Ninna L. Larsen, Anna S. Koefoed, Ulla Kampmann, Ravi Retnakaran, Per G. Ovesen, Jens Fuglsang
{"title":"双胎妊娠与单胎妊娠的妊娠期糖尿病:一项回顾性病例对照研究。","authors":"Ninna L. Larsen, Anna S. Koefoed, Ulla Kampmann, Ravi Retnakaran, Per G. Ovesen, Jens Fuglsang","doi":"10.1111/dme.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To compare markers of glycaemic regulation in twin and singleton pregnancies in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective case–control study was performed. 53 twin and 212 matched singleton pregnant women with gestational diabetes were included. Data were obtained from patient files. Twin and singleton pregnant women were compared regarding clinical characteristics and parameters related to glucose metabolism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to singleton pregnant women, twin pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM earlier in pregnancy (gestational age (GA) (weeks + days) 24 + 5 ± 5 + 2 vs. GA 27 + 2 ± 5 + 2; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The proportion of women treated with insulin was similar (24.1% vs. 24.5%, <i>p</i> = 1.0), but in twin pregnancies, insulin treatment was commenced earlier (GA 25 + 2 ± 4 + 6 vs. GA 30 + 1 ± 5 + 0; <i>p</i> = 0.003). At diagnosis, the HbA1c value was significantly lower in twin pregnant women (34 (5.3) ± 4.8 (2.6) vs. 35.9 (5.4) ± 5.4 (2.6), <i>p</i> = 0.03), but mean HbA1c values were similar in 2nd (33.9 (5.3) ± 4.6 (2.6) vs. 35.7 (5.4) ± 5.3 (2.6), <i>p</i> = 0.16) and 3rd trimester (35.1 (5.5) ± 4.2 (2.5) vs. 36.0 (5.4) ± 5.1 (2.6), <i>p</i> = 0.25).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We have characterized the effect of twin pregnancy on parameters of glucose metabolism and glycaemic control in GDM in one of the largest studies of twin pregnant women with GDM to date. We conclude that twin pregnant women may have the GDM diagnosis earlier, but diurnal insulin requirements and HbA1c levels are comparable with singleton pregnant women.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":"42 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.70095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies versus singleton pregnancies—A retrospective case–control study\",\"authors\":\"Ninna L. Larsen, Anna S. Koefoed, Ulla Kampmann, Ravi Retnakaran, Per G. Ovesen, Jens Fuglsang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare markers of glycaemic regulation in twin and singleton pregnancies in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective case–control study was performed. 53 twin and 212 matched singleton pregnant women with gestational diabetes were included. Data were obtained from patient files. Twin and singleton pregnant women were compared regarding clinical characteristics and parameters related to glucose metabolism.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared to singleton pregnant women, twin pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM earlier in pregnancy (gestational age (GA) (weeks + days) 24 + 5 ± 5 + 2 vs. GA 27 + 2 ± 5 + 2; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The proportion of women treated with insulin was similar (24.1% vs. 24.5%, <i>p</i> = 1.0), but in twin pregnancies, insulin treatment was commenced earlier (GA 25 + 2 ± 4 + 6 vs. GA 30 + 1 ± 5 + 0; <i>p</i> = 0.003). At diagnosis, the HbA1c value was significantly lower in twin pregnant women (34 (5.3) ± 4.8 (2.6) vs. 35.9 (5.4) ± 5.4 (2.6), <i>p</i> = 0.03), but mean HbA1c values were similar in 2nd (33.9 (5.3) ± 4.6 (2.6) vs. 35.7 (5.4) ± 5.3 (2.6), <i>p</i> = 0.16) and 3rd trimester (35.1 (5.5) ± 4.2 (2.5) vs. 36.0 (5.4) ± 5.1 (2.6), <i>p</i> = 0.25).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We have characterized the effect of twin pregnancy on parameters of glucose metabolism and glycaemic control in GDM in one of the largest studies of twin pregnant women with GDM to date. We conclude that twin pregnant women may have the GDM diagnosis earlier, but diurnal insulin requirements and HbA1c levels are comparable with singleton pregnant women.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"42 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.70095\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.70095\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)双胎妊娠和单胎妊娠的血糖调节指标。方法:采用回顾性病例对照研究。包括53名双胞胎和212名匹配的单胎妊娠糖尿病孕妇。数据来自患者档案。比较双胎和单胎孕妇的临床特征和糖代谢相关参数。结果:与单胎孕妇相比,双胎孕妇在妊娠早期被诊断为GDM(胎龄(GA)(周+天)24 + 5±5 + 2 vs. GA 27 + 2±5 + 2;p = 0.002)。接受胰岛素治疗的女性比例相似(24.1% vs. 24.5%, p = 1.0),但在双胎妊娠中,胰岛素治疗开始得更早(GA 25 + 2±4 + 6 vs. GA 30 + 1±5 + 0;p = 0.003)。诊断时,双胎妊娠的HbA1c值明显降低(34(5.3)±4.8 (2.6)vs 35.9(5.4)±5.4 (2.6),p = 0.03),但第二妊娠期的平均HbA1c值相似(33.9(5.3)±4.6 (2.6)vs 35.7(5.4)±5.3 (2.6),p = 0.16)和第三妊娠期(35.1(5.5)±4.2 (2.5)vs 36.0(5.4)±5.1 (2.6),p = 0.25)。结论:我们在迄今为止最大的一项针对双胞胎妊娠GDM患者的研究中描述了双胞胎妊娠对GDM患者糖代谢和血糖控制参数的影响。我们得出结论,双胎孕妇可能更早诊断出GDM,但每日胰岛素需求和HbA1c水平与单胎孕妇相当。
Gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies versus singleton pregnancies—A retrospective case–control study
Aims
To compare markers of glycaemic regulation in twin and singleton pregnancies in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods
A retrospective case–control study was performed. 53 twin and 212 matched singleton pregnant women with gestational diabetes were included. Data were obtained from patient files. Twin and singleton pregnant women were compared regarding clinical characteristics and parameters related to glucose metabolism.
Results
Compared to singleton pregnant women, twin pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM earlier in pregnancy (gestational age (GA) (weeks + days) 24 + 5 ± 5 + 2 vs. GA 27 + 2 ± 5 + 2; p = 0.002). The proportion of women treated with insulin was similar (24.1% vs. 24.5%, p = 1.0), but in twin pregnancies, insulin treatment was commenced earlier (GA 25 + 2 ± 4 + 6 vs. GA 30 + 1 ± 5 + 0; p = 0.003). At diagnosis, the HbA1c value was significantly lower in twin pregnant women (34 (5.3) ± 4.8 (2.6) vs. 35.9 (5.4) ± 5.4 (2.6), p = 0.03), but mean HbA1c values were similar in 2nd (33.9 (5.3) ± 4.6 (2.6) vs. 35.7 (5.4) ± 5.3 (2.6), p = 0.16) and 3rd trimester (35.1 (5.5) ± 4.2 (2.5) vs. 36.0 (5.4) ± 5.1 (2.6), p = 0.25).
Conclusions
We have characterized the effect of twin pregnancy on parameters of glucose metabolism and glycaemic control in GDM in one of the largest studies of twin pregnant women with GDM to date. We conclude that twin pregnant women may have the GDM diagnosis earlier, but diurnal insulin requirements and HbA1c levels are comparable with singleton pregnant women.
期刊介绍:
Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions.
The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed.
We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services.
Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”