用于中观尺度蛋白质组学样品制备自动化的3D打印硬件

IF 4.1 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sadie R. Schultz , Matthew M. Champion
{"title":"用于中观尺度蛋白质组学样品制备自动化的3D打印硬件","authors":"Sadie R. Schultz ,&nbsp;Matthew M. Champion","doi":"10.1016/j.talo.2025.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is the dominant method for measuring peptides and proteins from complex mixtures. In bottom-up approaches, proteins are digested or proteolyzed prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. Peptides are fragmented, and proteins are inferred <em>via</em> peptide spectral matching (PSM). The throughput of this process is surprisingly low; a proteomics core facility might analyse &lt;20 samples/day per instrument using UHPLC-MS/MS. Because of this, automation in proteomics is rare, and virtually all preparation is performed by hand. We developed 3D printed hardware and automated sample preparation modules for a lower-cost Andrew Alliance pipetting robot. The robot operates on simple principles, using traditional pipettes and follows protocols closely resembling manual preparation. Here, we present modular protocols for the major techniques in proteomics preparation: in-solution and S-Trap digestion; Tip and solid-phase extraction (SPE) based desalting. Both approaches yield dense protein identifications from complex proteomes. Automated samples had high reproducibility: ∼60 % of proteins identified from in-solution and S-Trap digested samples had a measured CV of ≤20 %. In contrast, 52 % of in-solution digested and 63 % of S-Trap digested of proteins identified from manually prepared samples had CVs ≤20 %. Automated sample digestion and tip-based desalting had reduced ≅ 70 % and 40 % quantitative yield respectively compared to manual preparation according to the protein label-free quantification (LFQ). Increasing injection amount to normalize the yield restored protein and peptide identifications which demonstrates the differences between manual and automated methods were predominantly due to reduced recovery. Overall, automation of bottom-up proteomics sample preparation at the meso‑scale offers increased reproducibility in non sample-limited applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":436,"journal":{"name":"Talanta Open","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D printed hardware for automation of proteomics sample preparation at the Meso-Scale\",\"authors\":\"Sadie R. Schultz ,&nbsp;Matthew M. Champion\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.talo.2025.100505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is the dominant method for measuring peptides and proteins from complex mixtures. In bottom-up approaches, proteins are digested or proteolyzed prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. Peptides are fragmented, and proteins are inferred <em>via</em> peptide spectral matching (PSM). The throughput of this process is surprisingly low; a proteomics core facility might analyse &lt;20 samples/day per instrument using UHPLC-MS/MS. Because of this, automation in proteomics is rare, and virtually all preparation is performed by hand. We developed 3D printed hardware and automated sample preparation modules for a lower-cost Andrew Alliance pipetting robot. The robot operates on simple principles, using traditional pipettes and follows protocols closely resembling manual preparation. Here, we present modular protocols for the major techniques in proteomics preparation: in-solution and S-Trap digestion; Tip and solid-phase extraction (SPE) based desalting. Both approaches yield dense protein identifications from complex proteomes. Automated samples had high reproducibility: ∼60 % of proteins identified from in-solution and S-Trap digested samples had a measured CV of ≤20 %. In contrast, 52 % of in-solution digested and 63 % of S-Trap digested of proteins identified from manually prepared samples had CVs ≤20 %. Automated sample digestion and tip-based desalting had reduced ≅ 70 % and 40 % quantitative yield respectively compared to manual preparation according to the protein label-free quantification (LFQ). Increasing injection amount to normalize the yield restored protein and peptide identifications which demonstrates the differences between manual and automated methods were predominantly due to reduced recovery. Overall, automation of bottom-up proteomics sample preparation at the meso‑scale offers increased reproducibility in non sample-limited applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talanta Open\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talanta Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831925001079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831925001079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于质谱的蛋白质组学是测量复杂混合物中多肽和蛋白质的主要方法。在自下而上的方法中,蛋白质在LC-MS/MS分析之前被消化或蛋白水解。肽是碎片化的,通过肽谱匹配(PSM)推断出蛋白质。这个过程的吞吐量低得惊人;蛋白质组学核心设备可能使用UHPLC-MS/MS每天分析20个样品。正因为如此,蛋白质组学的自动化是罕见的,几乎所有的准备工作都是手工完成的。我们开发了3D打印硬件和自动化样品制备模块的低成本安德鲁联盟移液机器人。机器人的操作原理很简单,使用传统的移液器,并遵循与人工准备非常相似的规程。在这里,我们提出了蛋白质组学制备的主要技术的模块化方案:溶液中和S-Trap消化;尖端和固相萃取(SPE)脱盐。这两种方法都能从复杂的蛋白质组中获得密集的蛋白质鉴定。自动化样品具有高重复性:从溶液中和S-Trap消化样品中鉴定的蛋白质中,约60%的测量CV≤20%。相比之下,人工制备样品中鉴定的蛋白质,52%的溶液消化和63%的S-Trap消化的CVs≤20%。根据蛋白质无标签定量(LFQ),与人工制备相比,自动样品消化和基于尖端的脱盐分别降低了70%和40%的定量收率。增加注射量以使产量恢复正常,这表明手动和自动化方法之间的差异主要是由于回收率降低。总体而言,自动化自下而上的蛋白质组学样品制备在中尺度提供了增加的再现性,在非样品限制的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

3D printed hardware for automation of proteomics sample preparation at the Meso-Scale

3D printed hardware for automation of proteomics sample preparation at the Meso-Scale
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is the dominant method for measuring peptides and proteins from complex mixtures. In bottom-up approaches, proteins are digested or proteolyzed prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. Peptides are fragmented, and proteins are inferred via peptide spectral matching (PSM). The throughput of this process is surprisingly low; a proteomics core facility might analyse <20 samples/day per instrument using UHPLC-MS/MS. Because of this, automation in proteomics is rare, and virtually all preparation is performed by hand. We developed 3D printed hardware and automated sample preparation modules for a lower-cost Andrew Alliance pipetting robot. The robot operates on simple principles, using traditional pipettes and follows protocols closely resembling manual preparation. Here, we present modular protocols for the major techniques in proteomics preparation: in-solution and S-Trap digestion; Tip and solid-phase extraction (SPE) based desalting. Both approaches yield dense protein identifications from complex proteomes. Automated samples had high reproducibility: ∼60 % of proteins identified from in-solution and S-Trap digested samples had a measured CV of ≤20 %. In contrast, 52 % of in-solution digested and 63 % of S-Trap digested of proteins identified from manually prepared samples had CVs ≤20 %. Automated sample digestion and tip-based desalting had reduced ≅ 70 % and 40 % quantitative yield respectively compared to manual preparation according to the protein label-free quantification (LFQ). Increasing injection amount to normalize the yield restored protein and peptide identifications which demonstrates the differences between manual and automated methods were predominantly due to reduced recovery. Overall, automation of bottom-up proteomics sample preparation at the meso‑scale offers increased reproducibility in non sample-limited applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Talanta Open
Talanta Open Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信