Sing Chee Tan FCICM, MMed(ClinEpi), MIS(Health), MBBS(Hons) , Lucy Modra FCICM, MPH, MBBS(Hons) , Tamishta Hensman FCICM, MBBS
{"title":"日常密集主义者的人工智能伦理","authors":"Sing Chee Tan FCICM, MMed(ClinEpi), MIS(Health), MBBS(Hons) , Lucy Modra FCICM, MPH, MBBS(Hons) , Tamishta Hensman FCICM, MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Australian intensive care units (ICUs), Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to enhance efficiency and improve patient outcomes. However, ethical concerns surrounding AI must be addressed before widespread adoption. We examine the ethical challenges of of AI using the framework of the four pillars of biomedical ethics—beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, and discuss the need for a fifth pillar of explicability. We consider the risks of perpetuating inequities, privacy breaches, and unintended harms, particularly in disadvantaged populations such as First Nations people. We advocate for a national strategy for ICUs to guide the ethical implementation of AI, that aligns with existing National AI Frameworks. Our recommendations for implementation of safe and ethical AI in ICU include education, developing guidelines, and ensuring transparency in AI decision-making. A coordinated strategy is essential to balance AI’s benefits with the ethical responsibility to protect patients and healthcare providers in critical care settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"27 2","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI ethics for the everyday intensivist\",\"authors\":\"Sing Chee Tan FCICM, MMed(ClinEpi), MIS(Health), MBBS(Hons) , Lucy Modra FCICM, MPH, MBBS(Hons) , Tamishta Hensman FCICM, MBBS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In Australian intensive care units (ICUs), Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to enhance efficiency and improve patient outcomes. However, ethical concerns surrounding AI must be addressed before widespread adoption. We examine the ethical challenges of of AI using the framework of the four pillars of biomedical ethics—beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, and discuss the need for a fifth pillar of explicability. We consider the risks of perpetuating inequities, privacy breaches, and unintended harms, particularly in disadvantaged populations such as First Nations people. We advocate for a national strategy for ICUs to guide the ethical implementation of AI, that aligns with existing National AI Frameworks. Our recommendations for implementation of safe and ethical AI in ICU include education, developing guidelines, and ensuring transparency in AI decision-making. A coordinated strategy is essential to balance AI’s benefits with the ethical responsibility to protect patients and healthcare providers in critical care settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277225000195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277225000195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Australian intensive care units (ICUs), Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to enhance efficiency and improve patient outcomes. However, ethical concerns surrounding AI must be addressed before widespread adoption. We examine the ethical challenges of of AI using the framework of the four pillars of biomedical ethics—beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, and discuss the need for a fifth pillar of explicability. We consider the risks of perpetuating inequities, privacy breaches, and unintended harms, particularly in disadvantaged populations such as First Nations people. We advocate for a national strategy for ICUs to guide the ethical implementation of AI, that aligns with existing National AI Frameworks. Our recommendations for implementation of safe and ethical AI in ICU include education, developing guidelines, and ensuring transparency in AI decision-making. A coordinated strategy is essential to balance AI’s benefits with the ethical responsibility to protect patients and healthcare providers in critical care settings.
期刊介绍:
ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines.
The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world.
The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.