加强医学教育中的残障包容:基于Bronfenbrenner生态系统框架的残障资源专业人员的角色。

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000006149
Sarah E Triano, Lisa M Meeks
{"title":"加强医学教育中的残障包容:基于Bronfenbrenner生态系统框架的残障资源专业人员的角色。","authors":"Sarah E Triano, Lisa M Meeks","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In this article, the authors examine the important yet often overlooked role of specialized disability resource professionals (DRPs) in medical education. Although disability inclusion has gained momentum, disparities in accommodations, learning environments, and residency selection persist for medical students with disabilities (MSWDs). Despite national calls for institutional commitment to accessibility, only 9% of U.S. medical schools employ a dedicated DRP, leaving many MSWDs without specialized support to navigate the complexities of medical training. The authors argue that DRPs are essential not only for individual accommodation implementation but also for institutional change, including faculty development, policy reform, and the dismantling of systemic ableism in medical education.Drawing on Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, the authors propose a framework for understanding the multilevel impact of DRPs from direct student support to shaping national policies. Data from the 2024 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) highlight significant barriers in disability support services: 15.4% of students found the accommodation process overly difficult, 27.2% refrained from seeking accommodations due to stigma, and 5.1% reported unclear institutional processes for requesting accommodations. These findings underscore the necessity of specialized DRPs to enhance transparency, streamline accommodation processes, and improve faculty preparedness to support disabled learners.The authors advocate for standardized DRP competencies in medical education to ensure consistent, high-quality disability support across institutions. Without investment in specialized DRPs, inequities in medical education may persist, undermining broader efforts toward inclusion. To create a truly accessible and equitable learning environment, medical schools should move beyond compliance and recognize DRPs as indispensable to the success of all learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"S98-S104"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening Disability Inclusion in Medical Education: The Role of Disability Resource Professionals Through Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Triano, Lisa M Meeks\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In this article, the authors examine the important yet often overlooked role of specialized disability resource professionals (DRPs) in medical education. Although disability inclusion has gained momentum, disparities in accommodations, learning environments, and residency selection persist for medical students with disabilities (MSWDs). Despite national calls for institutional commitment to accessibility, only 9% of U.S. medical schools employ a dedicated DRP, leaving many MSWDs without specialized support to navigate the complexities of medical training. The authors argue that DRPs are essential not only for individual accommodation implementation but also for institutional change, including faculty development, policy reform, and the dismantling of systemic ableism in medical education.Drawing on Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, the authors propose a framework for understanding the multilevel impact of DRPs from direct student support to shaping national policies. Data from the 2024 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) highlight significant barriers in disability support services: 15.4% of students found the accommodation process overly difficult, 27.2% refrained from seeking accommodations due to stigma, and 5.1% reported unclear institutional processes for requesting accommodations. These findings underscore the necessity of specialized DRPs to enhance transparency, streamline accommodation processes, and improve faculty preparedness to support disabled learners.The authors advocate for standardized DRP competencies in medical education to ensure consistent, high-quality disability support across institutions. Without investment in specialized DRPs, inequities in medical education may persist, undermining broader efforts toward inclusion. To create a truly accessible and equitable learning environment, medical schools should move beyond compliance and recognize DRPs as indispensable to the success of all learners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"S98-S104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006149\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了残障专业人才在医学教育中重要却常被忽视的作用。虽然残疾包容的势头越来越大,但残疾医学生(MSWDs)在住宿、学习环境和住院医师选择方面的差异仍然存在。尽管全国各地都在呼吁机构对无障碍环境做出承诺,但只有9%的美国医学院聘请了专门的DRP,这使得许多mswd没有专门的支持来应对复杂的医学培训。作者认为,drp不仅对个人住宿的实施至关重要,而且对制度变革也至关重要,包括教师发展、政策改革和医学教育中系统性残疾歧视的拆除。根据布朗芬布伦纳的生态系统理论,作者提出了一个框架来理解DRPs的多层次影响,从直接的学生支持到形成国家政策。来自2024年美国医学院协会(AAMC)毕业问卷(GQ)的数据强调了残疾支持服务中的重大障碍:15.4%的学生发现住宿过程过于困难,27.2%的学生因耻辱而避免寻求住宿,5.1%的学生报告申请住宿的机构程序不明确。这些发现强调了专门drp的必要性,以提高透明度,简化住宿流程,并改善教师为支持残疾学习者所做的准备。作者主张在医学教育中标准化DRP能力,以确保跨机构的一致、高质量的残疾支持。如果不投资于专门的drp,医学教育中的不公平现象可能会持续存在,从而破坏更广泛的包容性努力。为了创造一个真正无障碍和公平的学习环境,医学院应超越遵守,并认识到drp对所有学习者的成功是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strengthening Disability Inclusion in Medical Education: The Role of Disability Resource Professionals Through Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Framework.

Abstract: In this article, the authors examine the important yet often overlooked role of specialized disability resource professionals (DRPs) in medical education. Although disability inclusion has gained momentum, disparities in accommodations, learning environments, and residency selection persist for medical students with disabilities (MSWDs). Despite national calls for institutional commitment to accessibility, only 9% of U.S. medical schools employ a dedicated DRP, leaving many MSWDs without specialized support to navigate the complexities of medical training. The authors argue that DRPs are essential not only for individual accommodation implementation but also for institutional change, including faculty development, policy reform, and the dismantling of systemic ableism in medical education.Drawing on Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, the authors propose a framework for understanding the multilevel impact of DRPs from direct student support to shaping national policies. Data from the 2024 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) highlight significant barriers in disability support services: 15.4% of students found the accommodation process overly difficult, 27.2% refrained from seeking accommodations due to stigma, and 5.1% reported unclear institutional processes for requesting accommodations. These findings underscore the necessity of specialized DRPs to enhance transparency, streamline accommodation processes, and improve faculty preparedness to support disabled learners.The authors advocate for standardized DRP competencies in medical education to ensure consistent, high-quality disability support across institutions. Without investment in specialized DRPs, inequities in medical education may persist, undermining broader efforts toward inclusion. To create a truly accessible and equitable learning environment, medical schools should move beyond compliance and recognize DRPs as indispensable to the success of all learners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信