David Hong , Seung Hun Lee , Jihye Heo , Doosup Shin , Juhee Cho , Eliseo Guallar , Hyun Sung Joh , Hyun Kuk Kim , Junho Ha , Ki Hong Choi , Taek Kyu Park , Jeong Hoon Yang , Young Bin Song , Joo-Yong Hahn , Seung-Hyuk Choi , Hyeon-Cheol Gwon , Danbee Kang , Joo Myung Lee
{"title":"抗血小板治疗中期冠状动脉狭窄和延迟再血管造影患者的安全性和有效性","authors":"David Hong , Seung Hun Lee , Jihye Heo , Doosup Shin , Juhee Cho , Eliseo Guallar , Hyun Sung Joh , Hyun Kuk Kim , Junho Ha , Ki Hong Choi , Taek Kyu Park , Jeong Hoon Yang , Young Bin Song , Joo-Yong Hahn , Seung-Hyuk Choi , Hyeon-Cheol Gwon , Danbee Kang , Joo Myung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.recesp.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>This study investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their fractional flow reserve (FFR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4657 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR were identified from 2013 to 2020. FFR was indicated in patients with no prior evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50%-70%) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to whether antiplatelet therapy was initiated after the index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during a 5-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After propensity score matching, there were 1634 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group and 1634 in the nonantiplatelet therapy group. The risk of MACCE was similar between the 2 groups (24.8% vs 24.7%; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.84-1.13; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.745). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in the antiplatelet therapy group than in the nonantiplatelet therapy group (2.2% vs 1.2%; aHR, 2.07; 95%CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were similar in subgroup analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR, antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding without reducing the risk of future ischemic events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21299,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de cardiologia","volume":"78 7","pages":"Pages 580-589"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seguridad y eficacia del tratamiento antiplaquetario en pacientes con estenosis coronaria intermedia y revascularización diferida\",\"authors\":\"David Hong , Seung Hun Lee , Jihye Heo , Doosup Shin , Juhee Cho , Eliseo Guallar , Hyun Sung Joh , Hyun Kuk Kim , Junho Ha , Ki Hong Choi , Taek Kyu Park , Jeong Hoon Yang , Young Bin Song , Joo-Yong Hahn , Seung-Hyuk Choi , Hyeon-Cheol Gwon , Danbee Kang , Joo Myung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recesp.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>This study investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their fractional flow reserve (FFR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4657 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR were identified from 2013 to 2020. FFR was indicated in patients with no prior evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50%-70%) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to whether antiplatelet therapy was initiated after the index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during a 5-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After propensity score matching, there were 1634 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group and 1634 in the nonantiplatelet therapy group. The risk of MACCE was similar between the 2 groups (24.8% vs 24.7%; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.84-1.13; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.745). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in the antiplatelet therapy group than in the nonantiplatelet therapy group (2.2% vs 1.2%; aHR, 2.07; 95%CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were similar in subgroup analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR, antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding without reducing the risk of future ischemic events.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"78 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 580-589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300893224004573\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300893224004573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究探讨了抗血小板治疗中度冠状动脉狭窄患者的安全性和有效性,这些患者由于其血流储备分数(FFR)而延迟血运重建术。方法采用韩国国民健康保险公团数据库进行全国队列研究。2013年至2020年共发现4657例因FFR而接受延迟血运重建术的中度冠状动脉狭窄患者。经定量冠状动脉造影确定无心肌缺血和中度冠状动脉狭窄(50%-70%)证据的患者适用FFR。根据指标手术后是否开始抗血小板治疗对患者进行分类。主要疗效指标为5年随访期间的主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE),包括全因死亡、心肌梗死、计划外血运重建术和卒中。主要的安全性指标是胃肠道出血。结果经倾向评分匹配,抗血小板治疗组1634例,非抗血小板治疗组1634例。两组间发生MACCE的风险相似(24.8% vs 24.7%;调整后的HR为0.97;95%置信区间,0.84 - -1.13;p = 0.745)。抗血小板治疗组发生胃肠道出血的风险高于非抗血小板治疗组(2.2% vs 1.2%;aHR, 2.07;95%可信区间,1.08 - -4.00)。这些结果在亚组分析中相似。结论中度冠状动脉狭窄患者因FFR延迟血运重建术,抗血小板治疗可能会增加胃肠道出血的风险,但不会降低未来缺血性事件的风险。
Seguridad y eficacia del tratamiento antiplaquetario en pacientes con estenosis coronaria intermedia y revascularización diferida
Introduction and objectives
This study investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Methods
A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4657 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR were identified from 2013 to 2020. FFR was indicated in patients with no prior evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50%-70%) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to whether antiplatelet therapy was initiated after the index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during a 5-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding.
Results
After propensity score matching, there were 1634 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group and 1634 in the nonantiplatelet therapy group. The risk of MACCE was similar between the 2 groups (24.8% vs 24.7%; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.84-1.13; P = 0.745). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in the antiplatelet therapy group than in the nonantiplatelet therapy group (2.2% vs 1.2%; aHR, 2.07; 95%CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were similar in subgroup analyses.
Conclusions
In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR, antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding without reducing the risk of future ischemic events.
期刊介绍:
Revista Española de Cardiología, Revista bilingüe científica internacional, dedicada a las enfermedades cardiovasculares, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología.