卡维地洛在肝硬化患者中的死亡率低于其他非选择性β受体阻滞剂。

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2025.2491220
Michael J Mullarkey, Gerald O Ogola, Sumeet K Asrani, Michael L Volk
{"title":"卡维地洛在肝硬化患者中的死亡率低于其他非选择性β受体阻滞剂。","authors":"Michael J Mullarkey, Gerald O Ogola, Sumeet K Asrani, Michael L Volk","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2491220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent guidelines have suggested that carvedilol should be first-line treatment in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This recommendation is based on data that rely on clinically impractical surrogates such as hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements. There is limited head-to-head data comparing carvedilol to other nonselective beta-blockers in the real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study from a large health system compared patients with cirrhosis determined by ICD-10 algorithm and platelet count <150, who were treated with carvedilol versus nadolol or propranolol. Outcomes including hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleeding) and all-cause mortality were analyzed with adjustment for potential confounding using propensity score matching and time-dependent Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2302 cirrhosis patients meeting inclusion criteria, 1629 (70.8%) were on carvedilol and 673 (29.2%) were on nadolol or propranolol. In risk-adjusted analysis, patients on carvedilol had a lower hazard of hepatic decompensation (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and lower hazard of mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.03) compared to patients on propranolol/nadolol. The superiority of carvedilol applied equally to each decompensation type: ascites, encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the use of carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis and clinically apparent portal hypertension, to decrease the risk of hepatic decompensation and improve survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 4","pages":"412-418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carvedilol is associated with lower mortality than other nonselective beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Mullarkey, Gerald O Ogola, Sumeet K Asrani, Michael L Volk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2025.2491220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent guidelines have suggested that carvedilol should be first-line treatment in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This recommendation is based on data that rely on clinically impractical surrogates such as hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements. There is limited head-to-head data comparing carvedilol to other nonselective beta-blockers in the real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study from a large health system compared patients with cirrhosis determined by ICD-10 algorithm and platelet count <150, who were treated with carvedilol versus nadolol or propranolol. Outcomes including hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleeding) and all-cause mortality were analyzed with adjustment for potential confounding using propensity score matching and time-dependent Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2302 cirrhosis patients meeting inclusion criteria, 1629 (70.8%) were on carvedilol and 673 (29.2%) were on nadolol or propranolol. In risk-adjusted analysis, patients on carvedilol had a lower hazard of hepatic decompensation (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and lower hazard of mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.03) compared to patients on propranolol/nadolol. The superiority of carvedilol applied equally to each decompensation type: ascites, encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the use of carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis and clinically apparent portal hypertension, to decrease the risk of hepatic decompensation and improve survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"412-418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2491220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2491220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的指南建议卡维地洛应作为肝硬化和门静脉高压症患者的一线治疗。这一建议是基于依赖于临床不切实际的替代数据,如肝静脉压力梯度测量。在现实环境中,卡维地洛与其他非选择性β受体阻滞剂的正面对比数据有限。方法:采用回顾性病例对照研究,比较某大型卫生系统采用ICD-10算法诊断的肝硬化患者与血小板计数结果。结果:在符合纳入标准的2302例肝硬化患者中,卡维地洛患者1629例(70.8%),纳多洛尔或普萘洛尔患者673例(29.2%)。在风险调整分析中,卡维地洛组患者发生肝失代偿的风险较普萘洛尔/纳多洛尔组患者低(P P = 0.03)。卡维地洛的优越性同样适用于每一种失代偿类型:腹水、脑病和静脉曲张出血。结论:这些结果支持卡维地洛用于肝硬化和临床明显门静脉高压症患者,可降低肝功能失代偿的风险,提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carvedilol is associated with lower mortality than other nonselective beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis.

Background: Recent guidelines have suggested that carvedilol should be first-line treatment in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This recommendation is based on data that rely on clinically impractical surrogates such as hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements. There is limited head-to-head data comparing carvedilol to other nonselective beta-blockers in the real-world setting.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study from a large health system compared patients with cirrhosis determined by ICD-10 algorithm and platelet count <150, who were treated with carvedilol versus nadolol or propranolol. Outcomes including hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleeding) and all-cause mortality were analyzed with adjustment for potential confounding using propensity score matching and time-dependent Cox regression.

Results: Among the 2302 cirrhosis patients meeting inclusion criteria, 1629 (70.8%) were on carvedilol and 673 (29.2%) were on nadolol or propranolol. In risk-adjusted analysis, patients on carvedilol had a lower hazard of hepatic decompensation (P < 0.001) and lower hazard of mortality (P = 0.03) compared to patients on propranolol/nadolol. The superiority of carvedilol applied equally to each decompensation type: ascites, encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding.

Conclusion: These findings support the use of carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis and clinically apparent portal hypertension, to decrease the risk of hepatic decompensation and improve survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信