用于预防导尿管相关性尿路感染的自动间歇膀胱冲洗系统的开发和验证:一项使用猪模型的临床前研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Myungchan Park, Hyun Cheol Jeong, Sung Jin Kim, Sang Hyun Park, Jae-Seung Chung, Cheol Kyu Oh, Kyoko Sakamoto, Mahadevan Raj Rajasekaran
{"title":"用于预防导尿管相关性尿路感染的自动间歇膀胱冲洗系统的开发和验证:一项使用猪模型的临床前研究。","authors":"Myungchan Park, Hyun Cheol Jeong, Sung Jin Kim, Sang Hyun Park, Jae-Seung Chung, Cheol Kyu Oh, Kyoko Sakamoto, Mahadevan Raj Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a novel automated intermittent bladder irrigation system designed to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and manage catheter-related complications by addressing operator dependency, inconsistent outcomes, and potential complications associated with traditional techniques in patients requiring long-term catheterization, using a porcine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative evaluation method using standardized agar specimens was used to assess the clearance rate. Bladder irrigation procedures were performed on four female pigs to compare the automated system with conventional manual irrigation. Each method was tested with 13 repeated procedures per animal. The primary outcome was particle clearance rate, and the secondary outcomes were procedure time, pressure stability, and safety parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated irrigation system demonstrated superior efficacy for agar specimen removal compared with manual irrigation (94.4% vs 89.4%, p = 0.041). The automated system significantly improved procedural consistency (standard deviation: ±4.94% vs ±11.47%) and shortened irrigation time (8.2 ± 0.5 vs 12.4 ± 3.2 minutes, p < 0.001) compared with manual irrigation, despite the latter being performed by an experienced urologist. The automated system maintained stable irrigation pressures within physiological limits for all procedures, and no complications such as mucosal injury or severe hematuria were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This preclinical study demonstrated that our automated intermittent bladder irrigation system provided superior clearance rates and significantly reduced procedural variability compared to manual techniques, highlighting the importance of automation in ensuring consistent and safe clinical outcomes independent of operator variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of an Automated Intermittent Bladder Irrigation System for the Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Preclinical Study Using a Porcine Model.\",\"authors\":\"Myungchan Park, Hyun Cheol Jeong, Sung Jin Kim, Sang Hyun Park, Jae-Seung Chung, Cheol Kyu Oh, Kyoko Sakamoto, Mahadevan Raj Rajasekaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a novel automated intermittent bladder irrigation system designed to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and manage catheter-related complications by addressing operator dependency, inconsistent outcomes, and potential complications associated with traditional techniques in patients requiring long-term catheterization, using a porcine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative evaluation method using standardized agar specimens was used to assess the clearance rate. Bladder irrigation procedures were performed on four female pigs to compare the automated system with conventional manual irrigation. Each method was tested with 13 repeated procedures per animal. The primary outcome was particle clearance rate, and the secondary outcomes were procedure time, pressure stability, and safety parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated irrigation system demonstrated superior efficacy for agar specimen removal compared with manual irrigation (94.4% vs 89.4%, p = 0.041). The automated system significantly improved procedural consistency (standard deviation: ±4.94% vs ±11.47%) and shortened irrigation time (8.2 ± 0.5 vs 12.4 ± 3.2 minutes, p < 0.001) compared with manual irrigation, despite the latter being performed by an experienced urologist. The automated system maintained stable irrigation pressures within physiological limits for all procedures, and no complications such as mucosal injury or severe hematuria were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This preclinical study demonstrated that our automated intermittent bladder irrigation system provided superior clearance rates and significantly reduced procedural variability compared to manual techniques, highlighting the importance of automation in ensuring consistent and safe clinical outcomes independent of operator variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发和验证一种新型的自动间歇膀胱灌洗系统,该系统旨在通过解决操作者依赖性、不一致的结果以及需要长期导尿的患者与传统技术相关的潜在并发症,来预防导尿相关的尿路感染(CAUTI)并管理导尿相关的并发症,使用猪模型。方法:采用标准化琼脂标本定量评价方法对清除率进行评价。对4头母猪进行膀胱冲洗,以比较自动系统和传统的人工冲洗。每种方法对每只动物进行13次重复试验。主要终点是颗粒清除率,次要终点是手术时间、压力稳定性和安全性参数。结果:与人工冲洗相比,自动冲洗系统对琼脂标本的去除效果更好(94.4% vs 89.4%, p = 0.041)。与人工冲洗相比,自动化系统显著提高了操作一致性(标准差:±4.94% vs±11.47%),缩短了冲洗时间(8.2±0.5 vs 12.4±3.2分钟,p < 0.001),尽管后者是由经验丰富的泌尿科医生进行的。自动化系统在所有操作过程中保持了生理范围内稳定的冲洗压力,两组均未出现粘膜损伤或严重血尿等并发症。结论:这项临床前研究表明,与人工技术相比,我们的自动间歇膀胱灌洗系统提供了更高的清除率,并显著减少了程序上的可变性,强调了自动化在确保不受操作变量影响的一致和安全的临床结果方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of an Automated Intermittent Bladder Irrigation System for the Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Preclinical Study Using a Porcine Model.

Objective: To develop and validate a novel automated intermittent bladder irrigation system designed to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and manage catheter-related complications by addressing operator dependency, inconsistent outcomes, and potential complications associated with traditional techniques in patients requiring long-term catheterization, using a porcine model.

Methods: A quantitative evaluation method using standardized agar specimens was used to assess the clearance rate. Bladder irrigation procedures were performed on four female pigs to compare the automated system with conventional manual irrigation. Each method was tested with 13 repeated procedures per animal. The primary outcome was particle clearance rate, and the secondary outcomes were procedure time, pressure stability, and safety parameters.

Results: The automated irrigation system demonstrated superior efficacy for agar specimen removal compared with manual irrigation (94.4% vs 89.4%, p = 0.041). The automated system significantly improved procedural consistency (standard deviation: ±4.94% vs ±11.47%) and shortened irrigation time (8.2 ± 0.5 vs 12.4 ± 3.2 minutes, p < 0.001) compared with manual irrigation, despite the latter being performed by an experienced urologist. The automated system maintained stable irrigation pressures within physiological limits for all procedures, and no complications such as mucosal injury or severe hematuria were observed in either group.

Conclusions: This preclinical study demonstrated that our automated intermittent bladder irrigation system provided superior clearance rates and significantly reduced procedural variability compared to manual techniques, highlighting the importance of automation in ensuring consistent and safe clinical outcomes independent of operator variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信