{"title":"致编辑的信：社区凝聚力在任何地方都重要吗？对布莱恩特和伯特农村-城市研究结果的进一步思考。","authors":"Xuehao Huang","doi":"10.1111/camh.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This Letter provides commentary on the recent study by Brieant and Burt (Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 30(2), 140-148), which explored the protective role of community cohesion in mitigating mental health problems among youth facing socioeconomic disadvantage across rural and urban contexts.</p><p><strong>Commentary: </strong>While commending the authors for their valuable contribution, I highlight methodological concerns regarding the rural subgroup's limited sample size, suggesting that marginal significance in rural contexts should be interpreted cautiously. I also discuss the possibility that protective effects on internalizing symptoms may emerge later in adolescence.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Recommendations are provided for future research to incorporate more nuanced, context-sensitive measures of adversity relevant to rural settings. Finally, I emphasize the need for scalable and culturally informed community interventions and call for increased representation of rural populations in resilience research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter to the Editor: Does community cohesion matter everywhere? Further reflections on Brieant and Burt's rural-urban findings.\",\"authors\":\"Xuehao Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/camh.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This Letter provides commentary on the recent study by Brieant and Burt (Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 30(2), 140-148), which explored the protective role of community cohesion in mitigating mental health problems among youth facing socioeconomic disadvantage across rural and urban contexts.</p><p><strong>Commentary: </strong>While commending the authors for their valuable contribution, I highlight methodological concerns regarding the rural subgroup's limited sample size, suggesting that marginal significance in rural contexts should be interpreted cautiously. I also discuss the possibility that protective effects on internalizing symptoms may emerge later in adolescence.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Recommendations are provided for future research to incorporate more nuanced, context-sensitive measures of adversity relevant to rural settings. Finally, I emphasize the need for scalable and culturally informed community interventions and call for increased representation of rural populations in resilience research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Letter to the Editor: Does community cohesion matter everywhere? Further reflections on Brieant and Burt's rural-urban findings.
Objective: This Letter provides commentary on the recent study by Brieant and Burt (Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 30(2), 140-148), which explored the protective role of community cohesion in mitigating mental health problems among youth facing socioeconomic disadvantage across rural and urban contexts.
Commentary: While commending the authors for their valuable contribution, I highlight methodological concerns regarding the rural subgroup's limited sample size, suggesting that marginal significance in rural contexts should be interpreted cautiously. I also discuss the possibility that protective effects on internalizing symptoms may emerge later in adolescence.
Implications: Recommendations are provided for future research to incorporate more nuanced, context-sensitive measures of adversity relevant to rural settings. Finally, I emphasize the need for scalable and culturally informed community interventions and call for increased representation of rural populations in resilience research.
期刊介绍：
Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
