后续生物制剂的临床和经济价值:生物类似药、生物改良药和生物平行药。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-25 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.1036
Ivo Abraham, Ansam Nail Beddor, Karen Michelle MacDonald
{"title":"后续生物制剂的临床和经济价值:生物类似药、生物改良药和生物平行药。","authors":"Ivo Abraham, Ansam Nail Beddor, Karen Michelle MacDonald","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advent of biosimilars into the market of biologic treatments less than 20 years ago in Europe and about 10 years ago in the United States heralded a period of rapid and profound changes in biological therapies. While biosimilars where the first disruptors to the biologics market and some lingering concerns have been addressed, they have since been joined by biobetters and bioparallels in a powerful aggregate of follow-on biologics (FOB) competing with originators biologics. Biobetters are drugs derived from existing biological agents, either by design or by coincidence, with improved pharmacological properties or outcomes. Bioparallels are distinct biologic agents in established classes of biological therapeutics (for instance, Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors) that mainly compete on price without the burden of demonstrating equivalence in efficacy and safety. Lingering clinical concerns about biosimilars have been addressed. The economic dynamics of a biologics market that includes lower-priced FOBs continues to be demonstrated, especially how the cost-efficiencies from treatment with FOBs enable expanded patient access to and patient equity in biological therapy on a budget-neutral basis. However, this must be considered within a broader context of potential excess FOB capacity in countries with relatively well-funded healthcare systems, the commoditization of FOBs, and associated downward pricing pressures. Positively, however, is how this excess FOB capacity can be parlayed into increased access to biological therapeutics in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 6","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical and Economic Value of Follow-on Biologics: Biosimilars, Biobetters, and Bioparallels.\",\"authors\":\"Ivo Abraham, Ansam Nail Beddor, Karen Michelle MacDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/hmed.2024.1036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The advent of biosimilars into the market of biologic treatments less than 20 years ago in Europe and about 10 years ago in the United States heralded a period of rapid and profound changes in biological therapies. While biosimilars where the first disruptors to the biologics market and some lingering concerns have been addressed, they have since been joined by biobetters and bioparallels in a powerful aggregate of follow-on biologics (FOB) competing with originators biologics. Biobetters are drugs derived from existing biological agents, either by design or by coincidence, with improved pharmacological properties or outcomes. Bioparallels are distinct biologic agents in established classes of biological therapeutics (for instance, Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors) that mainly compete on price without the burden of demonstrating equivalence in efficacy and safety. Lingering clinical concerns about biosimilars have been addressed. The economic dynamics of a biologics market that includes lower-priced FOBs continues to be demonstrated, especially how the cost-efficiencies from treatment with FOBs enable expanded patient access to and patient equity in biological therapy on a budget-neutral basis. However, this must be considered within a broader context of potential excess FOB capacity in countries with relatively well-funded healthcare systems, the commoditization of FOBs, and associated downward pricing pressures. Positively, however, is how this excess FOB capacity can be parlayed into increased access to biological therapeutics in low- and middle-income countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"86 6\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.1036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.1036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物仿制药进入生物治疗市场不到20年前在欧洲出现,大约10年前在美国出现,预示着生物治疗快速而深刻的变化时期。虽然生物仿制药是生物制剂市场的第一个颠覆者,一些挥之不去的担忧已经得到解决,但此后,生物改良药和生物仿制药也加入了它们的行列,形成了一个强大的后续生物制剂(FOB)群体,与原始生物制剂竞争。生物改良剂是由现有生物制剂衍生而来的药物,通过设计或巧合,具有改进的药理学特性或结果。生物平行药是现有生物治疗药物(例如程序性死亡1 (PD-1)抑制剂)中独特的生物制剂,主要是在价格上竞争,而无需证明其疗效和安全性相当。对生物仿制药的临床担忧已经得到解决。包括低价外源性药物在内的生物制剂市场的经济动态继续得到证明,特别是外源性药物治疗的成本效益如何在预算中立的基础上扩大患者获得生物治疗的机会和患者公平。然而,必须在更广泛的背景下考虑这一点,即在医疗系统资金相对充足的国家,离岸价格可能过剩,离岸价格商品化,以及相关的价格下行压力。然而,积极的一面是,这种过剩的离岸价能力可以在低收入和中等收入国家增加获得生物治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Clinical and Economic Value of Follow-on Biologics: Biosimilars, Biobetters, and Bioparallels.

The advent of biosimilars into the market of biologic treatments less than 20 years ago in Europe and about 10 years ago in the United States heralded a period of rapid and profound changes in biological therapies. While biosimilars where the first disruptors to the biologics market and some lingering concerns have been addressed, they have since been joined by biobetters and bioparallels in a powerful aggregate of follow-on biologics (FOB) competing with originators biologics. Biobetters are drugs derived from existing biological agents, either by design or by coincidence, with improved pharmacological properties or outcomes. Bioparallels are distinct biologic agents in established classes of biological therapeutics (for instance, Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors) that mainly compete on price without the burden of demonstrating equivalence in efficacy and safety. Lingering clinical concerns about biosimilars have been addressed. The economic dynamics of a biologics market that includes lower-priced FOBs continues to be demonstrated, especially how the cost-efficiencies from treatment with FOBs enable expanded patient access to and patient equity in biological therapy on a budget-neutral basis. However, this must be considered within a broader context of potential excess FOB capacity in countries with relatively well-funded healthcare systems, the commoditization of FOBs, and associated downward pricing pressures. Positively, however, is how this excess FOB capacity can be parlayed into increased access to biological therapeutics in low- and middle-income countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信