IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121251348374
Karina Karolina De Santis, Lisa Stiens, Lara Christianson, Sarah Forberger
{"title":"Recommender systems for obesity prevention: Scoping review of reviews.","authors":"Karina Karolina De Santis, Lisa Stiens, Lara Christianson, Sarah Forberger","doi":"10.1177/20503121251348374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recommender systems are technology-based systems that generate recommendations or guide users to relevant information. This study is a scoping review aiming to describe what is known about the recommender systems for obesity prevention according to systematic reviews on this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA ScR) guideline. Out of 148 records labeled as reviews in the database and online searches until October 2023, 10 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria according to the Population, Concept, and Context framework: Population (human), Concept (recommender systems), and Context (obesity prevention). Bibliographic, population, concept, and context characteristics, and topics addressed in reviews were charted and synthesized using relative frequencies or described narratively. An overlap that occurs when the same primary studies are included in multiple reviews was assessed as the overall Corrected Covered Area (CCA: 0%-5% low overlap to ⩾15% very high overlap).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reviews were published between 2017 and 2023 and included 308 primary studies. The overlap in primary studies among the 10 reviews was low (CCA = 1.29%). The reviews described the recommender system properties (<i>n</i> = 8) or their implementation (<i>n</i> = 2) in any (<i>n</i> = 6) or specific populations (e.g., elderly; <i>n</i> = 4) and focused on nutrition (<i>n</i> = 9) and physical activity (<i>n</i> = 4) within obesity prevention context. The topics addressed in reviews were recommendation generation (i.e., technical system properties; <i>n</i> = 9), health content (e.g., nutritional advice; <i>n</i> = 7), and implementation (i.e., system evaluation and user application; <i>n</i> = 5). The evidence gaps included the need for new system development and evaluation (<i>n</i> = 8) and a focus on diverse health contexts (<i>n</i> = 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence from past reviews suggests that despite the existence of several technical solutions, there is yet no consensus on how to generate the most accurate nutrition recommendations in the obesity prevention context. Future studies addressing system and user outcome evaluation are needed to identify the optimal parameters for any long-term behavior change in recommender system users.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"20503121251348374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121251348374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:推荐系统是一种基于技术的系统,它产生推荐或引导用户获取相关信息。本研究是一项范围综述,旨在根据这一主题的系统综述,描述关于预防肥胖的推荐系统的已知情况。方法:本范围评价遵循范围评价系统评价和元分析扩展首选报告项目(PRISMA ScR)指南。截至2023年10月,在数据库和在线搜索中标记为评论的148条记录中,有10条评论符合人口、概念和背景框架的纳入标准:人口(人类)、概念(推荐系统)和背景(肥胖预防)。参考书目、人口、概念和上下文特征以及综述中涉及的主题被绘制成图表,并使用相对频率进行综合或叙述。当相同的初级研究被纳入多个审查时,发生的重叠被评估为总体校正覆盖区域(CCA: 0%-5%低重叠到小于或等于15%非常高重叠)。结果:这些综述发表于2017年至2023年之间,包括308项主要研究。10篇综述的主要研究重叠率较低(CCA = 1.29%)。这些综述描述了推荐系统的特性(n = 8)或它们在任何(n = 6)或特定人群(如老年人;N = 4),重点关注肥胖预防背景下的营养(N = 9)和身体活动(N = 4)。审查中讨论的主题是推荐生成(即技术系统属性;N = 9)、健康内容(如营养建议;N = 7),实施(即系统评价和用户应用;n = 5)。证据差距包括需要开发和评价新系统(n = 8)和关注不同的卫生环境(n = 4)。结论:以往综述的证据表明,尽管存在几种技术解决方案,但在如何在肥胖预防方面产生最准确的营养建议方面尚未达成共识。未来的研究需要解决系统和用户结果评估,以确定推荐系统用户任何长期行为变化的最佳参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommender systems for obesity prevention: Scoping review of reviews.

Introduction: Recommender systems are technology-based systems that generate recommendations or guide users to relevant information. This study is a scoping review aiming to describe what is known about the recommender systems for obesity prevention according to systematic reviews on this topic.

Methods: This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA ScR) guideline. Out of 148 records labeled as reviews in the database and online searches until October 2023, 10 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria according to the Population, Concept, and Context framework: Population (human), Concept (recommender systems), and Context (obesity prevention). Bibliographic, population, concept, and context characteristics, and topics addressed in reviews were charted and synthesized using relative frequencies or described narratively. An overlap that occurs when the same primary studies are included in multiple reviews was assessed as the overall Corrected Covered Area (CCA: 0%-5% low overlap to ⩾15% very high overlap).

Results: The reviews were published between 2017 and 2023 and included 308 primary studies. The overlap in primary studies among the 10 reviews was low (CCA = 1.29%). The reviews described the recommender system properties (n = 8) or their implementation (n = 2) in any (n = 6) or specific populations (e.g., elderly; n = 4) and focused on nutrition (n = 9) and physical activity (n = 4) within obesity prevention context. The topics addressed in reviews were recommendation generation (i.e., technical system properties; n = 9), health content (e.g., nutritional advice; n = 7), and implementation (i.e., system evaluation and user application; n = 5). The evidence gaps included the need for new system development and evaluation (n = 8) and a focus on diverse health contexts (n = 4).

Conclusion: Evidence from past reviews suggests that despite the existence of several technical solutions, there is yet no consensus on how to generate the most accurate nutrition recommendations in the obesity prevention context. Future studies addressing system and user outcome evaluation are needed to identify the optimal parameters for any long-term behavior change in recommender system users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信