Inés Sánchez-Movellán, Toraya Fernández-Ruiz, Richard Dronskowski, Ángel Martín-Pendás, Pablo García-Fernández, Miguel Moreno and José Antonio Aramburu*,
{"title":"立方钙钛矿中的磁超交换和莫特绝缘体机制:从第一性原理到典型模型。","authors":"Inés Sánchez-Movellán, Toraya Fernández-Ruiz, Richard Dronskowski, Ángel Martín-Pendás, Pablo García-Fernández, Miguel Moreno and José Antonio Aramburu*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The ground state of many insulating, open-shell transition-metal perovskites with a 180° metal–ligand–metal bridge is antiferromagnetic (AFM), as predicted by Anderson’s superexchange interaction or Hubbard’s model. These well-established, standard models show how these systems are insulators due to the minimization of the interactions between electrons, at the cost of localizing the electrons on the metal ions. In this work, we carry out first-principles simulations on the cubic perovskites KNiF<sub>3</sub> and KVF<sub>3</sub>, analyzing electron densities, energies and bond indices. Although our calculations predict an antiferromagnetic ordering (AFM), in agreement with canonical superexchange models, we show through various indicators that the stabilization of this phase is not mainly associated with the antibonding magnetic orbitals but rather with bonding orbitals not included in the models. In particular, these traditional descriptions of superexchange do not adequately describe the ligand-to-metal electronic backdonation, which is an important element for stabilizing the insulating state of the two studied perovskite fluorides, albeit by diametrically different mechanisms: (1) reducing electron–electron repulsion in KNiF<sub>3</sub>, as proposed by Hubbard, whereas (2) enhancing electron–nuclear attraction in KVF<sub>3</sub>. Our findings highlight some of the limitations of these foundational models and offer a novel perspective on the understanding of magnetism.</p><p >The origin of the nonmagnetic (NM) metallic phase instability and the stabilization of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) versus the ferromagnetic (FM) phase have been studied by first-principles calculations on cubic perovskites KMF<sub>3</sub> (M = Ni, V) and compared to canonical superexchange models (Anderson’s, Hubbard’s). We observe changes in the electron density, accounting for the largest part of the energy stabilization, that cannot be described by minimal models that only consider the magnetic orbitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":40,"journal":{"name":"Inorganic Chemistry","volume":"64 26","pages":"13217–13223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01522","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic Superexchange and Mott Insulator Mechanisms in Cubic Perovskites: From First-Principles to Canonical Models\",\"authors\":\"Inés Sánchez-Movellán, Toraya Fernández-Ruiz, Richard Dronskowski, Ángel Martín-Pendás, Pablo García-Fernández, Miguel Moreno and José Antonio Aramburu*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The ground state of many insulating, open-shell transition-metal perovskites with a 180° metal–ligand–metal bridge is antiferromagnetic (AFM), as predicted by Anderson’s superexchange interaction or Hubbard’s model. These well-established, standard models show how these systems are insulators due to the minimization of the interactions between electrons, at the cost of localizing the electrons on the metal ions. In this work, we carry out first-principles simulations on the cubic perovskites KNiF<sub>3</sub> and KVF<sub>3</sub>, analyzing electron densities, energies and bond indices. Although our calculations predict an antiferromagnetic ordering (AFM), in agreement with canonical superexchange models, we show through various indicators that the stabilization of this phase is not mainly associated with the antibonding magnetic orbitals but rather with bonding orbitals not included in the models. In particular, these traditional descriptions of superexchange do not adequately describe the ligand-to-metal electronic backdonation, which is an important element for stabilizing the insulating state of the two studied perovskite fluorides, albeit by diametrically different mechanisms: (1) reducing electron–electron repulsion in KNiF<sub>3</sub>, as proposed by Hubbard, whereas (2) enhancing electron–nuclear attraction in KVF<sub>3</sub>. Our findings highlight some of the limitations of these foundational models and offer a novel perspective on the understanding of magnetism.</p><p >The origin of the nonmagnetic (NM) metallic phase instability and the stabilization of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) versus the ferromagnetic (FM) phase have been studied by first-principles calculations on cubic perovskites KMF<sub>3</sub> (M = Ni, V) and compared to canonical superexchange models (Anderson’s, Hubbard’s). We observe changes in the electron density, accounting for the largest part of the energy stabilization, that cannot be described by minimal models that only consider the magnetic orbitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inorganic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"64 26\",\"pages\":\"13217–13223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01522\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inorganic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01522\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Magnetic Superexchange and Mott Insulator Mechanisms in Cubic Perovskites: From First-Principles to Canonical Models
The ground state of many insulating, open-shell transition-metal perovskites with a 180° metal–ligand–metal bridge is antiferromagnetic (AFM), as predicted by Anderson’s superexchange interaction or Hubbard’s model. These well-established, standard models show how these systems are insulators due to the minimization of the interactions between electrons, at the cost of localizing the electrons on the metal ions. In this work, we carry out first-principles simulations on the cubic perovskites KNiF3 and KVF3, analyzing electron densities, energies and bond indices. Although our calculations predict an antiferromagnetic ordering (AFM), in agreement with canonical superexchange models, we show through various indicators that the stabilization of this phase is not mainly associated with the antibonding magnetic orbitals but rather with bonding orbitals not included in the models. In particular, these traditional descriptions of superexchange do not adequately describe the ligand-to-metal electronic backdonation, which is an important element for stabilizing the insulating state of the two studied perovskite fluorides, albeit by diametrically different mechanisms: (1) reducing electron–electron repulsion in KNiF3, as proposed by Hubbard, whereas (2) enhancing electron–nuclear attraction in KVF3. Our findings highlight some of the limitations of these foundational models and offer a novel perspective on the understanding of magnetism.
The origin of the nonmagnetic (NM) metallic phase instability and the stabilization of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) versus the ferromagnetic (FM) phase have been studied by first-principles calculations on cubic perovskites KMF3 (M = Ni, V) and compared to canonical superexchange models (Anderson’s, Hubbard’s). We observe changes in the electron density, accounting for the largest part of the energy stabilization, that cannot be described by minimal models that only consider the magnetic orbitals.
期刊介绍:
Inorganic Chemistry publishes fundamental studies in all phases of inorganic chemistry. Coverage includes experimental and theoretical reports on quantitative studies of structure and thermodynamics, kinetics, mechanisms of inorganic reactions, bioinorganic chemistry, and relevant aspects of organometallic chemistry, solid-state phenomena, and chemical bonding theory. Emphasis is placed on the synthesis, structure, thermodynamics, reactivity, spectroscopy, and bonding properties of significant new and known compounds.