{"title":"农业相对回报对耕地撂荒的影响,就是无所得无所得","authors":"Linyi Zheng , Songqing Jin , Liufang Su","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cropland abandonment exerts far-reaching consequences for food security and sustainable agricultural development. However, while it is generally believed that low agricultural comparative return (ACR) is the main cause of cropland abandonment, the magnitude of such effects and their underlying mechanisms are not well understood. On the basis of constructing a mathematical model and analysis framework, we adopt a panel high-dimensional fixed-effects model to investigate the impact of ACR on cropland abandonment. Employing a large-scale farm-level panel data from Chinese Family Databases during 2015–2021, we find that ACR has a positive impact on the proportion of abandoned cropland area to total cropland area, with an average coefficient of 0.016. This effect is mainly achieved through reductions in long-term land investment, agricultural capital input, and agricultural labor input. Nevertheless, it is also moderated by the effects of rural factor markets and government agricultural subsidies. In particular, the agricultural machinery market, the land rental market and the level of agricultural subsidies can weaken ACR's negative impact on land use. Our findings also reveal that ACR is not harmful to households in northeastern and central China or major grain producing areas, while it harms others. Overall, this study provides a better understanding of the quantitative relationship between ACR and cropland abandonment in rural China, and valuable insights for other developing countries in formulating targeted measures to curb cropland abandonment in low ACR situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103759"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of nothing comes nothing: the impact of agricultural comparative return on cropland abandonment\",\"authors\":\"Linyi Zheng , Songqing Jin , Liufang Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cropland abandonment exerts far-reaching consequences for food security and sustainable agricultural development. However, while it is generally believed that low agricultural comparative return (ACR) is the main cause of cropland abandonment, the magnitude of such effects and their underlying mechanisms are not well understood. On the basis of constructing a mathematical model and analysis framework, we adopt a panel high-dimensional fixed-effects model to investigate the impact of ACR on cropland abandonment. Employing a large-scale farm-level panel data from Chinese Family Databases during 2015–2021, we find that ACR has a positive impact on the proportion of abandoned cropland area to total cropland area, with an average coefficient of 0.016. This effect is mainly achieved through reductions in long-term land investment, agricultural capital input, and agricultural labor input. Nevertheless, it is also moderated by the effects of rural factor markets and government agricultural subsidies. In particular, the agricultural machinery market, the land rental market and the level of agricultural subsidies can weaken ACR's negative impact on land use. Our findings also reveal that ACR is not harmful to households in northeastern and central China or major grain producing areas, while it harms others. Overall, this study provides a better understanding of the quantitative relationship between ACR and cropland abandonment in rural China, and valuable insights for other developing countries in formulating targeted measures to curb cropland abandonment in low ACR situations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Of nothing comes nothing: the impact of agricultural comparative return on cropland abandonment
Cropland abandonment exerts far-reaching consequences for food security and sustainable agricultural development. However, while it is generally believed that low agricultural comparative return (ACR) is the main cause of cropland abandonment, the magnitude of such effects and their underlying mechanisms are not well understood. On the basis of constructing a mathematical model and analysis framework, we adopt a panel high-dimensional fixed-effects model to investigate the impact of ACR on cropland abandonment. Employing a large-scale farm-level panel data from Chinese Family Databases during 2015–2021, we find that ACR has a positive impact on the proportion of abandoned cropland area to total cropland area, with an average coefficient of 0.016. This effect is mainly achieved through reductions in long-term land investment, agricultural capital input, and agricultural labor input. Nevertheless, it is also moderated by the effects of rural factor markets and government agricultural subsidies. In particular, the agricultural machinery market, the land rental market and the level of agricultural subsidies can weaken ACR's negative impact on land use. Our findings also reveal that ACR is not harmful to households in northeastern and central China or major grain producing areas, while it harms others. Overall, this study provides a better understanding of the quantitative relationship between ACR and cropland abandonment in rural China, and valuable insights for other developing countries in formulating targeted measures to curb cropland abandonment in low ACR situations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.