罪犯存在检测和基于猜测的队列选择的年龄相关差异的证据。

IF 3.5 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Carolin Mayer, Raoul Bell, Nicola Marie Menne, Amelie Therre, Ulla Lichtenhagen, Axel Buchner
{"title":"罪犯存在检测和基于猜测的队列选择的年龄相关差异的证据。","authors":"Carolin Mayer, Raoul Bell, Nicola Marie Menne, Amelie Therre, Ulla Lichtenhagen, Axel Buchner","doi":"10.1037/pag0000916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The well-validated two-high threshold eyewitness identification model was applied to examine age-related differences in the cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses to sequential lineups. In the first step, a large data set originally collected for a different purpose was reanalyzed to examine age-related differences in culprit-presence detection, culprit-absence detection, and guessing-based selection among young to middle-aged adults, young-old adults, and old-old adults. In the second step, a novel experiment was conducted to test the robustness of the conclusions from the reanalysis. The results of both analyses are fairly consistent. The probabilities of memory-based culprit-presence detection and, to some degree, culprit-absence detection decrease with age. In contrast, the probability of guessing-based selection increases with age. This shift from memory-based detection to guessing-based selection highlights potential challenges for the validity of eyewitness testimony posed by age-related differences in the cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for age-related differences in culprit-presence detection and guessing-based selection in lineups.\",\"authors\":\"Carolin Mayer, Raoul Bell, Nicola Marie Menne, Amelie Therre, Ulla Lichtenhagen, Axel Buchner\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pag0000916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The well-validated two-high threshold eyewitness identification model was applied to examine age-related differences in the cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses to sequential lineups. In the first step, a large data set originally collected for a different purpose was reanalyzed to examine age-related differences in culprit-presence detection, culprit-absence detection, and guessing-based selection among young to middle-aged adults, young-old adults, and old-old adults. In the second step, a novel experiment was conducted to test the robustness of the conclusions from the reanalysis. The results of both analyses are fairly consistent. The probabilities of memory-based culprit-presence detection and, to some degree, culprit-absence detection decrease with age. In contrast, the probability of guessing-based selection increases with age. This shift from memory-based detection to guessing-based selection highlights potential challenges for the validity of eyewitness testimony posed by age-related differences in the cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000916\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经过验证的双高阈值目击证人识别模型被用于检验目击证人对顺序排列反应的认知过程中与年龄相关的差异。在第一步中,为了不同的目的而收集的大量数据集被重新分析,以检验年轻人到中年人、年轻人和老年人在罪犯-存在检测、罪犯-不存在检测和基于猜测的选择方面的年龄相关差异。在第二步中,进行了一个新的实验来检验再分析结论的稳健性。两种分析的结果是相当一致的。在一定程度上,基于记忆的罪犯存在检测和罪犯不存在检测的概率随着年龄的增长而下降。相反,基于猜测的选择的可能性随着年龄的增长而增加。这种从基于记忆的检测到基于猜测的选择的转变,突出了目击者证词的有效性所面临的潜在挑战,这些挑战是由目击者反应背后的认知过程中与年龄相关的差异引起的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence for age-related differences in culprit-presence detection and guessing-based selection in lineups.

The well-validated two-high threshold eyewitness identification model was applied to examine age-related differences in the cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses to sequential lineups. In the first step, a large data set originally collected for a different purpose was reanalyzed to examine age-related differences in culprit-presence detection, culprit-absence detection, and guessing-based selection among young to middle-aged adults, young-old adults, and old-old adults. In the second step, a novel experiment was conducted to test the robustness of the conclusions from the reanalysis. The results of both analyses are fairly consistent. The probabilities of memory-based culprit-presence detection and, to some degree, culprit-absence detection decrease with age. In contrast, the probability of guessing-based selection increases with age. This shift from memory-based detection to guessing-based selection highlights potential challenges for the validity of eyewitness testimony posed by age-related differences in the cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信