评估有机物,有机污染物和大肠杆菌(大肠杆菌)在生物炭改性生物过滤器中的同时保留率†

IF 3.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Johanna Jernberg, Tadele Haile and Bridget Ulrich
{"title":"评估有机物,有机污染物和大肠杆菌(大肠杆菌)在生物炭改性生物过滤器中的同时保留率†","authors":"Johanna Jernberg, Tadele Haile and Bridget Ulrich","doi":"10.1039/D4EW01025F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Though organic contaminants and <em>Escherichia coli</em> (<em>E. coli</em>) are very different contaminants, both are ubiquitous in urban runoff, susceptible to passing through conventional biofilters, and interact with high-temperature biochars primarily <em>via</em> hydrophobic interactions. However, limited information is available regarding their simultaneous retention in biochar-amended filtration systems, which was evaluated here <em>via</em> intermittently dosed column tests. Columns amended with commercial biochar (ABC-biochar or WF-biochar) were compared to sand-only controls over treatment of 100 empty bed volumes (EBVs) of creek water, which was augmented with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and organic contaminants, as well as <em>E. coli</em> during three loading periods. While both biochars demonstrated similar DOC removal, effluents from ABC-biochar columns showed reduced specific ultraviolet absorption (SUVA) and improved organic contaminant retention relative to sand-only and WF-biochar columns. However, biochar-amended filters showed limited improvement in <em>E. coli</em> retention, as sand-only and biochar-amended columns demonstrated up to 1.0 ± 0.5 and 1.4 ± 0.4 log-removal of <em>E. coli</em>, respectively. <em>E. coli</em> log-removal for all columns was reduced to 0.5 ± 0.1 following a freeze–thaw cycle. Drainage rates for ABC-biochar columns were on average approximately 50% higher than the other columns, demonstrating the importance of considering hydraulic conditions when assessing overall filtration performance. Our findings warrant more rigorous validation of the effects of biochar amendment on filtration performance under environmentally relevant conditions and at the field scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 7","pages":" 1733-1744"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the simultaneous retention of organic matter, organic contaminants, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in biochar-amended biofilters†\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Jernberg, Tadele Haile and Bridget Ulrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4EW01025F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Though organic contaminants and <em>Escherichia coli</em> (<em>E. coli</em>) are very different contaminants, both are ubiquitous in urban runoff, susceptible to passing through conventional biofilters, and interact with high-temperature biochars primarily <em>via</em> hydrophobic interactions. However, limited information is available regarding their simultaneous retention in biochar-amended filtration systems, which was evaluated here <em>via</em> intermittently dosed column tests. Columns amended with commercial biochar (ABC-biochar or WF-biochar) were compared to sand-only controls over treatment of 100 empty bed volumes (EBVs) of creek water, which was augmented with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and organic contaminants, as well as <em>E. coli</em> during three loading periods. While both biochars demonstrated similar DOC removal, effluents from ABC-biochar columns showed reduced specific ultraviolet absorption (SUVA) and improved organic contaminant retention relative to sand-only and WF-biochar columns. However, biochar-amended filters showed limited improvement in <em>E. coli</em> retention, as sand-only and biochar-amended columns demonstrated up to 1.0 ± 0.5 and 1.4 ± 0.4 log-removal of <em>E. coli</em>, respectively. <em>E. coli</em> log-removal for all columns was reduced to 0.5 ± 0.1 following a freeze–thaw cycle. Drainage rates for ABC-biochar columns were on average approximately 50% higher than the other columns, demonstrating the importance of considering hydraulic conditions when assessing overall filtration performance. Our findings warrant more rigorous validation of the effects of biochar amendment on filtration performance under environmentally relevant conditions and at the field scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\" 1733-1744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ew/d4ew01025f\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ew/d4ew01025f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有机污染物和大肠杆菌(E. coli)是非常不同的污染物,但两者在城市径流中无处不在,容易通过传统的生物过滤器,并主要通过疏水相互作用与高温生物炭相互作用。然而,关于它们在生物炭改性过滤系统中同时保留的信息有限,本文通过间歇给药柱试验对其进行了评估。用商业生物炭(abc -生物炭或wf -生物炭)改性的色谱柱与纯砂对照进行了比较,并在三个加载期对100个空床体积(EBVs)的小溪水进行了处理,其中增加了溶解有机碳(DOC)和有机污染物,以及大肠杆菌。虽然两种生物炭对DOC的去除效果相似,但与纯砂和wf生物炭柱相比,abc生物炭柱的出水紫外线吸收(SUVA)降低,有机污染物滞留率提高。然而,生物炭修饰的过滤器对大肠杆菌保留的改善有限,因为纯砂和生物炭修饰的柱分别显示大肠杆菌的对数去除量为1.0±0.5和1.4±0.4。冻融循环后,所有柱的大肠杆菌去除率降至0.5±0.1。abc -生物炭柱的排水率平均比其他柱高出约50%,这表明在评估整体过滤性能时考虑水力条件的重要性。我们的研究结果保证在环境相关条件下和在现场规模上对生物炭改性对过滤性能的影响进行更严格的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the simultaneous retention of organic matter, organic contaminants, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in biochar-amended biofilters†

Evaluating the simultaneous retention of organic matter, organic contaminants, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in biochar-amended biofilters†

Though organic contaminants and Escherichia coli (E. coli) are very different contaminants, both are ubiquitous in urban runoff, susceptible to passing through conventional biofilters, and interact with high-temperature biochars primarily via hydrophobic interactions. However, limited information is available regarding their simultaneous retention in biochar-amended filtration systems, which was evaluated here via intermittently dosed column tests. Columns amended with commercial biochar (ABC-biochar or WF-biochar) were compared to sand-only controls over treatment of 100 empty bed volumes (EBVs) of creek water, which was augmented with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and organic contaminants, as well as E. coli during three loading periods. While both biochars demonstrated similar DOC removal, effluents from ABC-biochar columns showed reduced specific ultraviolet absorption (SUVA) and improved organic contaminant retention relative to sand-only and WF-biochar columns. However, biochar-amended filters showed limited improvement in E. coli retention, as sand-only and biochar-amended columns demonstrated up to 1.0 ± 0.5 and 1.4 ± 0.4 log-removal of E. coli, respectively. E. coli log-removal for all columns was reduced to 0.5 ± 0.1 following a freeze–thaw cycle. Drainage rates for ABC-biochar columns were on average approximately 50% higher than the other columns, demonstrating the importance of considering hydraulic conditions when assessing overall filtration performance. Our findings warrant more rigorous validation of the effects of biochar amendment on filtration performance under environmentally relevant conditions and at the field scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信