监督、绩效评估和认可战略——对尼泊尔加强药品管理的多管齐下干预措施的准实验性前后研究

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2512180
Reekesh Shrestha, Santusta Adhikari, Anup Bastola, Sushil Nepal, Tamara Hafner, Birna Trap
{"title":"监督、绩效评估和认可战略——对尼泊尔加强药品管理的多管齐下干预措施的准实验性前后研究","authors":"Reekesh Shrestha, Santusta Adhikari, Anup Bastola, Sushil Nepal, Tamara Hafner, Birna Trap","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2512180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To improve medicines management (MM) in health facilities, Nepal piloted a multipronged intervention - the supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy (SPARS). This paper describes a pre-post intervention to assess the SPARS intervention effect on improving MM in selected government health facilities at all levels of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Selected health workers were trained as MM supervisors (MMS) to visit health facilities, assess MM performance, and use the findings to provide support in MM practices. MMS assessed performance using an indicator-based tool containing 25 MM indicators covering five domains: dispensing quality, prescribing quality, stock management, storage management, and ordering and reporting, for a maximum score of 25. From mid-2022 to October 2023, 48 MMS visited 347 government health facilities in 12 randomly selected pilot districts in three provinces. We assessed SPARS indicator performance over 3 supervisory visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the first and third SPARS visit, we found a significant (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.000) improvement of 123% or a 41.4 percentage-point change in the overall SPARS indicator score from an average of 8.5-18.8. improvements were observed in all five domains. Further, MMS with less than 10 years of experience had a higher impact than more experienced MMS - 39.4 and 33.8 points, respectively. At baseline, no facility had adequate SPARS scores of ≥75%, while 184 facilities (53%) were adequate by the third visit. There was no significant difference in impact measured between provinces; remote and residential facilities; high, medium, and low-level care facilities; and resource-based and behavioural indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following three supervisory visits, the multipronged intervention significantly improved the overall SPARS score and all 25 indicators assessing performance in stock and storage, ordering and reporting, and dispensing and prescribing quality. We recommend SPARS as an effective approach to strengthen MM in health facilities in Nepal and other low-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2512180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy - a quasi-experimental pre-post study of the multipronged interventions to and strengthen medicines management in Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Reekesh Shrestha, Santusta Adhikari, Anup Bastola, Sushil Nepal, Tamara Hafner, Birna Trap\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2025.2512180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To improve medicines management (MM) in health facilities, Nepal piloted a multipronged intervention - the supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy (SPARS). This paper describes a pre-post intervention to assess the SPARS intervention effect on improving MM in selected government health facilities at all levels of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Selected health workers were trained as MM supervisors (MMS) to visit health facilities, assess MM performance, and use the findings to provide support in MM practices. MMS assessed performance using an indicator-based tool containing 25 MM indicators covering five domains: dispensing quality, prescribing quality, stock management, storage management, and ordering and reporting, for a maximum score of 25. From mid-2022 to October 2023, 48 MMS visited 347 government health facilities in 12 randomly selected pilot districts in three provinces. We assessed SPARS indicator performance over 3 supervisory visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the first and third SPARS visit, we found a significant (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.000) improvement of 123% or a 41.4 percentage-point change in the overall SPARS indicator score from an average of 8.5-18.8. improvements were observed in all five domains. Further, MMS with less than 10 years of experience had a higher impact than more experienced MMS - 39.4 and 33.8 points, respectively. At baseline, no facility had adequate SPARS scores of ≥75%, while 184 facilities (53%) were adequate by the third visit. There was no significant difference in impact measured between provinces; remote and residential facilities; high, medium, and low-level care facilities; and resource-based and behavioural indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following three supervisory visits, the multipronged intervention significantly improved the overall SPARS score and all 25 indicators assessing performance in stock and storage, ordering and reporting, and dispensing and prescribing quality. We recommend SPARS as an effective approach to strengthen MM in health facilities in Nepal and other low-income countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2512180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180342/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2512180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2512180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了改善卫生机构的药品管理,尼泊尔试行了一项多管齐下的干预措施——监督、绩效评估和识别战略(SPARS)。本文描述了一种前后干预,以评估SPARS干预对改善各级政府卫生机构MM的效果。方法:将选定的卫生工作者培训为MM监督员(MMS),以访问卫生机构,评估MM绩效,并利用调查结果为MM实践提供支持。MMS使用基于指标的工具评估绩效,该工具包含25个MM指标,涵盖五个领域:配药质量、处方质量、库存管理、存储管理以及订购和报告,最高得分为25分。从2022年年中到2023年10月,48名MMS在3个省随机选择的12个试点地区访问了347家政府卫生机构。我们在3次监督访问中评估了SPARS指标的表现。结果:在第一次和第三次SPARS就诊之间,我们发现SPARS总体指标得分从平均8.5-18.8分显著改善了123% (p≤0.000)或41.4个百分点的变化。在所有五个领域都观察到改善。此外,经验不足10年的MMS比经验丰富的MMS有更高的影响,分别为39.4分和33.8分。基线时,没有一家医院的SPARS评分≥75%,而第三次就诊时,184家医院(53%)达到了适足。省与省之间的影响没有显著差异;偏远和居住设施;高级、中级和低级护理设施;以及基于资源和行为的指标。结论:经过三次监督访问,多管齐下的干预措施显著提高了SPARS总体评分和库存与储存、订货与报告、调剂与处方质量等25项绩效评估指标。我们建议SPARS作为在尼泊尔和其他低收入国家的卫生设施中加强MM的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy - a quasi-experimental pre-post study of the multipronged interventions to and strengthen medicines management in Nepal.

Background: To improve medicines management (MM) in health facilities, Nepal piloted a multipronged intervention - the supervision, performance assessment, and recognition strategy (SPARS). This paper describes a pre-post intervention to assess the SPARS intervention effect on improving MM in selected government health facilities at all levels of care.

Methods: Selected health workers were trained as MM supervisors (MMS) to visit health facilities, assess MM performance, and use the findings to provide support in MM practices. MMS assessed performance using an indicator-based tool containing 25 MM indicators covering five domains: dispensing quality, prescribing quality, stock management, storage management, and ordering and reporting, for a maximum score of 25. From mid-2022 to October 2023, 48 MMS visited 347 government health facilities in 12 randomly selected pilot districts in three provinces. We assessed SPARS indicator performance over 3 supervisory visits.

Results: Between the first and third SPARS visit, we found a significant (p ≤ 0.000) improvement of 123% or a 41.4 percentage-point change in the overall SPARS indicator score from an average of 8.5-18.8. improvements were observed in all five domains. Further, MMS with less than 10 years of experience had a higher impact than more experienced MMS - 39.4 and 33.8 points, respectively. At baseline, no facility had adequate SPARS scores of ≥75%, while 184 facilities (53%) were adequate by the third visit. There was no significant difference in impact measured between provinces; remote and residential facilities; high, medium, and low-level care facilities; and resource-based and behavioural indicators.

Conclusion: Following three supervisory visits, the multipronged intervention significantly improved the overall SPARS score and all 25 indicators assessing performance in stock and storage, ordering and reporting, and dispensing and prescribing quality. We recommend SPARS as an effective approach to strengthen MM in health facilities in Nepal and other low-income countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信