澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母的创伤后应激症状:国际创伤问卷(ITQ)和精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版(PCL-5)的创伤后应激障碍检查表的因素结构

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kylie Hinde, Gert Martin Hald, David Hallford, John Gilmour, Mikkel Arendt, Silvia Pavan, David Austin
{"title":"澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母的创伤后应激症状:国际创伤问卷(ITQ)和精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版(PCL-5)的创伤后应激障碍检查表的因素结构","authors":"Kylie Hinde, Gert Martin Hald, David Hallford, John Gilmour, Mikkel Arendt, Silvia Pavan, David Austin","doi":"10.1037/tra0001959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research indicates that parents of autistic children may have a higher risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than parents of neurotypical children. This study was to determine the optimal factor structure of two trauma screening assessments: the PTSD Checklist for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5)</i> and the International Trauma Questionnaire, within this parent population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis examined and compared one novel <i>DSM-5</i> model and 14 previously identified <i>DSM-5</i> and <i>International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11)</i> trauma symptom models among Australian parents of autistic children (<i>N</i> = 563).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three <i>DSM-5</i> PTSD models (anhedonia, hybrid, and intrusion/distress) provided a marginal fit, with the novel intrusion/distress model offering a superior fit. None of the five <i>DSM-5</i> models tested achieved a good overall fit. For <i>ICD-11</i>, a three-factor model best fit the latent structure of PTSD symptoms. For complex PTSD (CPTSD), a two-factor second-order model and a six-factor first-order model provided a superior fit over five alternative CPTSD models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results strongly support the internal reliability and construct validity of the <i>ICD-11</i> PTSD and CPTSD models in Australian parents of autistic children, as measured by the International Trauma Questionnaire. The <i>ICD-11</i> models outperformed the best <i>DSM-5</i> models, highlighting their superiority for this population. While more complex <i>DSM-5</i> models showed better fit than simpler ones, they still did not achieve a good overall fit. Notably, the results were largely consistent when assessing individuals meeting Criterion A for PTSD, specifically in relation to parenting-related traumatic experiences. The International Trauma Questionnaire is a more reliable and suitable tool for assessing PTSD and CPTSD in Australian parents of autistic children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posttraumatic stress symptoms in Australian parents of autistic children: Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PCL-5).\",\"authors\":\"Kylie Hinde, Gert Martin Hald, David Hallford, John Gilmour, Mikkel Arendt, Silvia Pavan, David Austin\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research indicates that parents of autistic children may have a higher risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than parents of neurotypical children. This study was to determine the optimal factor structure of two trauma screening assessments: the PTSD Checklist for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5)</i> and the International Trauma Questionnaire, within this parent population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis examined and compared one novel <i>DSM-5</i> model and 14 previously identified <i>DSM-5</i> and <i>International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11)</i> trauma symptom models among Australian parents of autistic children (<i>N</i> = 563).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three <i>DSM-5</i> PTSD models (anhedonia, hybrid, and intrusion/distress) provided a marginal fit, with the novel intrusion/distress model offering a superior fit. None of the five <i>DSM-5</i> models tested achieved a good overall fit. For <i>ICD-11</i>, a three-factor model best fit the latent structure of PTSD symptoms. For complex PTSD (CPTSD), a two-factor second-order model and a six-factor first-order model provided a superior fit over five alternative CPTSD models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results strongly support the internal reliability and construct validity of the <i>ICD-11</i> PTSD and CPTSD models in Australian parents of autistic children, as measured by the International Trauma Questionnaire. The <i>ICD-11</i> models outperformed the best <i>DSM-5</i> models, highlighting their superiority for this population. While more complex <i>DSM-5</i> models showed better fit than simpler ones, they still did not achieve a good overall fit. Notably, the results were largely consistent when assessing individuals meeting Criterion A for PTSD, specifically in relation to parenting-related traumatic experiences. The International Trauma Questionnaire is a more reliable and suitable tool for assessing PTSD and CPTSD in Australian parents of autistic children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001959\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究表明自闭症儿童的父母患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险高于正常儿童的父母。本研究旨在确定两种创伤筛查评估的最佳因素结构:《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的创伤后应激障碍检查表和国际创伤问卷。方法:验证性因素分析对澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母(N = 563)的一个新的DSM-5模型和14个先前确定的DSM-5和国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)创伤症状模型进行了检验和比较。结果:三种DSM-5创伤后应激障碍模型(快感缺乏、混合型和入侵/痛苦)提供了边际拟合,新的入侵/痛苦模型提供了更好的拟合。测试的五种DSM-5模型都没有达到良好的整体契合。对于ICD-11,三因素模型最适合PTSD症状的潜在结构。对于复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD),两因素二阶模型和六因素一阶模型的拟合效果优于其他五种CPTSD模型。结论:采用国际创伤问卷对澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母的ICD-11 PTSD和CPTSD模型进行了测量,结果强烈支持其内部信度和结构效度。ICD-11模型优于最好的DSM-5模型,突出了它们在这一人群中的优势。虽然更复杂的DSM-5模型比简单的模型显示出更好的拟合,但它们仍然没有达到良好的整体拟合。值得注意的是,在评估符合PTSD标准A的个体时,尤其是与养育子女相关的创伤经历时,结果基本一致。国际创伤问卷是评估澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母PTSD和CPTSD的更可靠和合适的工具。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posttraumatic stress symptoms in Australian parents of autistic children: Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PCL-5).

Objective: Research indicates that parents of autistic children may have a higher risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than parents of neurotypical children. This study was to determine the optimal factor structure of two trauma screening assessments: the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) and the International Trauma Questionnaire, within this parent population.

Method: Confirmatory factor analysis examined and compared one novel DSM-5 model and 14 previously identified DSM-5 and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) trauma symptom models among Australian parents of autistic children (N = 563).

Results: Three DSM-5 PTSD models (anhedonia, hybrid, and intrusion/distress) provided a marginal fit, with the novel intrusion/distress model offering a superior fit. None of the five DSM-5 models tested achieved a good overall fit. For ICD-11, a three-factor model best fit the latent structure of PTSD symptoms. For complex PTSD (CPTSD), a two-factor second-order model and a six-factor first-order model provided a superior fit over five alternative CPTSD models.

Conclusions: Results strongly support the internal reliability and construct validity of the ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD models in Australian parents of autistic children, as measured by the International Trauma Questionnaire. The ICD-11 models outperformed the best DSM-5 models, highlighting their superiority for this population. While more complex DSM-5 models showed better fit than simpler ones, they still did not achieve a good overall fit. Notably, the results were largely consistent when assessing individuals meeting Criterion A for PTSD, specifically in relation to parenting-related traumatic experiences. The International Trauma Questionnaire is a more reliable and suitable tool for assessing PTSD and CPTSD in Australian parents of autistic children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信