使用两种不同的根管封闭剂治疗根尖牙周炎患者后血清生物标志物水平的变化:一项随机对照试验

Jyoti Sharma, Pravin Kumar, Shailja Sharma, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Sharmila Shanmugam, Arun Kumar Patnana
{"title":"使用两种不同的根管封闭剂治疗根尖牙周炎患者后血清生物标志物水平的变化:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Jyoti Sharma, Pravin Kumar, Shailja Sharma, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Sharmila Shanmugam, Arun Kumar Patnana","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_213_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to comparatively evaluate the difference in serum pro-inflammatory (soluble cluster of differentiation-14 [sCD14]) and anti-inflammatory (interleukin-10 [IL-10]) biomarkers levels when 2 different root canal sealers are used during root canal treatment (RCT) in systemically healthy patients with apical periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial; 54 carious mature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis were randomized using a block randomization technique to either Group 1 (Tubli-seal) (<i>n</i> = 27) or Group 2 (BioRoot RCS) (<i>n</i> = 27). Participants received root canal treatment (RCT) and were followed up at 15 days and 2 months. Venous blood samples were obtained, and serum pro-inflammatory, sCD14, and anti-inflammatory, IL-10 biomarkers were assessed by ELISA, and Periapical healing was evaluated by periapical index (PAI). Intragroup and intergroup analysis was done using the Friedman and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, pro-inflammatory biomarker (sCD-14) demonstrated statistically significant results (<i>P</i> = 0.008). Regarding anti-inflammatory biomarker (IL-10), neither of the groups displayed statistically significant changes (<i>P</i> > 0.05). An analysis of the PAI scores revealed statistically significant improvements from preoperative to postoperative levels for both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RCT reduces serum pro-inflammatory biomarker levels and no significant changes in levels of anti-inflammatory biomarkers in patients of apical periodontitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 6","pages":"543-548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in serum biomarker levels in patients of apical periodontitis after root canal treatment using two different root canal sealers: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jyoti Sharma, Pravin Kumar, Shailja Sharma, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Sharmila Shanmugam, Arun Kumar Patnana\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_213_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to comparatively evaluate the difference in serum pro-inflammatory (soluble cluster of differentiation-14 [sCD14]) and anti-inflammatory (interleukin-10 [IL-10]) biomarkers levels when 2 different root canal sealers are used during root canal treatment (RCT) in systemically healthy patients with apical periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial; 54 carious mature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis were randomized using a block randomization technique to either Group 1 (Tubli-seal) (<i>n</i> = 27) or Group 2 (BioRoot RCS) (<i>n</i> = 27). Participants received root canal treatment (RCT) and were followed up at 15 days and 2 months. Venous blood samples were obtained, and serum pro-inflammatory, sCD14, and anti-inflammatory, IL-10 biomarkers were assessed by ELISA, and Periapical healing was evaluated by periapical index (PAI). Intragroup and intergroup analysis was done using the Friedman and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, pro-inflammatory biomarker (sCD-14) demonstrated statistically significant results (<i>P</i> = 0.008). Regarding anti-inflammatory biomarker (IL-10), neither of the groups displayed statistically significant changes (<i>P</i> > 0.05). An analysis of the PAI scores revealed statistically significant improvements from preoperative to postoperative levels for both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RCT reduces serum pro-inflammatory biomarker levels and no significant changes in levels of anti-inflammatory biomarkers in patients of apical periodontitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"543-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_213_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_213_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较评价两种不同根管封闭剂对全身健康的根尖牙炎患者在根管治疗(RCT)过程中血清促炎(可溶性分化簇-14 [sCD14])和抗炎(白细胞介素-10 [IL-10])生物标志物水平的影响。方法:采用平行双盲随机临床试验;采用分组随机法将54颗患有根尖牙周炎的龋齿成熟恒牙随机分为第1组(Tubli-seal)(27例)和第2组(BioRoot RCS)(27例)。参与者接受根管治疗(RCT),随访15天和2个月。采集静脉血样本,ELISA检测血清促炎、sCD14、抗炎、IL-10生物标志物,PAI检测根尖周愈合情况。组内分析和组间分析分别采用Friedman和Mann-Whitney u检验。结果:1组促炎生物标志物(sCD-14)差异有统计学意义(P = 0.008)。抗炎生物标志物IL-10,两组差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。PAI评分分析显示,两组患者术前至术后水平均有统计学显著改善(P = 0.00)。结论:RCT降低了根尖牙周炎患者血清促炎生物标志物水平,而抗炎生物标志物水平无显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change in serum biomarker levels in patients of apical periodontitis after root canal treatment using two different root canal sealers: A randomized controlled trial.

Aim: The aim of the study was to comparatively evaluate the difference in serum pro-inflammatory (soluble cluster of differentiation-14 [sCD14]) and anti-inflammatory (interleukin-10 [IL-10]) biomarkers levels when 2 different root canal sealers are used during root canal treatment (RCT) in systemically healthy patients with apical periodontitis.

Methods: The study was a parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial; 54 carious mature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis were randomized using a block randomization technique to either Group 1 (Tubli-seal) (n = 27) or Group 2 (BioRoot RCS) (n = 27). Participants received root canal treatment (RCT) and were followed up at 15 days and 2 months. Venous blood samples were obtained, and serum pro-inflammatory, sCD14, and anti-inflammatory, IL-10 biomarkers were assessed by ELISA, and Periapical healing was evaluated by periapical index (PAI). Intragroup and intergroup analysis was done using the Friedman and Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively.

Results: In Group 1, pro-inflammatory biomarker (sCD-14) demonstrated statistically significant results (P = 0.008). Regarding anti-inflammatory biomarker (IL-10), neither of the groups displayed statistically significant changes (P > 0.05). An analysis of the PAI scores revealed statistically significant improvements from preoperative to postoperative levels for both groups (P = 0.00).

Conclusion: RCT reduces serum pro-inflammatory biomarker levels and no significant changes in levels of anti-inflammatory biomarkers in patients of apical periodontitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信