信任,但要验证:监督潜在高风险生命科学研究的“公正文化”模式。

Ben C Snyder, Joshua M Wentzel, Gerald L Epstein, Robert P Kadlec, Gerald W Parker
{"title":"信任,但要验证:监督潜在高风险生命科学研究的“公正文化”模式。","authors":"Ben C Snyder, Joshua M Wentzel, Gerald L Epstein, Robert P Kadlec, Gerald W Parker","doi":"10.1089/apb.2024.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A \"just culture\" balances accountability for misconduct with transparency, collaboration, and proactive engagement to address the root causes of accidents and compliance issues. Fostering a just culture in the oversight of potentially high-risk life sciences research would allow the U.S. government to improve biosafety and biosecurity while promoting beneficial research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors explore four proposed elements of a just culture approach to oversight: (1) an enforcement continuum with options ranging from cooperative engagement to legal penalties, (2) non-punitive reporting of safety and security incidents, (3) technical assistance for researchers and institutions subject to oversight, and (4) outreach and two-way information sharing across the life sciences research enterprise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Promoting a just culture would support effective risk management by combining bottom-up scientific responsibility with top-down oversight and accountability. Implementing this approach will be challenging and require extensive stakeholder engagement, but adoption in the aviation industry shows it can succeed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520561,"journal":{"name":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","volume":"30 2","pages":"107-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust, but Verify: A \\\"Just Culture\\\" Model for Oversight of Potentially High-Risk Life Sciences Research.\",\"authors\":\"Ben C Snyder, Joshua M Wentzel, Gerald L Epstein, Robert P Kadlec, Gerald W Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apb.2024.0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A \\\"just culture\\\" balances accountability for misconduct with transparency, collaboration, and proactive engagement to address the root causes of accidents and compliance issues. Fostering a just culture in the oversight of potentially high-risk life sciences research would allow the U.S. government to improve biosafety and biosecurity while promoting beneficial research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors explore four proposed elements of a just culture approach to oversight: (1) an enforcement continuum with options ranging from cooperative engagement to legal penalties, (2) non-punitive reporting of safety and security incidents, (3) technical assistance for researchers and institutions subject to oversight, and (4) outreach and two-way information sharing across the life sciences research enterprise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Promoting a just culture would support effective risk management by combining bottom-up scientific responsibility with top-down oversight and accountability. Implementing this approach will be challenging and require extensive stakeholder engagement, but adoption in the aviation industry shows it can succeed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"107-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2024.0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2024.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:“公正文化”平衡了对不当行为的问责与透明度、协作和主动参与,以解决事故和合规问题的根本原因。在对潜在高风险的生命科学研究的监督中培养一种公正的文化,将使美国政府在促进有益研究的同时提高生物安全和生物安全。讨论:作者探讨了公正文化监督方法的四个建议要素:(1)从合作参与到法律处罚的执行连续性,(2)安全与安全事件的非惩罚性报告,(3)对受监督的研究人员和机构的技术援助,以及(4)整个生命科学研究企业的外展和双向信息共享。结论:通过将自下而上的科学责任与自上而下的监督和问责相结合,促进公正的文化将支持有效的风险管理。实施这种方法将具有挑战性,需要利益相关者的广泛参与,但航空业的采用表明它可以成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust, but Verify: A "Just Culture" Model for Oversight of Potentially High-Risk Life Sciences Research.

Introduction: A "just culture" balances accountability for misconduct with transparency, collaboration, and proactive engagement to address the root causes of accidents and compliance issues. Fostering a just culture in the oversight of potentially high-risk life sciences research would allow the U.S. government to improve biosafety and biosecurity while promoting beneficial research.

Discussion: The authors explore four proposed elements of a just culture approach to oversight: (1) an enforcement continuum with options ranging from cooperative engagement to legal penalties, (2) non-punitive reporting of safety and security incidents, (3) technical assistance for researchers and institutions subject to oversight, and (4) outreach and two-way information sharing across the life sciences research enterprise.

Conclusion: Promoting a just culture would support effective risk management by combining bottom-up scientific responsibility with top-down oversight and accountability. Implementing this approach will be challenging and require extensive stakeholder engagement, but adoption in the aviation industry shows it can succeed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信