Yujun He, Xiaoyi Wang, Minhui Liu, Lu Li, Tingfen Han, Yachao Wu, Xiaojun Li
{"title":"基于数据挖掘的针灸治疗偏头痛穴位应用规律及临床意义探讨","authors":"Yujun He, Xiaoyi Wang, Minhui Liu, Lu Li, Tingfen Han, Yachao Wu, Xiaojun Li","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S527987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abundant clinical investigations have attested to the efficacy of acupuncture in treating migraines. However, as each acupoint elicits distinct analgesic pathways and acupuncturists vary in their acupoint selection, there is currently an absence of evidence-based guidance for determining the optimal acupoint selection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct an initial comprehensive data mining analysis to identify the most effective acupoints and their combinations for migraine treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was carried out in eight electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Chongqing VIP Database) from their inception up to May 2025. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating migraines were selected. The literature was rigorously evaluated according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and relevant data were then extracted for analysis. Excel 2021 was used for descriptive statistical analysis. Association rule analysis was performed using SPSS Modeler 14.1. Exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and decision tree analysis were conducted using SPSS Statistics 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 911 trials were identified, from which 1610 groups of effective prescriptions involving 181 acupoints were extracted. The most commonly used acupoints were Feng-chi (GB20), Tai-yang (EX-HN5), Shuai-gu (GB8), Bai-hui (GV20), and He-gu (LI4). The gallbladder meridian was the most frequently utilized meridian. Specific points, mainly crossing points, were predominantly used, with head and neck acupoints being the most common. The combination of \"Feng-chi (GB20), Tai-yang (EX-HN5), and Shuai-gu (GB8)\" was frequently used as the core acupoints group. Additionally, several acupoint combinations were obtained through exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and decision tree analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research provides evidence-based support for the effectiveness of acupoint selection in migraine treatment and offers potential therapeutic recommendations, thereby facilitating collaborative decision-making between healthcare providers and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"3049-3067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the Application Rules and Clinical Significance of Acupoints in Acupuncture Treatment of Migraine Based on Data Mining.\",\"authors\":\"Yujun He, Xiaoyi Wang, Minhui Liu, Lu Li, Tingfen Han, Yachao Wu, Xiaojun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S527987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abundant clinical investigations have attested to the efficacy of acupuncture in treating migraines. However, as each acupoint elicits distinct analgesic pathways and acupuncturists vary in their acupoint selection, there is currently an absence of evidence-based guidance for determining the optimal acupoint selection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct an initial comprehensive data mining analysis to identify the most effective acupoints and their combinations for migraine treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was carried out in eight electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Chongqing VIP Database) from their inception up to May 2025. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating migraines were selected. The literature was rigorously evaluated according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and relevant data were then extracted for analysis. Excel 2021 was used for descriptive statistical analysis. Association rule analysis was performed using SPSS Modeler 14.1. Exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and decision tree analysis were conducted using SPSS Statistics 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 911 trials were identified, from which 1610 groups of effective prescriptions involving 181 acupoints were extracted. The most commonly used acupoints were Feng-chi (GB20), Tai-yang (EX-HN5), Shuai-gu (GB8), Bai-hui (GV20), and He-gu (LI4). The gallbladder meridian was the most frequently utilized meridian. Specific points, mainly crossing points, were predominantly used, with head and neck acupoints being the most common. The combination of \\\"Feng-chi (GB20), Tai-yang (EX-HN5), and Shuai-gu (GB8)\\\" was frequently used as the core acupoints group. Additionally, several acupoint combinations were obtained through exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and decision tree analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research provides evidence-based support for the effectiveness of acupoint selection in migraine treatment and offers potential therapeutic recommendations, thereby facilitating collaborative decision-making between healthcare providers and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3049-3067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S527987\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S527987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:大量的临床研究证实了针灸治疗偏头痛的疗效。然而,由于每个穴位都有不同的镇痛途径,针灸师的穴位选择也各不相同,目前还缺乏以证据为基础的指导来确定最佳的穴位选择。目的:本研究的目的是进行初步的综合数据挖掘分析,以确定偏头痛治疗最有效的穴位及其组合。方法:对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、重庆VIP数据库等8个电子书目数据库自建库至2025年5月进行全面检索。选取评价针刺治疗偏头痛疗效的研究。根据预先设定的纳入和排除标准对文献进行严格评估,然后提取相关数据进行分析。采用Excel 2021进行描述性统计分析。使用SPSS Modeler 14.1进行关联规则分析。采用SPSS 26.0进行探索性因子分析、聚类分析和决策树分析。结果:共鉴定出911个试验,从中提取出1610组有效方剂,涉及181个穴位。最常用的穴位为风池(GB20)、太阳(EX-HN5)、腰谷(GB8)、百会(GV20)、和谷(LI4)。胆囊经络是最常用的经络。具体穴位,以交叉穴位为主,以头颈部穴位最为常见。以“风池(GB20)、太极(EX-HN5)、腰鼓(GB8)”组合为核心穴组。此外,通过探索性因子分析、聚类分析和决策树分析,获得几种穴位组合。结论:本研究为穴位选择在偏头痛治疗中的有效性提供了循证支持,并提供了潜在的治疗建议,从而促进了医护人员和患者之间的协同决策。
Exploration of the Application Rules and Clinical Significance of Acupoints in Acupuncture Treatment of Migraine Based on Data Mining.
Background: Abundant clinical investigations have attested to the efficacy of acupuncture in treating migraines. However, as each acupoint elicits distinct analgesic pathways and acupuncturists vary in their acupoint selection, there is currently an absence of evidence-based guidance for determining the optimal acupoint selection.
Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct an initial comprehensive data mining analysis to identify the most effective acupoints and their combinations for migraine treatment.
Methods: A comprehensive search was carried out in eight electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Chongqing VIP Database) from their inception up to May 2025. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating migraines were selected. The literature was rigorously evaluated according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and relevant data were then extracted for analysis. Excel 2021 was used for descriptive statistical analysis. Association rule analysis was performed using SPSS Modeler 14.1. Exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and decision tree analysis were conducted using SPSS Statistics 26.0.
Results: A total of 911 trials were identified, from which 1610 groups of effective prescriptions involving 181 acupoints were extracted. The most commonly used acupoints were Feng-chi (GB20), Tai-yang (EX-HN5), Shuai-gu (GB8), Bai-hui (GV20), and He-gu (LI4). The gallbladder meridian was the most frequently utilized meridian. Specific points, mainly crossing points, were predominantly used, with head and neck acupoints being the most common. The combination of "Feng-chi (GB20), Tai-yang (EX-HN5), and Shuai-gu (GB8)" was frequently used as the core acupoints group. Additionally, several acupoint combinations were obtained through exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and decision tree analysis.
Conclusion: This research provides evidence-based support for the effectiveness of acupoint selection in migraine treatment and offers potential therapeutic recommendations, thereby facilitating collaborative decision-making between healthcare providers and patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.