不对称振荡钻孔对骨密度、产热和种植体稳定性的影响。

IF 1.7
Henrique Tadeu do Rego Ferreira, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva, Bruno Salles Sotto Maior, Plinio Mendes Senna
{"title":"不对称振荡钻孔对骨密度、产热和种植体稳定性的影响。","authors":"Henrique Tadeu do Rego Ferreira, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva, Bruno Salles Sotto Maior, Plinio Mendes Senna","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Achieving optimal implant site preparation is crucial for successful osseointegration, particularly in low-density bone. Excessive heat generation during drilling can compromise bone vitality, leading to impaired healing, delayed osseointegration or implant failure. This study evaluates the effects of an oscillatory drilling technique on bone densification, heat generation, and implant stability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An in vitro study was conducted using pig rib segments to simulate low-density bone. Drilling protocols were performed usin three techniques: clockwise cutting (CW), counterclockwise densifying (CC), and oscillatory movement (OM) at 60° clockwise/240° counterclockwise. Drilling was performed with automated handpiece handling under controlled conditions. Thermal changes were recorded using a laser thermometer and infrared imaging, and bone densification was assessed using micro-CT analysis. The final insertion torque (IT) was measured to determine the primary stability and removal torque was recorded to access the stability loss for each implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CC and OM groups demonstrated significantly higher bone volume, intersection surface, and reduced trabecular separation compared to the CW group (p < 0.05). Although the CC group exhibited the highest temperature increase, all final temperatures remained below the critical threshold of 47°C. Infrared imaging showed overall less heat retained within the body of the drill in CW group compared to CC and OM. OM drills exhibited lower heat generation than the CC group with temperature peak approximately 5 mm above the drill tip. The OM and CC groups showed significantly higher IT than the CW group (p < 0.05). Implant removal revealed a stability reduction of 27.8±10.2%, 24.8±13.6%, and 20.2±8.2% for CW, CC and OM groups, respectively (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oscillatory movement during implant site preparation enhanced bone densification, improved primary stability, and maintained safe thermal levels. These findings suggest that oscillatory movement could serve as a promising alternative to conventional drilling techniques, particularly in low-density bone. Further studies are needed to explore its clinical applicability and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Asymmetric Oscillatory Drilling on Bone Densification, Heat Generation, and Implant Stability.\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Tadeu do Rego Ferreira, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva, Bruno Salles Sotto Maior, Plinio Mendes Senna\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Achieving optimal implant site preparation is crucial for successful osseointegration, particularly in low-density bone. Excessive heat generation during drilling can compromise bone vitality, leading to impaired healing, delayed osseointegration or implant failure. This study evaluates the effects of an oscillatory drilling technique on bone densification, heat generation, and implant stability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An in vitro study was conducted using pig rib segments to simulate low-density bone. Drilling protocols were performed usin three techniques: clockwise cutting (CW), counterclockwise densifying (CC), and oscillatory movement (OM) at 60° clockwise/240° counterclockwise. Drilling was performed with automated handpiece handling under controlled conditions. Thermal changes were recorded using a laser thermometer and infrared imaging, and bone densification was assessed using micro-CT analysis. The final insertion torque (IT) was measured to determine the primary stability and removal torque was recorded to access the stability loss for each implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CC and OM groups demonstrated significantly higher bone volume, intersection surface, and reduced trabecular separation compared to the CW group (p < 0.05). Although the CC group exhibited the highest temperature increase, all final temperatures remained below the critical threshold of 47°C. Infrared imaging showed overall less heat retained within the body of the drill in CW group compared to CC and OM. OM drills exhibited lower heat generation than the CC group with temperature peak approximately 5 mm above the drill tip. The OM and CC groups showed significantly higher IT than the CW group (p < 0.05). Implant removal revealed a stability reduction of 27.8±10.2%, 24.8±13.6%, and 20.2±8.2% for CW, CC and OM groups, respectively (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oscillatory movement during implant site preparation enhanced bone densification, improved primary stability, and maintained safe thermal levels. These findings suggest that oscillatory movement could serve as a promising alternative to conventional drilling techniques, particularly in low-density bone. Further studies are needed to explore its clinical applicability and long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:获得最佳种植体位置准备是骨整合成功的关键,特别是在低密度骨。钻孔过程中产生的过多热量会损害骨骼活力,导致愈合受损,骨整合延迟或种植体失败。本研究评估振荡钻孔技术对骨密度、产热和种植体稳定性的影响。材料与方法:采用猪肋段模拟低密度骨进行体外实验。钻井方案采用三种技术:顺时针切削(CW)、逆时针致密化(CC)和顺时针60°/逆时针240°的振荡运动(OM)。在受控条件下,通过自动机头处理进行钻孔。使用激光体温计和红外成像记录热变化,并使用显微ct分析评估骨密度。测量最终插入扭矩(IT)以确定初始稳定性,记录移除扭矩以获取每个植入物的稳定性损失。结果:与CW组相比,CC组和OM组骨体积、骨交点面积显著增加,骨小梁分离明显减少(p < 0.05)。虽然CC组表现出最高的温度升高,但所有最终温度都低于47°C的临界阈值。红外成像显示,与CC组和OM组相比,CW组钻体内保留的热量总体较少。与CC组相比,OM组的产热较低,温度峰值在钻头尖端上方约5 mm处。OM组和CC组的IT显著高于CW组(p < 0.05)。CW组、CC组和OM组的稳定性下降分别为27.8±10.2%、24.8±13.6%和20.2±8.2% (p < 0.05)。结论:种植体准备过程中的振荡运动增强了骨密度,改善了初始稳定性,并维持了安全的热水平。这些发现表明,振荡运动可以作为传统钻孔技术的一种有希望的替代方法,特别是在低密度骨中。其临床适用性和远期疗效有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Asymmetric Oscillatory Drilling on Bone Densification, Heat Generation, and Implant Stability.

Purpose: Achieving optimal implant site preparation is crucial for successful osseointegration, particularly in low-density bone. Excessive heat generation during drilling can compromise bone vitality, leading to impaired healing, delayed osseointegration or implant failure. This study evaluates the effects of an oscillatory drilling technique on bone densification, heat generation, and implant stability.

Materials and methods: An in vitro study was conducted using pig rib segments to simulate low-density bone. Drilling protocols were performed usin three techniques: clockwise cutting (CW), counterclockwise densifying (CC), and oscillatory movement (OM) at 60° clockwise/240° counterclockwise. Drilling was performed with automated handpiece handling under controlled conditions. Thermal changes were recorded using a laser thermometer and infrared imaging, and bone densification was assessed using micro-CT analysis. The final insertion torque (IT) was measured to determine the primary stability and removal torque was recorded to access the stability loss for each implant.

Results: The CC and OM groups demonstrated significantly higher bone volume, intersection surface, and reduced trabecular separation compared to the CW group (p < 0.05). Although the CC group exhibited the highest temperature increase, all final temperatures remained below the critical threshold of 47°C. Infrared imaging showed overall less heat retained within the body of the drill in CW group compared to CC and OM. OM drills exhibited lower heat generation than the CC group with temperature peak approximately 5 mm above the drill tip. The OM and CC groups showed significantly higher IT than the CW group (p < 0.05). Implant removal revealed a stability reduction of 27.8±10.2%, 24.8±13.6%, and 20.2±8.2% for CW, CC and OM groups, respectively (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Oscillatory movement during implant site preparation enhanced bone densification, improved primary stability, and maintained safe thermal levels. These findings suggest that oscillatory movement could serve as a promising alternative to conventional drilling techniques, particularly in low-density bone. Further studies are needed to explore its clinical applicability and long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信