Navin M Kariyawasam, Tehmina Ahmad, Shohinee Sarma, Raymond Fung
{"title":"不同途径雌二醇的跨女性个体雌酮/雌二醇比值及水平比较。","authors":"Navin M Kariyawasam, Tehmina Ahmad, Shohinee Sarma, Raymond Fung","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2023.0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Estradiol for gender-affirming hormone therapy can be taken in different routes: oral, sublingual, transdermal patch or gel, and injectable estradiol. We aimed at comparing the estrone and estradiol ratios and levels achieved in each of these different routes of estradiol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of transfeminine individuals attending an endocrinology clinic in Toronto, Canada. Study participants were grouped according to the route of estradiol administration: oral, injectable, transdermal, and sublingual. Our primary outcome was the estrone/estradiol ratio (E1/E2). Our secondary outcomes were the estradiol and estrone levels in each of these four groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 286 patients. The oral estradiol group had the highest E1/E2 ratio (9.28), followed by the sublingual group (6.88). Both the transdermal and injectable groups had substantially lower E1/E2 ratios (2.22 and 0.84, respectively). We observed a large variability of the E1/E2 ratio in the oral and sublingual groups, whereas the transdermal and the injectable groups' ratios had much smaller standard deviation. The mean estradiol in the injectable group (1557 pmol/L, 424.1 pg/mL) was markedly higher than the estradiol levels observed in all other routes of estradiol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data demonstrate significantly different E1/E2 ratios in the four different routes of estradiol administration, with oral and sublingual routes having the highest E1/E2 ratios followed by transdermal and injectable routes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94256,"journal":{"name":"Transgender health","volume":"10 3","pages":"261-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Estrone/Estradiol Ratio and Levels in Transfeminine Individuals on Different Routes of Estradiol.\",\"authors\":\"Navin M Kariyawasam, Tehmina Ahmad, Shohinee Sarma, Raymond Fung\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/trgh.2023.0138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Estradiol for gender-affirming hormone therapy can be taken in different routes: oral, sublingual, transdermal patch or gel, and injectable estradiol. We aimed at comparing the estrone and estradiol ratios and levels achieved in each of these different routes of estradiol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of transfeminine individuals attending an endocrinology clinic in Toronto, Canada. Study participants were grouped according to the route of estradiol administration: oral, injectable, transdermal, and sublingual. Our primary outcome was the estrone/estradiol ratio (E1/E2). Our secondary outcomes were the estradiol and estrone levels in each of these four groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 286 patients. The oral estradiol group had the highest E1/E2 ratio (9.28), followed by the sublingual group (6.88). Both the transdermal and injectable groups had substantially lower E1/E2 ratios (2.22 and 0.84, respectively). We observed a large variability of the E1/E2 ratio in the oral and sublingual groups, whereas the transdermal and the injectable groups' ratios had much smaller standard deviation. The mean estradiol in the injectable group (1557 pmol/L, 424.1 pg/mL) was markedly higher than the estradiol levels observed in all other routes of estradiol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data demonstrate significantly different E1/E2 ratios in the four different routes of estradiol administration, with oral and sublingual routes having the highest E1/E2 ratios followed by transdermal and injectable routes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transgender health\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"261-268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transgender health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2023.0138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2023.0138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Estrone/Estradiol Ratio and Levels in Transfeminine Individuals on Different Routes of Estradiol.
Purpose: Estradiol for gender-affirming hormone therapy can be taken in different routes: oral, sublingual, transdermal patch or gel, and injectable estradiol. We aimed at comparing the estrone and estradiol ratios and levels achieved in each of these different routes of estradiol.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of transfeminine individuals attending an endocrinology clinic in Toronto, Canada. Study participants were grouped according to the route of estradiol administration: oral, injectable, transdermal, and sublingual. Our primary outcome was the estrone/estradiol ratio (E1/E2). Our secondary outcomes were the estradiol and estrone levels in each of these four groups.
Results: We included 286 patients. The oral estradiol group had the highest E1/E2 ratio (9.28), followed by the sublingual group (6.88). Both the transdermal and injectable groups had substantially lower E1/E2 ratios (2.22 and 0.84, respectively). We observed a large variability of the E1/E2 ratio in the oral and sublingual groups, whereas the transdermal and the injectable groups' ratios had much smaller standard deviation. The mean estradiol in the injectable group (1557 pmol/L, 424.1 pg/mL) was markedly higher than the estradiol levels observed in all other routes of estradiol.
Conclusion: Our data demonstrate significantly different E1/E2 ratios in the four different routes of estradiol administration, with oral and sublingual routes having the highest E1/E2 ratios followed by transdermal and injectable routes.