[食物频次问卷与24小时膳食回忆或称重法评价孕妇膳食营养素摄入量的比较]。

Jing Zhang, Jiangfan Yu, Yifan Duan, Zhenyu Yang, Ye Bi, Yuwen Zhang, Changqing Liu, Yongli Zhao, Xuyang Gu, Jianghua Gao, Jingtao Duan, Jianqiang Lai, Haoyan Guo
{"title":"[食物频次问卷与24小时膳食回忆或称重法评价孕妇膳食营养素摄入量的比较]。","authors":"Jing Zhang, Jiangfan Yu, Yifan Duan, Zhenyu Yang, Ye Bi, Yuwen Zhang, Changqing Liu, Yongli Zhao, Xuyang Gu, Jianghua Gao, Jingtao Duan, Jianqiang Lai, Haoyan Guo","doi":"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences among Food Frequency Questionnaire(FFQ), 24-hour dietary recall method, and weighing method in assessing the intakes of foods, energy, and nutrients in pregnant women, and to evaluate the validity of the FFQ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June to September in 2017, a total of 82 pregnant women were recruited across the entire Wuqiang County in Hebei Province. The subjects were surveyed using the FFQ for the most recent week, 24-hour dietary recall for 3 consecutive days, and in-home weighing for 3 consecutive days. The differences in the average daily intakes of food, energy, and nutrients obtained by the FFQ and the other two method were calculated and compared. The correlation and consistency between the FFQ and the other two method were evaluated through the Spearman correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in assessing the average daily intakes of soybeans and their products, fruits, dairy products and nuts. The intakes of fruits and dairy products evaluated by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.34-0.56, P&lt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and the weighing method in assessing the average daily intakes of cereals, soybeans and their products, vegetables, fruits, aquatic products, eggs, dairy products and nuts. Among them, the intakes obtained by the two method for cereals, vegetables and nuts were all positively correlated(r=0.53-0.58, P&lt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in evaluating average daily intakes of energy, protein, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, dietary fiber, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron and zinc. Among them, intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were all positively correlated(r=0.41-0.58, P&lt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between FFQ and weighing method in evaluating the average daily intakes of energy, fat, the ratio of fat to energy supply, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, potassium, sodium and magnesium. Among them, the intakes of energy, protein and carbohydrates obtained by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.49-0.52, P&lt;0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that for most subjects, the intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were within the 95% consistency limits between FFQ and 24-hour recall method(91.1%-94.9%)or weighing method(92.9%-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FFQ can relatively accurately evaluate the intakes of food and nutrients among pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":57744,"journal":{"name":"卫生研究","volume":"54 3","pages":"455-464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison between food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour dietary recall or weighing methods in evaluating dietary nutrient intakes of pregnant women].\",\"authors\":\"Jing Zhang, Jiangfan Yu, Yifan Duan, Zhenyu Yang, Ye Bi, Yuwen Zhang, Changqing Liu, Yongli Zhao, Xuyang Gu, Jianghua Gao, Jingtao Duan, Jianqiang Lai, Haoyan Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.03.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences among Food Frequency Questionnaire(FFQ), 24-hour dietary recall method, and weighing method in assessing the intakes of foods, energy, and nutrients in pregnant women, and to evaluate the validity of the FFQ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June to September in 2017, a total of 82 pregnant women were recruited across the entire Wuqiang County in Hebei Province. The subjects were surveyed using the FFQ for the most recent week, 24-hour dietary recall for 3 consecutive days, and in-home weighing for 3 consecutive days. The differences in the average daily intakes of food, energy, and nutrients obtained by the FFQ and the other two method were calculated and compared. The correlation and consistency between the FFQ and the other two method were evaluated through the Spearman correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in assessing the average daily intakes of soybeans and their products, fruits, dairy products and nuts. The intakes of fruits and dairy products evaluated by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.34-0.56, P&lt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and the weighing method in assessing the average daily intakes of cereals, soybeans and their products, vegetables, fruits, aquatic products, eggs, dairy products and nuts. Among them, the intakes obtained by the two method for cereals, vegetables and nuts were all positively correlated(r=0.53-0.58, P&lt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in evaluating average daily intakes of energy, protein, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, dietary fiber, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron and zinc. Among them, intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were all positively correlated(r=0.41-0.58, P&lt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between FFQ and weighing method in evaluating the average daily intakes of energy, fat, the ratio of fat to energy supply, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, potassium, sodium and magnesium. Among them, the intakes of energy, protein and carbohydrates obtained by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.49-0.52, P&lt;0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that for most subjects, the intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were within the 95% consistency limits between FFQ and 24-hour recall method(91.1%-94.9%)or weighing method(92.9%-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FFQ can relatively accurately evaluate the intakes of food and nutrients among pregnant women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":57744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"卫生研究\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"455-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"卫生研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.03.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"卫生研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.03.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较食物频率问卷法(Food Frequency Questionnaire, FFQ)、24小时膳食回忆法和称重法在评估孕妇食物、能量和营养素摄入量方面的异同,评价FFQ的效度。方法:2017年6 - 9月,在河北省武强县招募孕妇82例。采用FFQ法对受试者进行最近一周的调查,连续3天进行24小时饮食回忆,连续3天进行家中称重。计算和比较FFQ法和其他两种方法获得的平均每日食物、能量和营养素摄入量的差异。通过Spearman相关系数和Bland-Altman图分别评价FFQ与其他两种方法的相关性和一致性。结果:FFQ法与24小时膳食回忆法在评估大豆及其制品、水果、乳制品和坚果的平均日摄入量方面差异无统计学意义。两种方法评价的水果和乳制品摄入量均呈正相关(r=0.34 ~ 0.56, P<0.05)。在评估谷物、大豆及其制品、蔬菜、水果、水产品、鸡蛋、乳制品和坚果的平均日摄入量方面,FFQ法与称重法的差异无统计学意义。其中,两种方法对谷类、蔬菜和坚果的摄食量均呈正相关(r=0.53-0.58, P<0.05)。FFQ法与24小时膳食回忆法在评价能量、蛋白质、碳水化合物、碳水化合物与能量供应比、膳食纤维、总维生素A、硫胺素、核黄素、维生素C、钙、磷、钾、镁、铁、锌的平均日摄入量方面差异无统计学意义。其中,能量、蛋白质、脂肪和碳水化合物摄入量均呈正相关(r=0.41-0.58, P<0.05)。在能量、脂肪、脂肪供能比、碳水化合物、碳水化合物供能比、总维生素A、硫胺素、核黄素、维生素C、钙、钾、钠、镁等指标的评价上,FFQ法与称重法差异无统计学意义。其中,两种方法获得的能量、蛋白质和碳水化合物摄入量均呈正相关(r=0.49-0.52, P<0.05)。Bland-Altman分析显示,大多数被试的能量、蛋白质、脂肪和碳水化合物摄入量与24小时回忆法(91.1% ~ 94.9%)或称重法(92.9% ~ 100%)的一致性限在95%以内。结论:FFQ能较准确地评价孕妇的食物和营养素摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparison between food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour dietary recall or weighing methods in evaluating dietary nutrient intakes of pregnant women].

