超越LDL- c:中国纵向队列中不一致的小密度LDL胆固醇分层高血压风险。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Xiaofei Wu, Chunfang Ma, Weihai Chen, Shan Liu, Hao Shen, Xiangxiang Li
{"title":"超越LDL- c:中国纵向队列中不一致的小密度LDL胆固醇分层高血压风险。","authors":"Xiaofei Wu, Chunfang Ma, Weihai Chen, Shan Liu, Hao Shen, Xiangxiang Li","doi":"10.1186/s12944-025-02637-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This longitudinal study investigated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and its discordance with ‌low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as predictors of hypertension (HTN) incidence in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sampson's equation was used to calculate sdLDL-C‌. Using data from 4,574 adults aged ≥ 45 from the ‌China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)‌, participants were stratified into three groups by sdLDL-C‌/LDL-C‌ percentile divergence (≥ 10%): discordantly low sdLDL-C, concordant, and discordantly high sdLDL-C. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between sdLDL-C and HTN, adjusting for potential confounders. Additionally, we compared the LDL-C values derived from the Sampson equation with those measured by the homogeneous assay employed in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 9 years, 1,826 (39.9%) developed HTN‌. Cox regression adjusted for confounders showed baseline log-transformed sdLDL-C independently predicted HTN risk (hazard ratio [HR]‌ = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]‌:1.17-1.57). The discordantly high sdLDL-C group had 24% higher HTN risk versus the discordantly low group (‌HR‌ = 1.28, 95% ‌CI‌:1.13-1.45). Stratification by three LDL-C clinical thresholds and median values revealed individuals with low LDL-C but high sdLDL-C had the highest HTN risk (vs. low LDL-C/low sdLDL-C reference group in fully adjusted models). Despite strong correlation (Spearman's r = 0.956), systematic biases between direct LDL-C and Sampson methods may limit clinical interchangeability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>sdLDL-C, particularly its discordance with LDL-C, is independently associated with incident HTN risk in Chinese adults. These findings underscore sdLDL-C's potential to refine cardiovascular risk stratification and enhance precision prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18073,"journal":{"name":"Lipids in Health and Disease","volume":"24 1","pages":"221"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond LDL-C: discordant small dense LDL cholesterol stratifies hypertension risk in a Chinese longitudinal cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofei Wu, Chunfang Ma, Weihai Chen, Shan Liu, Hao Shen, Xiangxiang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12944-025-02637-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This longitudinal study investigated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and its discordance with ‌low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as predictors of hypertension (HTN) incidence in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sampson's equation was used to calculate sdLDL-C‌. Using data from 4,574 adults aged ≥ 45 from the ‌China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)‌, participants were stratified into three groups by sdLDL-C‌/LDL-C‌ percentile divergence (≥ 10%): discordantly low sdLDL-C, concordant, and discordantly high sdLDL-C. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between sdLDL-C and HTN, adjusting for potential confounders. Additionally, we compared the LDL-C values derived from the Sampson equation with those measured by the homogeneous assay employed in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 9 years, 1,826 (39.9%) developed HTN‌. Cox regression adjusted for confounders showed baseline log-transformed sdLDL-C independently predicted HTN risk (hazard ratio [HR]‌ = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]‌:1.17-1.57). The discordantly high sdLDL-C group had 24% higher HTN risk versus the discordantly low group (‌HR‌ = 1.28, 95% ‌CI‌:1.13-1.45). Stratification by three LDL-C clinical thresholds and median values revealed individuals with low LDL-C but high sdLDL-C had the highest HTN risk (vs. low LDL-C/low sdLDL-C reference group in fully adjusted models). Despite strong correlation (Spearman's r = 0.956), systematic biases between direct LDL-C and Sampson methods may limit clinical interchangeability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>sdLDL-C, particularly its discordance with LDL-C, is independently associated with incident HTN risk in Chinese adults. These findings underscore sdLDL-C's potential to refine cardiovascular risk stratification and enhance precision prevention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lipids in Health and Disease\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lipids in Health and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-025-02637-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lipids in Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-025-02637-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本纵向研究调查了小密度低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(sdLDL-C)及其与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)作为中国人群高血压(HTN)发病率预测因子的不一致性。方法:采用Sampson公式计算sdLDL-C。使用来自中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的4574名年龄≥45岁的成年人的数据,根据sdLDL-C和LDL-C百分位数差异(≥10%)将参与者分为三组:不协调的低sdLDL-C组、一致组和不协调的高sdLDL-C组。采用Cox回归分析检验sdLDL-C与HTN之间的关系,并对潜在混杂因素进行调整。此外,我们比较了由Sampson方程得出的LDL-C值与本研究中采用的均质法测量的值。结果:9年内,1826例(39.9%)发生HTN。经混杂因素校正的Cox回归显示,基线对数转换后的sdLDL-C独立预测HTN风险(风险比[HR]] = 1.36, 95%可信区间[CI]]:1.17-1.57)。高sdLDL-C组与低sdLDL-C组相比,HTN风险高24% (HR = 1.28, 95% CI:1.13-1.45)。三个LDL-C临床阈值和中位数分层显示低LDL-C但高sdLDL-C的个体HTN风险最高(与完全调整模型中的低LDL-C/低sdLDL-C对照组相比)。尽管相关性很强(Spearman’s r = 0.956),但直接LDL-C和Sampson方法之间的系统性偏差可能会限制临床互换性。结论:sdLDL-C,特别是与LDL-C的不一致性,与中国成人HTN发生风险独立相关。这些发现强调了sdLDL-C在改善心血管风险分层和加强精确预防策略方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond LDL-C: discordant small dense LDL cholesterol stratifies hypertension risk in a Chinese longitudinal cohort.

