新技术(Khalifah技术)与脊裂在窄脊即刻种植中的对照:一项随机临床试验。

IF 1.7
Mosaad Abdaljawwad Khalifah
{"title":"新技术(Khalifah技术)与脊裂在窄脊即刻种植中的对照:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Mosaad Abdaljawwad Khalifah","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Horizontal deficiency of the alveolar ridge complicates dental implant (DI) placement. Although ridge splitting technique (RST) is very successful, the associated marginal bone loss (MBL) is a critical drawback. The current study aimed to present and compare a novel technique, the double expansion technique (DET), with RST.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 40 patients (57 DI) with narrow ridges were randomly allocated to control group employing RST, and to study group employing DET. Secondary stability, marginal bone loss (MBL), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), and probing depth (PD) were assessed at baseline (time of definitive abutment and temporary crown placement) and then at 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain and number of analgesic tablets consumed were assessed daily during the first postoperative week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study group had lower pain levels during the first two postoperative days. Study group presented greater primary and secondary stability at baseline and at 3 months. Moreover, it had less MBL at all time points and more KMW at the sixth and twelfth months. Otherwise, both groups showed comparable results regarding PI, BI, and BD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study group had superior performance, which may be attributed to the lower degree of trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Technique (Khalifah's technique) Vs Ridge Splitting in Immediate Implant Placement in Narrow Ridges: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mosaad Abdaljawwad Khalifah\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Horizontal deficiency of the alveolar ridge complicates dental implant (DI) placement. Although ridge splitting technique (RST) is very successful, the associated marginal bone loss (MBL) is a critical drawback. The current study aimed to present and compare a novel technique, the double expansion technique (DET), with RST.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 40 patients (57 DI) with narrow ridges were randomly allocated to control group employing RST, and to study group employing DET. Secondary stability, marginal bone loss (MBL), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), and probing depth (PD) were assessed at baseline (time of definitive abutment and temporary crown placement) and then at 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain and number of analgesic tablets consumed were assessed daily during the first postoperative week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study group had lower pain levels during the first two postoperative days. Study group presented greater primary and secondary stability at baseline and at 3 months. Moreover, it had less MBL at all time points and more KMW at the sixth and twelfth months. Otherwise, both groups showed comparable results regarding PI, BI, and BD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study group had superior performance, which may be attributed to the lower degree of trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨牙槽嵴水平缺陷对种植体(DI)放置的影响。虽然脊裂技术(RST)是非常成功的,但伴随的边缘骨丢失(MBL)是一个严重的缺点。本研究旨在介绍和比较一种新的技术,即双扩张技术(DET)和RST。材料和方法:将40例(57例)狭窄牙槽嵴患者随机分为采用RST的对照组和采用DET的研究组。在基线(确定基牙和临时置放冠的时间)、3、6和12个月分别评估二次稳定性、边缘骨丢失(MBL)、角化粘膜宽度(KMW)、斑块指数(PI)、出血指数(BI)和探查深度(PD)。术后第一周每天评估疼痛和镇痛片的用量。结果:研究组术后2天疼痛程度较低。研究组在基线和3个月时表现出更高的主要和次要稳定性。所有时间点的MBL均较低,第6个月和第12个月的KMW较高。除此之外,两组在PI、BI和bd方面的结果相当。结论:研究组表现更佳,这可能归因于较低的创伤程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Technique (Khalifah's technique) Vs Ridge Splitting in Immediate Implant Placement in Narrow Ridges: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Purpose: Horizontal deficiency of the alveolar ridge complicates dental implant (DI) placement. Although ridge splitting technique (RST) is very successful, the associated marginal bone loss (MBL) is a critical drawback. The current study aimed to present and compare a novel technique, the double expansion technique (DET), with RST.

Materials and methods: A total of 40 patients (57 DI) with narrow ridges were randomly allocated to control group employing RST, and to study group employing DET. Secondary stability, marginal bone loss (MBL), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), and probing depth (PD) were assessed at baseline (time of definitive abutment and temporary crown placement) and then at 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain and number of analgesic tablets consumed were assessed daily during the first postoperative week.

Results: Study group had lower pain levels during the first two postoperative days. Study group presented greater primary and secondary stability at baseline and at 3 months. Moreover, it had less MBL at all time points and more KMW at the sixth and twelfth months. Otherwise, both groups showed comparable results regarding PI, BI, and BD.

Conclusions: Study group had superior performance, which may be attributed to the lower degree of trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信