富血小板血浆制剂治疗骨关节炎的疗效:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Dongsheng Yu, Jiani Zhao, Kun Zhao
{"title":"富血小板血浆制剂治疗骨关节炎的疗效:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Dongsheng Yu, Jiani Zhao, Kun Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-06026-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread joint disease characterized by the gradual loss of cartilage. Intra-articular injections, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), are commonly used for treatment, but the optimal PRP preparation method remains debated. This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy of different PRP preparation methods and determine the most effective protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating intra-articular injectables in osteoarthritic knees were included. Data were extracted, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were analyzed at 3, 6, and 12-18 months. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist network meta-analysis, and treatment options were ranked using the P-Score. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.3.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three RCTs with 1752 patients were included. Treatments included PRP, plasma rich in growth factor (PRGF), leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and saline placebo. Leukocyte-rich PRP with low platelet concentration increase, using both anticoagulant and activator showed the best effects on WOMAC pain and stiffness scores within 6 months (WMD = 26.02; 95% CrI, 0.92-52.46). Leukocyte-poor PRP with high platelet concentration increase, using anticoagulant without activator was most effective for WOMAC function and stiffness at 12-18 months (WMD = 18.94; 95% CrI, 8.34-28.12). Long-term results indicated Leukocyte-poor PRP with low platelet concentration increase, using anticoagulant without activator yielded the best outcomes for cartilage repair and function (WMD = 17.09; 95% CrI, -8.4 to 42.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimizing OA treatment involves tailoring PRP protocols to disease stage, with low platelet, high leukocyte PRP (RPRP_LPC_Y_Y) recommended for early OA due to its anti-inflammatory effects and high platelet, low leukocyte PRP (PPRP-HPC) preferred for advanced OA to promote tissue repair and regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma preparation protocols in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Dongsheng Yu, Jiani Zhao, Kun Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-06026-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread joint disease characterized by the gradual loss of cartilage. Intra-articular injections, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), are commonly used for treatment, but the optimal PRP preparation method remains debated. This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy of different PRP preparation methods and determine the most effective protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating intra-articular injectables in osteoarthritic knees were included. Data were extracted, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were analyzed at 3, 6, and 12-18 months. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist network meta-analysis, and treatment options were ranked using the P-Score. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.3.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three RCTs with 1752 patients were included. Treatments included PRP, plasma rich in growth factor (PRGF), leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and saline placebo. Leukocyte-rich PRP with low platelet concentration increase, using both anticoagulant and activator showed the best effects on WOMAC pain and stiffness scores within 6 months (WMD = 26.02; 95% CrI, 0.92-52.46). Leukocyte-poor PRP with high platelet concentration increase, using anticoagulant without activator was most effective for WOMAC function and stiffness at 12-18 months (WMD = 18.94; 95% CrI, 8.34-28.12). Long-term results indicated Leukocyte-poor PRP with low platelet concentration increase, using anticoagulant without activator yielded the best outcomes for cartilage repair and function (WMD = 17.09; 95% CrI, -8.4 to 42.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimizing OA treatment involves tailoring PRP protocols to disease stage, with low platelet, high leukocyte PRP (RPRP_LPC_Y_Y) recommended for early OA due to its anti-inflammatory effects and high platelet, low leukocyte PRP (PPRP-HPC) preferred for advanced OA to promote tissue repair and regeneration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06026-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06026-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨关节炎(OA)是一种广泛存在的关节疾病,其特征是软骨逐渐丧失。关节内注射,包括富血小板血浆(PRP),通常用于治疗,但最佳的PRP制备方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在对随机对照试验进行网络荟萃分析,比较不同PRP制备方法的疗效,并确定最有效的方案。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行文献检索。随机对照试验(rct)评估关节内注射治疗骨关节炎膝关节。提取数据,分析西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分在3、6和12-18个月。临床结果采用频率网络荟萃分析进行比较,治疗方案采用P-Score进行排名。采用r4.3.2进行统计学分析。结果:纳入23项随机对照试验,共1752例患者。治疗包括PRP、血浆中富含生长因子(PRGF)、低白细胞PRP (LP-PRP)、高白细胞PRP (LR-PRP)、透明质酸(HA)和生理盐水安慰剂。在血小板浓度升高低的富白细胞PRP组,同时使用抗凝剂和激活剂对6个月内WOMAC疼痛和僵硬评分的影响最好(WMD = 26.02;95% CrI, 0.92-52.46)。白细胞贫乏的PRP伴血小板浓度增高,使用抗凝剂而不使用活化剂对12-18个月WOMAC功能和僵硬最有效(WMD = 18.94;95% CrI, 8.34-28.12)。长期结果显示,白细胞较差的PRP伴低血小板浓度升高,使用抗凝剂而不使用激活剂对软骨修复和功能的效果最好(WMD = 17.09;95% CrI, -8.4 ~ 42.78)。结论:优化OA治疗包括根据疾病分期定制PRP方案,早期OA推荐低血小板、高白细胞PRP (RPRP_LPC_Y_Y),因为其具有抗炎作用,晚期OA首选高血小板、低白细胞PRP (PPRP-HPC),以促进组织修复和再生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma preparation protocols in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread joint disease characterized by the gradual loss of cartilage. Intra-articular injections, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), are commonly used for treatment, but the optimal PRP preparation method remains debated. This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy of different PRP preparation methods and determine the most effective protocols.

Methods: The literature search was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating intra-articular injectables in osteoarthritic knees were included. Data were extracted, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were analyzed at 3, 6, and 12-18 months. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist network meta-analysis, and treatment options were ranked using the P-Score. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.3.2.

Results: Twenty-three RCTs with 1752 patients were included. Treatments included PRP, plasma rich in growth factor (PRGF), leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and saline placebo. Leukocyte-rich PRP with low platelet concentration increase, using both anticoagulant and activator showed the best effects on WOMAC pain and stiffness scores within 6 months (WMD = 26.02; 95% CrI, 0.92-52.46). Leukocyte-poor PRP with high platelet concentration increase, using anticoagulant without activator was most effective for WOMAC function and stiffness at 12-18 months (WMD = 18.94; 95% CrI, 8.34-28.12). Long-term results indicated Leukocyte-poor PRP with low platelet concentration increase, using anticoagulant without activator yielded the best outcomes for cartilage repair and function (WMD = 17.09; 95% CrI, -8.4 to 42.78).

Conclusions: Optimizing OA treatment involves tailoring PRP protocols to disease stage, with low platelet, high leukocyte PRP (RPRP_LPC_Y_Y) recommended for early OA due to its anti-inflammatory effects and high platelet, low leukocyte PRP (PPRP-HPC) preferred for advanced OA to promote tissue repair and regeneration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信