Background: This longitudinal study investigated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and its discordance with ‌low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as predictors of hypertension (HTN) incidence in a Chinese population.

Methods: Sampson's equation was used to calculate sdLDL-C‌. Using data from 4,574 adults aged ≥ 45 from the ‌China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)‌, participants were stratified into three groups by sdLDL-C‌/LDL-C‌ percentile divergence (≥ 10%): discordantly low sdLDL-C, concordant, and discordantly high sdLDL-C. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between sdLDL-C and HTN, adjusting for potential confounders. Additionally, we compared the LDL-C values derived from the Sampson equation with those measured by the homogeneous assay employed in this study.

Results: Over 9 years, 1,826 (39.9%) developed HTN‌. Cox regression adjusted for confounders showed baseline log-transformed sdLDL-C independently predicted HTN risk (hazard ratio [HR]‌ = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]‌:1.17-1.57). The discordantly high sdLDL-C group had 24% higher HTN risk versus the discordantly low group (‌HR‌ = 1.28, 95% ‌CI‌:1.13-1.45). Stratification by three LDL-C clinical thresholds and median values revealed individuals with low LDL-C but high sdLDL-C had the highest HTN risk (vs. low LDL-C/low sdLDL-C reference group in fully adjusted models). Despite strong correlation (Spearman's r = 0.956), systematic biases between direct LDL-C and Sampson methods may limit clinical interchangeability.

Conclusion: sdLDL-C, particularly its discordance with LDL-C, is independently associated with incident HTN risk in Chinese adults. These findings underscore sdLDL-C's potential to refine cardiovascular risk stratification and enhance precision prevention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lipids in Health and Disease
Lipids in Health and Disease 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lipids in Health and Disease is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal that publishes articles on all aspects of lipids: their biochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, role in health and disease, and the synthesis of new lipid compounds. Lipids in Health and Disease is aimed at all scientists, health professionals and physicians interested in the area of lipids. Lipids are defined here in their broadest sense, to include: cholesterol, essential fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, phospholipids, inositol lipids, second messenger lipids, enzymes and synthetic machinery that is involved in the metabolism of various lipids in the cells and tissues, and also various aspects of lipid transport, etc. In addition, the journal also publishes research that investigates and defines the role of lipids in various physiological processes, pathology and disease. In particular, the journal aims to bridge the gap between the bench and the clinic by publishing articles that are particularly relevant to human diseases and the role of lipids in the management of various diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信