IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yi-Jen Huang, Kwua-Yun Wang, Wu-Chien Chien, Chi-Hsiang Chung, Li-Ting Kao, Senyeong Kao, Chih-Feng Chian
{"title":"Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Improves Patient Outcomes.","authors":"Yi-Jen Huang, Kwua-Yun Wang, Wu-Chien Chien, Chi-Hsiang Chung, Li-Ting Kao, Senyeong Kao, Chih-Feng Chian","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S511593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the real-world impact of LAMA+LABA combination therapy on COPD outcomes, bridging the gap between experimental data and clinical practice. It aims to assess whether the paradigm shift in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has improved patient outcomes, particularly in terms of acute exacerbations, hospitalizations, and mortality, while providing insights to guide clinical and policy decisions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzes cohorts derived from outpatient and inpatient medical records from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. It includes individuals diagnosed with COPD in two periods: 2012-2014 and 2016-2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paradigm shift in COPD treatment has led to a significant transition in medication selection, moving away from single-agent or supplementary inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens (from 99.61% to 20.99%) towards the use of dual bronchodilators or triple therapy (from 0.38% to 79.02%). The analysis between long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) revealed no statistically significant differences in emergency department visits and hospitalizations. However, LABAs were associated with a notable reduction in all-cause mortality compared to LAMAs (aHR 0.674-0.765). Additionally, the widespread adoption of dual bronchodilator therapy and the implementation of precise guidelines for ICS use have led to significant reductions in emergency department visits (aHR 0.557-0.735), decreased hospitalizations (aHR 0.610-0.725), and improved mortality outcomes (aHR 0.226-0.294) among COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The paradigm shift in treatment approaches has led to substantial improvements in patient outcomes for COPD, regardless of the treatment regimen employed. This development marks a significant advancement in enhancing both the efficacy and precision of COPD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"1965-1972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S511593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估LAMA+LABA联合治疗对COPD预后的实际影响,弥合实验数据与临床实践之间的差距。该研究旨在评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗模式的转变是否改善了患者的预后,特别是在急性加重、住院和死亡率方面,同时为指导临床和政策决策提供见解。患者与方法:本研究为回溯性研究,分析台湾全民健保研究资料库中门诊与住院病患病历资料。它包括2012-2014年和2016-2018年两个时期诊断为COPD的个体。结果:COPD治疗的范式转变导致了药物选择的重大转变,从单药或补充吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)方案(从99.61%到20.99%)转向使用双支气管扩张剂或三联治疗(从0.38%到79.02%)。对长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMAs)和长效β激动剂(LABAs)的分析显示,急诊科访问量和住院率无统计学差异。然而,与LAMAs相比,LABAs与全因死亡率显著降低相关(aHR 0.674-0.765)。此外,广泛采用双支气管扩张剂治疗和实施精确的ICS使用指南导致COPD患者急诊科就诊次数显著减少(aHR 0.557-0.735),住院次数减少(aHR 0.610-0.725),死亡率结果改善(aHR 0.226-0.294)。结论:无论采用何种治疗方案,治疗方法的范式转变已经导致COPD患者预后的实质性改善。这一进展标志着在提高慢性阻塞性肺病治疗的疗效和准确性方面取得了重大进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Improves Patient Outcomes.

Purpose: This study evaluates the real-world impact of LAMA+LABA combination therapy on COPD outcomes, bridging the gap between experimental data and clinical practice. It aims to assess whether the paradigm shift in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has improved patient outcomes, particularly in terms of acute exacerbations, hospitalizations, and mortality, while providing insights to guide clinical and policy decisions.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study analyzes cohorts derived from outpatient and inpatient medical records from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. It includes individuals diagnosed with COPD in two periods: 2012-2014 and 2016-2018.

Results: The paradigm shift in COPD treatment has led to a significant transition in medication selection, moving away from single-agent or supplementary inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens (from 99.61% to 20.99%) towards the use of dual bronchodilators or triple therapy (from 0.38% to 79.02%). The analysis between long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) revealed no statistically significant differences in emergency department visits and hospitalizations. However, LABAs were associated with a notable reduction in all-cause mortality compared to LAMAs (aHR 0.674-0.765). Additionally, the widespread adoption of dual bronchodilator therapy and the implementation of precise guidelines for ICS use have led to significant reductions in emergency department visits (aHR 0.557-0.735), decreased hospitalizations (aHR 0.610-0.725), and improved mortality outcomes (aHR 0.226-0.294) among COPD patients.

Conclusion: The paradigm shift in treatment approaches has led to substantial improvements in patient outcomes for COPD, regardless of the treatment regimen employed. This development marks a significant advancement in enhancing both the efficacy and precision of COPD management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信