Objective: This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences among Food Frequency Questionnaire(FFQ), 24-hour dietary recall method, and weighing method in assessing the intakes of foods, energy, and nutrients in pregnant women, and to evaluate the validity of the FFQ.

Methods: From June to September in 2017, a total of 82 pregnant women were recruited across the entire Wuqiang County in Hebei Province. The subjects were surveyed using the FFQ for the most recent week, 24-hour dietary recall for 3 consecutive days, and in-home weighing for 3 consecutive days. The differences in the average daily intakes of food, energy, and nutrients obtained by the FFQ and the other two method were calculated and compared. The correlation and consistency between the FFQ and the other two method were evaluated through the Spearman correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot, respectively.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in assessing the average daily intakes of soybeans and their products, fruits, dairy products and nuts. The intakes of fruits and dairy products evaluated by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.34-0.56, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and the weighing method in assessing the average daily intakes of cereals, soybeans and their products, vegetables, fruits, aquatic products, eggs, dairy products and nuts. Among them, the intakes obtained by the two method for cereals, vegetables and nuts were all positively correlated(r=0.53-0.58, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in evaluating average daily intakes of energy, protein, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, dietary fiber, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron and zinc. Among them, intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were all positively correlated(r=0.41-0.58, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between FFQ and weighing method in evaluating the average daily intakes of energy, fat, the ratio of fat to energy supply, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, potassium, sodium and magnesium. Among them, the intakes of energy, protein and carbohydrates obtained by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.49-0.52, P<0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that for most subjects, the intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were within the 95% consistency limits between FFQ and 24-hour recall method(91.1%-94.9%)or weighing method(92.9%-100%).

Conclusion: FFQ can relatively accurately evaluate the intakes of food and nutrients among pregnant women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8734
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信