding the scientific evidence supporting each biologic's efficacy and safety, and using a shared decision-making strategy with the patient.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, in this narrative review we explore the latest approaches on the optimal selection of biologics in severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Biologics target different inflammatory pathways. The choice of biologic depends on biomarker profiles, clinical phenotype and endotype of the disease and its associated comorbidities. A structured approach using biomarkers is essential to guide personalized treatment decisions. Exacerbation history, corticosteroid dependence, and comorbidities all influence therapeutic selection. Asthma is challenging to treat because it is heterogeneous, symptoms change over time and biomarkers lack precision. Researchers are recognizing the need for combination biologic therapy and improved biomarker-driven strategies. However, biologic selection is complex due to overlapping inflammatory pathways and variable treatment response. Emerging strategies, including multi-biomarker panels, multi-omics approaches, and machine learning-driven decision making, aim to refine asthma phenotyping/endotyping and thus optimize treatment outcomes. Real-world studies, pragmatic clinical trials, and head-to-head comparisons of biologics are key to advancing precision medicine and improving long-term asthma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biologics for severe asthma: deciphering what is best for the patient.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Cazzola, Nicola A Hanania, Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Choosing the right biologic for the right patient is challenging. It requires evaluating patient characteristics and disease manifestations, understanding the scientific evidence supporting each biologic's efficacy and safety, and using a shared decision-making strategy with the patient.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, in this narrative review we explore the latest approaches on the optimal selection of biologics in severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Biologics target different inflammatory pathways. The choice of biologic depends on biomarker profiles, clinical phenotype and endotype of the disease and its associated comorbidities. A structured approach using biomarkers is essential to guide personalized treatment decisions. Exacerbation history, corticosteroid dependence, and comorbidities all influence therapeutic selection. Asthma is challenging to treat because it is heterogeneous, symptoms change over time and biomarkers lack precision. Researchers are recognizing the need for combination biologic therapy and improved biomarker-driven strategies. However, biologic selection is complex due to overlapping inflammatory pathways and variable treatment response. Emerging strategies, including multi-biomarker panels, multi-omics approaches, and machine learning-driven decision making, aim to refine asthma phenotyping/endotyping and thus optimize treatment outcomes. Real-world studies, pragmatic clinical trials, and head-to-head comparisons of biologics are key to advancing precision medicine and improving long-term asthma management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2525443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biologics for severe asthma: deciphering what is best for the patient.
Introduction: Choosing the right biologic for the right patient is challenging. It requires evaluating patient characteristics and disease manifestations, understanding the scientific evidence supporting each biologic's efficacy and safety, and using a shared decision-making strategy with the patient.
Areas covered: Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, in this narrative review we explore the latest approaches on the optimal selection of biologics in severe asthma.
Expert opinion: Biologics target different inflammatory pathways. The choice of biologic depends on biomarker profiles, clinical phenotype and endotype of the disease and its associated comorbidities. A structured approach using biomarkers is essential to guide personalized treatment decisions. Exacerbation history, corticosteroid dependence, and comorbidities all influence therapeutic selection. Asthma is challenging to treat because it is heterogeneous, symptoms change over time and biomarkers lack precision. Researchers are recognizing the need for combination biologic therapy and improved biomarker-driven strategies. However, biologic selection is complex due to overlapping inflammatory pathways and variable treatment response. Emerging strategies, including multi-biomarker panels, multi-omics approaches, and machine learning-driven decision making, aim to refine asthma phenotyping/endotyping and thus optimize treatment outcomes. Real-world studies, pragmatic clinical trials, and head-to-head comparisons of biologics are key to advancing precision medicine and improving long-term asthma management.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.