立法限制获得电痉挛疗法正在增加-呼吁合理和基于证据的立法。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Emily M Beydler, Lauren M Katzell, Joseph Dragonetti, Nicholas Ortiz
{"title":"立法限制获得电痉挛疗法正在增加-呼吁合理和基于证据的立法。","authors":"Emily M Beydler, Lauren M Katzell, Joseph Dragonetti, Nicholas Ortiz","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an increasing body of legislation that limits access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with a relative lack of directives and recommendations from psychiatrists regarding these laws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors utilized LexisNexis to examine newer legislation related to various aspects of ECT and the implications of these laws in ECT treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These laws include regulations regarding informed consent, age restrictions, and approved practitioners. All but one of these enacted laws are restrictive.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Such laws reduce the availability of this life-saving treatment for patients, with little to no base in medical evidence, and in some cases, clear inaccuracies written by lawmakers with no medical training. This is a call for advocacy for laws to be based on medical facts to protect and reduce mortality for some of our most vulnerable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislation Limiting Access to Electroconvulsive Therapy Is Increasing-A Call for Reasonable and Evidence-Based Legislation.\",\"authors\":\"Emily M Beydler, Lauren M Katzell, Joseph Dragonetti, Nicholas Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an increasing body of legislation that limits access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with a relative lack of directives and recommendations from psychiatrists regarding these laws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors utilized LexisNexis to examine newer legislation related to various aspects of ECT and the implications of these laws in ECT treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These laws include regulations regarding informed consent, age restrictions, and approved practitioners. All but one of these enacted laws are restrictive.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Such laws reduce the availability of this life-saving treatment for patients, with little to no base in medical evidence, and in some cases, clear inaccuracies written by lawmakers with no medical training. This is a call for advocacy for laws to be based on medical facts to protect and reduce mortality for some of our most vulnerable patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:越来越多的立法机构限制电痉挛疗法(ECT)的使用,而相对缺乏精神科医生关于这些法律的指示和建议。方法:作者利用LexisNexis来检查与电痉挛治疗的各个方面相关的新立法以及这些法律在电痉挛治疗中的含义。结果:这些法律包括关于知情同意、年龄限制和批准的从业人员的规定。这些颁布的法律中只有一条是限制性的。讨论:此类法律减少了这种挽救生命的治疗方法对病人的可用性,几乎没有医学证据基础,在某些情况下,没有接受过医学培训的立法者所写的明显不准确。我们呼吁倡导以医学事实为基础的法律,以保护和降低一些最脆弱患者的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legislation Limiting Access to Electroconvulsive Therapy Is Increasing-A Call for Reasonable and Evidence-Based Legislation.

Introduction: There is an increasing body of legislation that limits access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with a relative lack of directives and recommendations from psychiatrists regarding these laws.

Methods: The authors utilized LexisNexis to examine newer legislation related to various aspects of ECT and the implications of these laws in ECT treatment.

Results: These laws include regulations regarding informed consent, age restrictions, and approved practitioners. All but one of these enacted laws are restrictive.

Discussion: Such laws reduce the availability of this life-saving treatment for patients, with little to no base in medical evidence, and in some cases, clear inaccuracies written by lawmakers with no medical training. This is a call for advocacy for laws to be based on medical facts to protect and reduce mortality for some of our most vulnerable patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信