设计体验式学习的教育策略:卡尔顿大学的ahp模糊逻辑案例研究

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Armin Mahmoodi , Mehdi Eshaghi , Jeremy Laliberte
{"title":"设计体验式学习的教育策略:卡尔顿大学的ahp模糊逻辑案例研究","authors":"Armin Mahmoodi ,&nbsp;Mehdi Eshaghi ,&nbsp;Jeremy Laliberte","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes a hybrid decision-making framework integrating SWOT analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Fuzzy Number Theory (FNT) to structure and evaluate stakeholder perspectives on experiential learning. Applied at Carleton University, the model prioritizes experiential learning strategies using over 300 structured questionnaire responses from students and faculty. To ensure theoretical alignment, the analysis is interpreted through Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory. Results show that students emphasize external partnerships, while faculty prioritize internal capacity building. The use of fuzzy logic addresses uncertainty and enables more balanced, stakeholder-informed planning. This study contributes to strategic educational planning by demonstrating how structured decision science methods can incorporate stakeholder preferences into actionable strategies. Future research may involve additional actors, such as employers, or extend the model to curriculum development and digital transformation in higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 3","pages":"Article 100576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing educational strategies for experiential learning: An AHP-fuzzy logic case study at carleton university\",\"authors\":\"Armin Mahmoodi ,&nbsp;Mehdi Eshaghi ,&nbsp;Jeremy Laliberte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study proposes a hybrid decision-making framework integrating SWOT analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Fuzzy Number Theory (FNT) to structure and evaluate stakeholder perspectives on experiential learning. Applied at Carleton University, the model prioritizes experiential learning strategies using over 300 structured questionnaire responses from students and faculty. To ensure theoretical alignment, the analysis is interpreted through Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory. Results show that students emphasize external partnerships, while faculty prioritize internal capacity building. The use of fuzzy logic addresses uncertainty and enables more balanced, stakeholder-informed planning. This study contributes to strategic educational planning by demonstrating how structured decision science methods can incorporate stakeholder preferences into actionable strategies. Future research may involve additional actors, such as employers, or extend the model to curriculum development and digital transformation in higher education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125001118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125001118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出一个整合SWOT分析、层次分析法(AHP)和模糊数论(FNT)的混合决策框架,以建构和评估利益相关者对体验学习的看法。该模型在卡尔顿大学(Carleton University)得到应用,利用300多份来自学生和教师的结构化问卷回答,优先考虑体验式学习策略。为了确保理论的一致性,分析通过科尔布的体验式学习理论来解释。结果表明,学生强调外部伙伴关系,而教师优先考虑内部能力建设。模糊逻辑的使用解决了不确定性,并实现了更平衡的、利益相关者知情的规划。本研究通过展示结构化决策科学方法如何将利益相关者偏好纳入可操作的战略,为战略教育规划做出了贡献。未来的研究可能会涉及其他参与者,如雇主,或将该模型扩展到高等教育的课程开发和数字化转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing educational strategies for experiential learning: An AHP-fuzzy logic case study at carleton university
This study proposes a hybrid decision-making framework integrating SWOT analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Fuzzy Number Theory (FNT) to structure and evaluate stakeholder perspectives on experiential learning. Applied at Carleton University, the model prioritizes experiential learning strategies using over 300 structured questionnaire responses from students and faculty. To ensure theoretical alignment, the analysis is interpreted through Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory. Results show that students emphasize external partnerships, while faculty prioritize internal capacity building. The use of fuzzy logic addresses uncertainty and enables more balanced, stakeholder-informed planning. This study contributes to strategic educational planning by demonstrating how structured decision science methods can incorporate stakeholder preferences into actionable strategies. Future research may involve additional actors, such as employers, or extend the model to curriculum development and digital transformation in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信