{"title":"中国与菲律宾的原住民疗愈运动:非殖民与解放心理学的可能性与挑战。","authors":"Xiang Zhou, Ma Teresa Tuason","doi":"10.1037/amp0001424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to enduring historical colonialism and contemporary neocolonial influences, Indigenous Psychology movements in Asia have emerged as a counterforce to Western-centric hegemonic psychology. These movements strive for holistic healing that is deeply rooted in diverse local practices and wisdom. This introductory article positions Indigenous Psychology movements within the broader discourse on decolonial and liberation psychologies, highlighting their significance in the Chinese and Filipino cultural contexts. We briefly describe the history of these movements and explore various Indigenous healing approaches, from \"indigenizing from without\" to \"indigenizing from within,\" a conceptual framework developed by Filipino psychologist Virgilio Enriquez in 1994. While recognizing the decolonial and liberatory potential of these movements, we also confront their challenges and limitations, such as the limited scope of representation of indigeneity and insufficient focus on historical trauma and colonial mentality. We advocate for a developmental approach to understand the evolution of Indigenous Psychology movements, culminating in a stage of \"reclamation.\" The article concludes by delineating practical implications for incorporating these Indigenous perspectives into broader psychological practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"80 4","pages":"643-654"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous healing movements in China and the Philippines: Possibilities and challenges for decolonial and liberation psychologies.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Zhou, Ma Teresa Tuason\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In response to enduring historical colonialism and contemporary neocolonial influences, Indigenous Psychology movements in Asia have emerged as a counterforce to Western-centric hegemonic psychology. These movements strive for holistic healing that is deeply rooted in diverse local practices and wisdom. This introductory article positions Indigenous Psychology movements within the broader discourse on decolonial and liberation psychologies, highlighting their significance in the Chinese and Filipino cultural contexts. We briefly describe the history of these movements and explore various Indigenous healing approaches, from \\\"indigenizing from without\\\" to \\\"indigenizing from within,\\\" a conceptual framework developed by Filipino psychologist Virgilio Enriquez in 1994. While recognizing the decolonial and liberatory potential of these movements, we also confront their challenges and limitations, such as the limited scope of representation of indigeneity and insufficient focus on historical trauma and colonial mentality. We advocate for a developmental approach to understand the evolution of Indigenous Psychology movements, culminating in a stage of \\\"reclamation.\\\" The article concludes by delineating practical implications for incorporating these Indigenous perspectives into broader psychological practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"80 4\",\"pages\":\"643-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001424\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001424","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了应对历史上持久的殖民主义和当代新殖民主义的影响,亚洲的本土心理学运动已经成为一股对抗西方中心主义霸权心理学的力量。这些运动力求全面的治疗,这种治疗深深植根于不同的地方实践和智慧。这篇介绍性文章将土著心理学运动置于非殖民化和解放心理学的广泛论述中,强调了它们在中国和菲律宾文化背景下的重要性。我们简要描述了这些运动的历史,并探索了各种土著治疗方法,从“外部本土化”到“内部本土化”,这是菲律宾心理学家Virgilio Enriquez于1994年提出的概念框架。在认识到这些运动的非殖民化和解放潜力的同时,我们也面对它们的挑战和局限性,例如对土著的代表性范围有限,对历史创伤和殖民心态的关注不够。我们主张用发展的方法来理解土著心理学运动的演变,最终达到“开垦”阶段。文章最后描述了将这些土著观点纳入更广泛的心理实践的实际意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Indigenous healing movements in China and the Philippines: Possibilities and challenges for decolonial and liberation psychologies.
In response to enduring historical colonialism and contemporary neocolonial influences, Indigenous Psychology movements in Asia have emerged as a counterforce to Western-centric hegemonic psychology. These movements strive for holistic healing that is deeply rooted in diverse local practices and wisdom. This introductory article positions Indigenous Psychology movements within the broader discourse on decolonial and liberation psychologies, highlighting their significance in the Chinese and Filipino cultural contexts. We briefly describe the history of these movements and explore various Indigenous healing approaches, from "indigenizing from without" to "indigenizing from within," a conceptual framework developed by Filipino psychologist Virgilio Enriquez in 1994. While recognizing the decolonial and liberatory potential of these movements, we also confront their challenges and limitations, such as the limited scope of representation of indigeneity and insufficient focus on historical trauma and colonial mentality. We advocate for a developmental approach to understand the evolution of Indigenous Psychology movements, culminating in a stage of "reclamation." The article concludes by delineating practical implications for incorporating these Indigenous perspectives into broader psychological practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.