Laimdota Zizmare, Ute Hofmann, Mohamed Ali Jarboui, Franziska Klose, Sabine Fraschka, Jakob Matthes, Marcel Krüger, Elke Schaeffeler, Matthias Schwab, Marius Ueffing, Bernd J Pichler, Karsten Boldt, Nicolas Casadei, Christoph Trautwein
{"title":"低温小鼠组织均质作为替代新鲜冷冻活检用于基因组学,转录组学,蛋白质组学和代谢组学。","authors":"Laimdota Zizmare, Ute Hofmann, Mohamed Ali Jarboui, Franziska Klose, Sabine Fraschka, Jakob Matthes, Marcel Krüger, Elke Schaeffeler, Matthias Schwab, Marius Ueffing, Bernd J Pichler, Karsten Boldt, Nicolas Casadei, Christoph Trautwein","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-06438-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The classical approach of using adjacent pieces of fresh-frozen tissue for various omics analysis from the same sample possesses a risk of biological mismatch between arising from intrinsic tissue heterogeneity. We propose an alternative approach of tissue cryogenic pulverization and lyophilization before distribution for omics studies for a more reliable analysis. Here, we compare individual omics layer readouts from fresh-frozen adjacent tissue pieces and homogenized powder in mouse brain, kidney, and liver. Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses showed comparable RNA integrity, DNA methylation, and coverage of transcripts, proteins, and metabolites across both methods. Moreover, the homogenized-lyophilized powder usage led to reduced heterogeneity between biological replicates. We conclude that the cryogenically pulverized-lyophilized tissue approach not only maintains a critical molecular feature coverage and quality but also provides a homogenous basis for various omics analysis enhancing reproducibility, sample transport, storage and enabling multi omics base on one and the same tissue aliquot.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"20254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryogenic mouse tissue homogenization as an alternative to fresh-frozen biopsy use for genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics.\",\"authors\":\"Laimdota Zizmare, Ute Hofmann, Mohamed Ali Jarboui, Franziska Klose, Sabine Fraschka, Jakob Matthes, Marcel Krüger, Elke Schaeffeler, Matthias Schwab, Marius Ueffing, Bernd J Pichler, Karsten Boldt, Nicolas Casadei, Christoph Trautwein\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-06438-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The classical approach of using adjacent pieces of fresh-frozen tissue for various omics analysis from the same sample possesses a risk of biological mismatch between arising from intrinsic tissue heterogeneity. We propose an alternative approach of tissue cryogenic pulverization and lyophilization before distribution for omics studies for a more reliable analysis. Here, we compare individual omics layer readouts from fresh-frozen adjacent tissue pieces and homogenized powder in mouse brain, kidney, and liver. Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses showed comparable RNA integrity, DNA methylation, and coverage of transcripts, proteins, and metabolites across both methods. Moreover, the homogenized-lyophilized powder usage led to reduced heterogeneity between biological replicates. We conclude that the cryogenically pulverized-lyophilized tissue approach not only maintains a critical molecular feature coverage and quality but also provides a homogenous basis for various omics analysis enhancing reproducibility, sample transport, storage and enabling multi omics base on one and the same tissue aliquot.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"20254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06438-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06438-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cryogenic mouse tissue homogenization as an alternative to fresh-frozen biopsy use for genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics.
The classical approach of using adjacent pieces of fresh-frozen tissue for various omics analysis from the same sample possesses a risk of biological mismatch between arising from intrinsic tissue heterogeneity. We propose an alternative approach of tissue cryogenic pulverization and lyophilization before distribution for omics studies for a more reliable analysis. Here, we compare individual omics layer readouts from fresh-frozen adjacent tissue pieces and homogenized powder in mouse brain, kidney, and liver. Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses showed comparable RNA integrity, DNA methylation, and coverage of transcripts, proteins, and metabolites across both methods. Moreover, the homogenized-lyophilized powder usage led to reduced heterogeneity between biological replicates. We conclude that the cryogenically pulverized-lyophilized tissue approach not only maintains a critical molecular feature coverage and quality but also provides a homogenous basis for various omics analysis enhancing reproducibility, sample transport, storage and enabling multi omics base on one and the same tissue aliquot.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.