微型种植体数量对微型种植体覆盖义齿修复下颌骨骨高水平的影响:一项队列临床研究。

Heba Elbelacy, Mona Samir Gaber, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Mohamed Rahhal
{"title":"微型种植体数量对微型种植体覆盖义齿修复下颌骨骨高水平的影响:一项队列临床研究。","authors":"Heba Elbelacy, Mona Samir Gaber, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Mohamed Rahhal","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implant-supported overdentures have shown promise in improving stability and function. The present study aimed to evaluate the bone level around implant-retained overdentures (IODs), comparing rehabilitations with 3 or 4 implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four edentulous participants were selected for this study; they were aged 60-70, with adequate rounded ridge, height, and width bone level. The participants were divided into two groups: Group 1, four mini-implants installed in the interforaminal area retaining mandibular overdentures; Group 2, three mini-implants placed in the interforaminal area. Patients underwent surgical procedures, postoperative care, and follow-up evaluations over one year to assess implant stability and bone level changes. Patients were recalled for re-evaluation and adjustments (6, 9, and 12 months) for clinical assessment and analysis of the marginal bone height changes around the implants. The statistical analysis for the comparison used an independent t-test, and between central and peripheral implants, a paired t-test; significance level if p ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the results between central and peripheral implants revealed a non-significant difference in Group 1; therefore, in Group 2, there was only a significant difference after 12 months, in which the peripheral implant bone level was significantly higher than the central implant (p = 0.03). The intergroup evaluation revealed that Group 2 demonstrated significantly higher bone height levels than Group 1 (p = 0.0001). The bone level between central and peripheral implants decreased significantly in every successive interval of all implants except the central implant of Group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest distinct differences in bone-level changes between central and peripheral implants and between the two different groups of implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the Number of Mini-Dental Implants on the Bone Height Level in Mandibles Rehabilitated with Mini-Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Cohort Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Heba Elbelacy, Mona Samir Gaber, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Mohamed Rahhal\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implant-supported overdentures have shown promise in improving stability and function. The present study aimed to evaluate the bone level around implant-retained overdentures (IODs), comparing rehabilitations with 3 or 4 implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four edentulous participants were selected for this study; they were aged 60-70, with adequate rounded ridge, height, and width bone level. The participants were divided into two groups: Group 1, four mini-implants installed in the interforaminal area retaining mandibular overdentures; Group 2, three mini-implants placed in the interforaminal area. Patients underwent surgical procedures, postoperative care, and follow-up evaluations over one year to assess implant stability and bone level changes. Patients were recalled for re-evaluation and adjustments (6, 9, and 12 months) for clinical assessment and analysis of the marginal bone height changes around the implants. The statistical analysis for the comparison used an independent t-test, and between central and peripheral implants, a paired t-test; significance level if p ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the results between central and peripheral implants revealed a non-significant difference in Group 1; therefore, in Group 2, there was only a significant difference after 12 months, in which the peripheral implant bone level was significantly higher than the central implant (p = 0.03). The intergroup evaluation revealed that Group 2 demonstrated significantly higher bone height levels than Group 1 (p = 0.0001). The bone level between central and peripheral implants decreased significantly in every successive interval of all implants except the central implant of Group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest distinct differences in bone-level changes between central and peripheral implants and between the two different groups of implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:种植覆盖义齿在提高稳定性和功能方面表现出良好的前景。本研究旨在评估种植体保留覆盖义齿(IODs)周围的骨水平,并比较3个或4个种植体的修复效果。材料与方法:本研究选择24例无牙者;患者年龄60-70岁,脊圆、骨高、骨宽水平。参与者分为两组:第一组,在椎间区固定下颌覆盖义齿,安装4个微型种植体;第二组,在椎间间区放置三个微型植入物。患者接受外科手术,术后护理和随访评估超过一年,以评估种植体稳定性和骨水平变化。患者被召回进行重新评估和调整(6,9和12个月),以临床评估和分析种植体周围边缘骨高度的变化。比较的统计分析采用独立t检验,中心植入物和外周植入物之间采用配对t检验;p≤0.05为显著性水平。结果:第一组中央种植体与外周种植体结果比较,差异无统计学意义;因此,第2组在12个月后仅差异有统计学意义,其中外周种植体骨水平显著高于中央种植体(p = 0.03)。组间评价显示,2组骨高水平显著高于1组(p = 0.0001)。除1组中央种植体外,其余种植体的骨水平在各连续时间间隔内均显著下降。结论:中央种植体和外周种植体以及两组种植体的骨水平变化有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of the Number of Mini-Dental Implants on the Bone Height Level in Mandibles Rehabilitated with Mini-Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Cohort Clinical Study.

Purpose: Implant-supported overdentures have shown promise in improving stability and function. The present study aimed to evaluate the bone level around implant-retained overdentures (IODs), comparing rehabilitations with 3 or 4 implants.

Materials and methods: Twenty-four edentulous participants were selected for this study; they were aged 60-70, with adequate rounded ridge, height, and width bone level. The participants were divided into two groups: Group 1, four mini-implants installed in the interforaminal area retaining mandibular overdentures; Group 2, three mini-implants placed in the interforaminal area. Patients underwent surgical procedures, postoperative care, and follow-up evaluations over one year to assess implant stability and bone level changes. Patients were recalled for re-evaluation and adjustments (6, 9, and 12 months) for clinical assessment and analysis of the marginal bone height changes around the implants. The statistical analysis for the comparison used an independent t-test, and between central and peripheral implants, a paired t-test; significance level if p ≤ 0.05.

Results: Comparing the results between central and peripheral implants revealed a non-significant difference in Group 1; therefore, in Group 2, there was only a significant difference after 12 months, in which the peripheral implant bone level was significantly higher than the central implant (p = 0.03). The intergroup evaluation revealed that Group 2 demonstrated significantly higher bone height levels than Group 1 (p = 0.0001). The bone level between central and peripheral implants decreased significantly in every successive interval of all implants except the central implant of Group 1.

Conclusion: The findings suggest distinct differences in bone-level changes between central and peripheral implants and between the two different groups of implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信