Mary L Duet, Eric Zeng, Michael K Boyajian, Donald T Browne, Abigail Peoples, Marion Tapp, Robert Siska, Thomas Steele, Bennett W Calder, Christopher Runyan, Lisa R David
{"title":"一种新型无缝线引流固定装置的首次人体试验:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Mary L Duet, Eric Zeng, Michael K Boyajian, Donald T Browne, Abigail Peoples, Marion Tapp, Robert Siska, Thomas Steele, Bennett W Calder, Christopher Runyan, Lisa R David","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suture-based drain securement is nonstandardized and causes discomfort, particularly at the site of fixation as drain movement is transmitted to a focal point. Patients may experience skin irritation, pain, skin tugging, and loosening or unintended loss of the drain. A novel sutureless drain securement device, K-LOCK, was designed with patient safety and comfort in mind to reduce risks associated with drain displacement and loss, potentially leading to complications or additional interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional review board approval, 21 patients were enrolled in a randomized control trial after obtaining informed consent. Inclusion criteria required patients to be 18 years of age or older and undergoing a surgery involving placement of bilateral drains. Those with adhesive allergies were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive a right or left K-LOCK with the contralateral site undergoing suture-based drain securement. Outcomes included time to secure drains, adverse outcomes, patient satisfaction, and a blinded evaluation of skin sites at drain removal. Analysis was performed using paired <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No drain securement failure was encountered. The average duration of drain placement was 9 days. Securement of the K-LOCK was significantly faster (<i>P</i> = 0.0008) when compared with traditional suture. Blinded skin site evaluations concluded there was no significant difference in erythema and blistering (<i>P</i> = 0.9384, <i>P</i> = 0.6058, respectively). Patients overwhelmingly favored the K-LOCK in all surveyed categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-LOCK enhances the patient experience with surgical drains and offers a reliable, standardized alternative to traditional drain securement. Although these findings are promising, larger multicenter trials with long-term follow-up will be necessary to comprehensively assess the device.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6888"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-in-human Testing of a Novel Sutureless Drain Securement Device: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mary L Duet, Eric Zeng, Michael K Boyajian, Donald T Browne, Abigail Peoples, Marion Tapp, Robert Siska, Thomas Steele, Bennett W Calder, Christopher Runyan, Lisa R David\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suture-based drain securement is nonstandardized and causes discomfort, particularly at the site of fixation as drain movement is transmitted to a focal point. Patients may experience skin irritation, pain, skin tugging, and loosening or unintended loss of the drain. A novel sutureless drain securement device, K-LOCK, was designed with patient safety and comfort in mind to reduce risks associated with drain displacement and loss, potentially leading to complications or additional interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional review board approval, 21 patients were enrolled in a randomized control trial after obtaining informed consent. Inclusion criteria required patients to be 18 years of age or older and undergoing a surgery involving placement of bilateral drains. Those with adhesive allergies were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive a right or left K-LOCK with the contralateral site undergoing suture-based drain securement. Outcomes included time to secure drains, adverse outcomes, patient satisfaction, and a blinded evaluation of skin sites at drain removal. Analysis was performed using paired <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No drain securement failure was encountered. The average duration of drain placement was 9 days. Securement of the K-LOCK was significantly faster (<i>P</i> = 0.0008) when compared with traditional suture. Blinded skin site evaluations concluded there was no significant difference in erythema and blistering (<i>P</i> = 0.9384, <i>P</i> = 0.6058, respectively). Patients overwhelmingly favored the K-LOCK in all surveyed categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-LOCK enhances the patient experience with surgical drains and offers a reliable, standardized alternative to traditional drain securement. Although these findings are promising, larger multicenter trials with long-term follow-up will be necessary to comprehensively assess the device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"e6888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:基于缝线的引流固定是不规范的,会引起不适,特别是在固定部位,因为引流移动转移到一个焦点。患者可能会出现皮肤刺激、疼痛、皮肤拉扯、引流管松动或意外丢失。一种新型的无缝线引流固定装置,K-LOCK,在设计时考虑到患者的安全性和舒适性,以减少与引流移位和丢失相关的风险,可能导致并发症或额外的干预措施。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,21例患者在获得知情同意后入组随机对照试验。纳入标准要求患者年满18岁或以上,并正在进行涉及双侧引流管放置的手术。对粘接剂过敏者排除在外。患者随机接受右侧或左侧K-LOCK,对侧部位进行基于缝合线的引流固定。结果包括固定引流管的时间、不良结果、患者满意度和引流管移除时皮肤部位的盲法评估。采用配对t检验进行分析。结果:无排水孔固定故障。引流管放置的平均时间为9天。与传统缝合相比,K-LOCK的固定速度明显更快(P = 0.0008)。盲法皮肤部位评价结果显示,两组在红斑和水泡方面差异无统计学意义(P = 0.9384, P = 0.6058)。在所有被调查的类别中,绝大多数患者都喜欢K-LOCK。结论:K-LOCK提高了手术引流的患者体验,为传统引流固定提供了可靠、标准化的替代方案。虽然这些发现很有希望,但需要更大规模的多中心长期随访试验来全面评估该设备。
First-in-human Testing of a Novel Sutureless Drain Securement Device: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Background: Suture-based drain securement is nonstandardized and causes discomfort, particularly at the site of fixation as drain movement is transmitted to a focal point. Patients may experience skin irritation, pain, skin tugging, and loosening or unintended loss of the drain. A novel sutureless drain securement device, K-LOCK, was designed with patient safety and comfort in mind to reduce risks associated with drain displacement and loss, potentially leading to complications or additional interventions.
Methods: After institutional review board approval, 21 patients were enrolled in a randomized control trial after obtaining informed consent. Inclusion criteria required patients to be 18 years of age or older and undergoing a surgery involving placement of bilateral drains. Those with adhesive allergies were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive a right or left K-LOCK with the contralateral site undergoing suture-based drain securement. Outcomes included time to secure drains, adverse outcomes, patient satisfaction, and a blinded evaluation of skin sites at drain removal. Analysis was performed using paired t tests.
Results: No drain securement failure was encountered. The average duration of drain placement was 9 days. Securement of the K-LOCK was significantly faster (P = 0.0008) when compared with traditional suture. Blinded skin site evaluations concluded there was no significant difference in erythema and blistering (P = 0.9384, P = 0.6058, respectively). Patients overwhelmingly favored the K-LOCK in all surveyed categories.
Conclusions: The K-LOCK enhances the patient experience with surgical drains and offers a reliable, standardized alternative to traditional drain securement. Although these findings are promising, larger multicenter trials with long-term follow-up will be necessary to comprehensively assess the device.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.