Kristian B. Filion PhD , Tetiana Zolotarova MD , Andréa Hébert-Losier MSc , Sarah B. Windle MPH , Pauline Reynier MSc , Todd Greenspoon MD , Tim Brandys MD , Tamàs Fülöp MD , Thang Nguyen MD , Stéphane Elkouri MD , Igor Wilderman MD , Olivier F. Bertrand MD , Joanna Alexis Bostwick MD , Yves Lacasse MD , Smita Pakhale MD , Mark J. Eisenberg MD, MPH
{"title":"使用电子烟12周对戒烟1年的影响","authors":"Kristian B. Filion PhD , Tetiana Zolotarova MD , Andréa Hébert-Losier MSc , Sarah B. Windle MPH , Pauline Reynier MSc , Todd Greenspoon MD , Tim Brandys MD , Tamàs Fülöp MD , Thang Nguyen MD , Stéphane Elkouri MD , Igor Wilderman MD , Olivier F. Bertrand MD , Joanna Alexis Bostwick MD , Yves Lacasse MD , Smita Pakhale MD , Mark J. Eisenberg MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The current evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We randomized 376 adults who smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day and were motivated to quit at 17 Canadian sites to 12 weeks of nicotine (15 mg/mL) e-cigarettes (n = 128), non-nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121). All groups received individual counseling. The primary endpoint was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks. The 52-week follow-up results are reported here.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants (mean age 52 ± 13 years; 47% female) smoked a mean of 21 ± 11 cigarettes/day at baseline. Compared to individual counseling alone, participants randomized to nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling had higher rates of point prevalence (23.6% vs 9.9%; difference: 13.7%; 95% CI: 4.6%-22.8%) and continuous abstinence (3.1% vs 0.0%; difference: 3.1%; 95% CI: 0.1%-6.2%) and greater reductions in the number of cigarettes smoked (−9.5 ± 10.5 vs −5.6 ± 9.5; difference: −3.9; 95% CI: −6.5 to −1.4) at 52 weeks. Benefits were also observed among participants randomized to non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone. No differences in abstinence or reduction were found between nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to individual counseling alone, short-term use of standardized nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling is efficacious at increasing smoking abstinence at 52 weeks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 101833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of 12-Week e-Cigarette Use on Smoking Abstinence at 1 Year\",\"authors\":\"Kristian B. Filion PhD , Tetiana Zolotarova MD , Andréa Hébert-Losier MSc , Sarah B. Windle MPH , Pauline Reynier MSc , Todd Greenspoon MD , Tim Brandys MD , Tamàs Fülöp MD , Thang Nguyen MD , Stéphane Elkouri MD , Igor Wilderman MD , Olivier F. Bertrand MD , Joanna Alexis Bostwick MD , Yves Lacasse MD , Smita Pakhale MD , Mark J. Eisenberg MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The current evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We randomized 376 adults who smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day and were motivated to quit at 17 Canadian sites to 12 weeks of nicotine (15 mg/mL) e-cigarettes (n = 128), non-nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121). All groups received individual counseling. The primary endpoint was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks. The 52-week follow-up results are reported here.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants (mean age 52 ± 13 years; 47% female) smoked a mean of 21 ± 11 cigarettes/day at baseline. Compared to individual counseling alone, participants randomized to nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling had higher rates of point prevalence (23.6% vs 9.9%; difference: 13.7%; 95% CI: 4.6%-22.8%) and continuous abstinence (3.1% vs 0.0%; difference: 3.1%; 95% CI: 0.1%-6.2%) and greater reductions in the number of cigarettes smoked (−9.5 ± 10.5 vs −5.6 ± 9.5; difference: −3.9; 95% CI: −6.5 to −1.4) at 52 weeks. Benefits were also observed among participants randomized to non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone. No differences in abstinence or reduction were found between nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to individual counseling alone, short-term use of standardized nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling is efficacious at increasing smoking abstinence at 52 weeks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC advances\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25002522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25002522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前关于电子烟(电子烟)对戒烟的长期功效的证据尚不清楚。目的本研究的目的是评估尼古丁和非尼古丁电子烟对普通人群戒烟的有效性、安全性和耐受性。方法:我们在加拿大17个地点随机选取376名吸烟≥10支/天的成年人,让他们分别抽含尼古丁(15 mg/mL)的电子烟(n = 128)、不含尼古丁的电子烟(n = 127)或不抽电子烟(n = 121) 12周。所有小组都接受了个别辅导。主要终点是12周时的点流行戒断(7天回忆,使用过期一氧化碳进行生化验证)。52周随访结果见此。结果参与者平均年龄52±13岁;(47%女性)在基线时平均吸烟21±11支/天。与单独的个人咨询相比,随机选择尼古丁电子烟加咨询的参与者有更高的点患病率(23.6% vs 9.9%;区别:13.7%;95% CI: 4.6%-22.8%)和持续戒断(3.1% vs 0.0%;区别:3.1%;95% CI: 0.1%-6.2%)和吸烟数量的更大减少(- 9.5±10.5 vs - 5.6±9.5;区别:−3.9;95% CI:−6.5至−1.4)。在随机选择非尼古丁电子烟加咨询与单独咨询的参与者中也观察到益处。尼古丁电子烟和非尼古丁电子烟在戒烟或减少吸烟方面没有差异。结论短期使用标准尼古丁和非尼古丁电子烟加咨询与单独进行戒烟咨询相比,在52周时戒烟效果更好。
The Effect of 12-Week e-Cigarette Use on Smoking Abstinence at 1 Year
Background
The current evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation is unclear.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in the general population.
Methods
We randomized 376 adults who smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day and were motivated to quit at 17 Canadian sites to 12 weeks of nicotine (15 mg/mL) e-cigarettes (n = 128), non-nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121). All groups received individual counseling. The primary endpoint was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks. The 52-week follow-up results are reported here.
Results
Participants (mean age 52 ± 13 years; 47% female) smoked a mean of 21 ± 11 cigarettes/day at baseline. Compared to individual counseling alone, participants randomized to nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling had higher rates of point prevalence (23.6% vs 9.9%; difference: 13.7%; 95% CI: 4.6%-22.8%) and continuous abstinence (3.1% vs 0.0%; difference: 3.1%; 95% CI: 0.1%-6.2%) and greater reductions in the number of cigarettes smoked (−9.5 ± 10.5 vs −5.6 ± 9.5; difference: −3.9; 95% CI: −6.5 to −1.4) at 52 weeks. Benefits were also observed among participants randomized to non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone. No differences in abstinence or reduction were found between nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes.
Conclusions
Compared to individual counseling alone, short-term use of standardized nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling is efficacious at increasing smoking abstinence at 52 weeks.