{"title":"膝神经阻滞治疗原发性和继发性膝关节骨关节炎疼痛和功能的疗效和时间动态:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ziqing Li, Yang Bai, Cheng Liu, Yanglin Gu","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S518315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a promising intervention for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), yet its comparative efficacy remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of GNB in reducing pain and improving function for primary or secondary KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 9, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing GNB with other therapies. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4, and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included six RCTs involving a total of 420 participants. Results revealed that GNB significantly reduced pain (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.48-1.52, p=0.0002) and improved function (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.37-1.77, p=0.003) compared to other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that GNB provided better pain relief at 2 weeks (SMD=1.21; 95% CI: 0.09-2.33; P=0.03) and greater functional improvement at 12 weeks (SMD=1.13; 95% CI: 0.10-2.16; P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review suggested GNB as an effective intervention for KOA management, with distinct temporal patterns for pain relief and functional improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"3037-3048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Temporal Dynamics of Genicular Nerve Block in Primary and Secondary Knee Osteoarthritis for Pain and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ziqing Li, Yang Bai, Cheng Liu, Yanglin Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S518315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a promising intervention for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), yet its comparative efficacy remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of GNB in reducing pain and improving function for primary or secondary KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 9, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing GNB with other therapies. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4, and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included six RCTs involving a total of 420 participants. Results revealed that GNB significantly reduced pain (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.48-1.52, p=0.0002) and improved function (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.37-1.77, p=0.003) compared to other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that GNB provided better pain relief at 2 weeks (SMD=1.21; 95% CI: 0.09-2.33; P=0.03) and greater functional improvement at 12 weeks (SMD=1.13; 95% CI: 0.10-2.16; P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review suggested GNB as an effective intervention for KOA management, with distinct temporal patterns for pain relief and functional improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3037-3048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S518315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S518315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Temporal Dynamics of Genicular Nerve Block in Primary and Secondary Knee Osteoarthritis for Pain and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Purpose: Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a promising intervention for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), yet its comparative efficacy remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of GNB in reducing pain and improving function for primary or secondary KOA.
Methods: We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 9, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing GNB with other therapies. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4, and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Results: This study included six RCTs involving a total of 420 participants. Results revealed that GNB significantly reduced pain (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.48-1.52, p=0.0002) and improved function (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.37-1.77, p=0.003) compared to other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that GNB provided better pain relief at 2 weeks (SMD=1.21; 95% CI: 0.09-2.33; P=0.03) and greater functional improvement at 12 weeks (SMD=1.13; 95% CI: 0.10-2.16; P=0.03).
Conclusion: This review suggested GNB as an effective intervention for KOA management, with distinct temporal patterns for pain relief and functional improvement.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.