Lea Alexandra Müller Karoza, Sandro Luca Wiesmann, Melissa Lê-Hoa Võ
{"title":"锚定对象在场景功能理解中的作用。","authors":"Lea Alexandra Müller Karoza, Sandro Luca Wiesmann, Melissa Lê-Hoa Võ","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-04122-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Throughout every day, we perform actions, and action information has been suggested to inform scene categorization. Here we hypothesise that actions also drive the hierarchical structure of many scenes, where anchor objects (e.g., stoves) predict the presence and position of local objects (e.g., pots) by dividing a scene in functionally distinct 'phrases'. Specifically, we test whether the presence of anchor objects informs scene function understanding. In Experiment 1, participants matched an action word and a scene from which we either removed an action-related anchor object (REL), an action-unrelated anchor (UNREL) or a non-anchor object (RAND). Matching performance was impaired in REL compared to UNREL and RAND. Experiment 2 measured scene function activation more implicitly by priming a lexical decision task (LDT) on action words with the same stimuli (including an inconsistent condition: INCON, e.g., \"cooking\" in a bathroom). LDT performance was impaired after INCON and REL compared to RAND and UNREL primes. A control experiment showed that this effect was partly but not solely due to scene categorization. The results imply that understanding scene function is most closely tied to anchor objects directly relevant for actions whereas contextual scene information is not always sufficient to give rise to this understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"20247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of anchor objects in scene function understanding.\",\"authors\":\"Lea Alexandra Müller Karoza, Sandro Luca Wiesmann, Melissa Lê-Hoa Võ\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-04122-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Throughout every day, we perform actions, and action information has been suggested to inform scene categorization. Here we hypothesise that actions also drive the hierarchical structure of many scenes, where anchor objects (e.g., stoves) predict the presence and position of local objects (e.g., pots) by dividing a scene in functionally distinct 'phrases'. Specifically, we test whether the presence of anchor objects informs scene function understanding. In Experiment 1, participants matched an action word and a scene from which we either removed an action-related anchor object (REL), an action-unrelated anchor (UNREL) or a non-anchor object (RAND). Matching performance was impaired in REL compared to UNREL and RAND. Experiment 2 measured scene function activation more implicitly by priming a lexical decision task (LDT) on action words with the same stimuli (including an inconsistent condition: INCON, e.g., \\\"cooking\\\" in a bathroom). LDT performance was impaired after INCON and REL compared to RAND and UNREL primes. A control experiment showed that this effect was partly but not solely due to scene categorization. The results imply that understanding scene function is most closely tied to anchor objects directly relevant for actions whereas contextual scene information is not always sufficient to give rise to this understanding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"20247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04122-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04122-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of anchor objects in scene function understanding.
Throughout every day, we perform actions, and action information has been suggested to inform scene categorization. Here we hypothesise that actions also drive the hierarchical structure of many scenes, where anchor objects (e.g., stoves) predict the presence and position of local objects (e.g., pots) by dividing a scene in functionally distinct 'phrases'. Specifically, we test whether the presence of anchor objects informs scene function understanding. In Experiment 1, participants matched an action word and a scene from which we either removed an action-related anchor object (REL), an action-unrelated anchor (UNREL) or a non-anchor object (RAND). Matching performance was impaired in REL compared to UNREL and RAND. Experiment 2 measured scene function activation more implicitly by priming a lexical decision task (LDT) on action words with the same stimuli (including an inconsistent condition: INCON, e.g., "cooking" in a bathroom). LDT performance was impaired after INCON and REL compared to RAND and UNREL primes. A control experiment showed that this effect was partly but not solely due to scene categorization. The results imply that understanding scene function is most closely tied to anchor objects directly relevant for actions whereas contextual scene information is not always sufficient to give rise to this understanding.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.