Ivan Tokin, Dmitry Lioznov, Artem Poromov, Tatyana Zubkova, Valerii Tsvetkov, Olesya Nikitina, Olga Pobegalova, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Viktor Renev, Anastasiya Podgornaya
{"title":"高危门诊患者流感抗病毒治疗:俄罗斯常规临床实践的多中心观察性研究","authors":"Ivan Tokin, Dmitry Lioznov, Artem Poromov, Tatyana Zubkova, Valerii Tsvetkov, Olesya Nikitina, Olga Pobegalova, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Viktor Renev, Anastasiya Podgornaya","doi":"10.1177/20499361251347726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza is a significant public health challenge, characterized by severe disease progression and considerable societal burden. Patients at high risk of influenza-related complications require special attention in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of antiviral treatments for influenza on the incidence of bacterial complications, adverse events, and disease duration in high-risk outpatients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, non-interventional, observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted during the 2023-2024 influenza epidemic season and included 1867 high-risk outpatients treated with oseltamivir, umifenovir, kagocel, or imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial complications occurred in 18.87% (<i>n</i> = 335) of high-risk patients, with 17.41% (<i>n</i> = 309) requiring antibacterial therapy. The hospitalization rate was 1.24% (<i>n</i> = 22), and the average disease duration was 8 days. The incidence of bacterial complications varied among treatment groups: oseltamivir (18.96%, <i>n</i> = 102), umifenovir (12.17%%, <i>n</i> = 51), kagocel (22.00%%, <i>n</i> = 110), and imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid (22.64%%, <i>n</i> = 72). Adverse events were reported in 4.76% (<i>n</i> = 84) of patients, most commonly gastrointestinal disorders (91.67%, <i>n</i> = 77), followed by allergic reactions (8.33%, <i>n</i> = 7). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the oseltamivir group compared to other treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The etiotropic agents oseltamivir and umifenovir demonstrated comparable efficacy in managing influenza in high-risk patients, as reflected by their impact on bacterial complication rates and disease duration. Both drugs may be recommended for the treatment of high-risk influenza patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20499361251347726"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antiviral therapy for influenza in high-risk outpatients: a multicenter observational study of routine clinical practice in Russia.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Tokin, Dmitry Lioznov, Artem Poromov, Tatyana Zubkova, Valerii Tsvetkov, Olesya Nikitina, Olga Pobegalova, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Viktor Renev, Anastasiya Podgornaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20499361251347726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza is a significant public health challenge, characterized by severe disease progression and considerable societal burden. Patients at high risk of influenza-related complications require special attention in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of antiviral treatments for influenza on the incidence of bacterial complications, adverse events, and disease duration in high-risk outpatients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, non-interventional, observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted during the 2023-2024 influenza epidemic season and included 1867 high-risk outpatients treated with oseltamivir, umifenovir, kagocel, or imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial complications occurred in 18.87% (<i>n</i> = 335) of high-risk patients, with 17.41% (<i>n</i> = 309) requiring antibacterial therapy. The hospitalization rate was 1.24% (<i>n</i> = 22), and the average disease duration was 8 days. The incidence of bacterial complications varied among treatment groups: oseltamivir (18.96%, <i>n</i> = 102), umifenovir (12.17%%, <i>n</i> = 51), kagocel (22.00%%, <i>n</i> = 110), and imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid (22.64%%, <i>n</i> = 72). Adverse events were reported in 4.76% (<i>n</i> = 84) of patients, most commonly gastrointestinal disorders (91.67%, <i>n</i> = 77), followed by allergic reactions (8.33%, <i>n</i> = 7). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the oseltamivir group compared to other treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The etiotropic agents oseltamivir and umifenovir demonstrated comparable efficacy in managing influenza in high-risk patients, as reflected by their impact on bacterial complication rates and disease duration. Both drugs may be recommended for the treatment of high-risk influenza patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20499361251347726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251347726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251347726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antiviral therapy for influenza in high-risk outpatients: a multicenter observational study of routine clinical practice in Russia.
Background: Influenza is a significant public health challenge, characterized by severe disease progression and considerable societal burden. Patients at high risk of influenza-related complications require special attention in routine clinical practice.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of antiviral treatments for influenza on the incidence of bacterial complications, adverse events, and disease duration in high-risk outpatients.
Methods: The study was conducted during the 2023-2024 influenza epidemic season and included 1867 high-risk outpatients treated with oseltamivir, umifenovir, kagocel, or imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid.
Results: Bacterial complications occurred in 18.87% (n = 335) of high-risk patients, with 17.41% (n = 309) requiring antibacterial therapy. The hospitalization rate was 1.24% (n = 22), and the average disease duration was 8 days. The incidence of bacterial complications varied among treatment groups: oseltamivir (18.96%, n = 102), umifenovir (12.17%%, n = 51), kagocel (22.00%%, n = 110), and imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid (22.64%%, n = 72). Adverse events were reported in 4.76% (n = 84) of patients, most commonly gastrointestinal disorders (91.67%, n = 77), followed by allergic reactions (8.33%, n = 7). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the oseltamivir group compared to other treatments.
Conclusion: The etiotropic agents oseltamivir and umifenovir demonstrated comparable efficacy in managing influenza in high-risk patients, as reflected by their impact on bacterial complication rates and disease duration. Both drugs may be recommended for the treatment of high-risk influenza patients.