慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺部康复的新型电子健康工具评估:随机对照试验和可行性试验

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Åsa Karlsson, Pernilla Sönnerfors, Sara Lundell, Annika Toots, Karin Wadell
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺部康复的新型电子健康工具评估:随机对照试验和可行性试验","authors":"Åsa Karlsson, Pernilla Sönnerfors, Sara Lundell, Annika Toots, Karin Wadell","doi":"10.2196/68195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing interest in eHealth solutions to enhance access to and use of pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a novel eHealth tool (Me&COPD) to support pulmonary rehabilitation concerning usability, exercise adherence, intensity, progression, and adverse events. Moreover, this study aims to evaluate clinical outcome measures to prepare for a future larger trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled pilot and feasibility trial was conducted in 6 primary health care centers. People with mild to severe COPD were recruited by physiotherapists at the included health care centers and randomized either to the intervention group with access to Me&COPD for 3 months or to the control group receiving usual care. The Me&COPD tool comprised audio-visual and written self-management strategies, including an individually tailored home-based exercise program and interaction with a physiotherapist. The exercise program was prescribed in a face-to-face meeting with a physiotherapist, and thereafter it was regularly reviewed and adjusted through the eHealth tool. The primary outcome, usability, was self-assessed at intervention completion in the intervention group and among participating physiotherapists (n=7) using the Swedish version of the Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire (S-MAUQ). In addition, use data on exercise adherence, intensity, and progression and adverse events were exported from the eHealth tool. Clinical outcomes, assessed by blinded assessors at baseline and 3 months in the intervention and control groups, included exercise capacity, balance, physical activity level, COPD-related symptoms, and health-related quality of life. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 22 participants (women: n=12, 55%), aged 72.3 (SD 8.4) years on average, were included in the intervention (n=15) and control (n=7) groups. The mean overall S-MAUQ scores out of 7 (highest possible usability) were 4.4 (SD 1.5) for participants and 4.5 (SD 1.2) for physiotherapists. Among the subscales, the highest score was assigned to usefulness among participants (S-MAUQ: mean 4.9, SD 1.3) and physiotherapists (S-MAUQ: mean 5.1, SD 1.7). No severe adverse events were registered, although exercise adherence, intensity, and progression evaluation were limited by incomplete exercise session registration. The test procedures and the clinical outcome measures used were found to be feasible for the participants and the assessors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel eHealth tool, Me&COPD, seemed feasible in terms of safety and had acceptable usability among people with COPD and participating physiotherapists. Usability may be improved by better organization of the information and simplification of the exercise diary to enable collection of data on exercise adherence, intensity, and progression through the eHealth tool. The test procedures seemed feasible, although the recruitment process needs further consideration. The effectiveness of the intervention remains to be evaluated in a future larger trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05086341; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05086341.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e68195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Novel eHealth Tool for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Pilot and Feasibility Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Åsa Karlsson, Pernilla Sönnerfors, Sara Lundell, Annika Toots, Karin Wadell\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/68195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing interest in eHealth solutions to enhance access to and use of pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a novel eHealth tool (Me&COPD) to support pulmonary rehabilitation concerning usability, exercise adherence, intensity, progression, and adverse events. Moreover, this study aims to evaluate clinical outcome measures to prepare for a future larger trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled pilot and feasibility trial was conducted in 6 primary health care centers. People with mild to severe COPD were recruited by physiotherapists at the included health care centers and randomized either to the intervention group with access to Me&COPD for 3 months or to the control group receiving usual care. The Me&COPD tool comprised audio-visual and written self-management strategies, including an individually tailored home-based exercise program and interaction with a physiotherapist. The exercise program was prescribed in a face-to-face meeting with a physiotherapist, and thereafter it was regularly reviewed and adjusted through the eHealth tool. The primary outcome, usability, was self-assessed at intervention completion in the intervention group and among participating physiotherapists (n=7) using the Swedish version of the Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire (S-MAUQ). In addition, use data on exercise adherence, intensity, and progression and adverse events were exported from the eHealth tool. Clinical outcomes, assessed by blinded assessors at baseline and 3 months in the intervention and control groups, included exercise capacity, balance, physical activity level, COPD-related symptoms, and health-related quality of life. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 22 participants (women: n=12, 55%), aged 72.3 (SD 8.4) years on average, were included in the intervention (n=15) and control (n=7) groups. The mean overall S-MAUQ scores out of 7 (highest possible usability) were 4.4 (SD 1.5) for participants and 4.5 (SD 1.2) for physiotherapists. Among the subscales, the highest score was assigned to usefulness among participants (S-MAUQ: mean 4.9, SD 1.3) and physiotherapists (S-MAUQ: mean 5.1, SD 1.7). No severe adverse events were registered, although exercise adherence, intensity, and progression evaluation were limited by incomplete exercise session registration. The test procedures and the clinical outcome measures used were found to be feasible for the participants and the assessors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel eHealth tool, Me&COPD, seemed feasible in terms of safety and had acceptable usability among people with COPD and participating physiotherapists. Usability may be improved by better organization of the information and simplification of the exercise diary to enable collection of data on exercise adherence, intensity, and progression through the eHealth tool. The test procedures seemed feasible, although the recruitment process needs further consideration. The effectiveness of the intervention remains to be evaluated in a future larger trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05086341; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05086341.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e68195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/68195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们对电子健康解决方案越来越感兴趣,以提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者获得和使用肺部康复的机会。目的:本研究旨在评估一种新型电子健康工具(Me&COPD)在易用性、运动依从性、强度、进展和不良事件方面支持肺部康复的可行性。此外,本研究旨在评估临床结果措施,为未来更大规模的试验做准备。方法:在6个初级卫生保健中心进行多中心、平行组随机对照试验和可行性试验。在纳入的卫生保健中心,物理治疗师招募了轻度至重度COPD患者,并随机分为干预组和对照组,实验组接受Me&COPD治疗3个月,对照组接受常规治疗。Me&COPD工具包括视听和书面自我管理策略,包括个人定制的家庭锻炼计划和与物理治疗师的互动。锻炼计划是在与物理治疗师面对面的会议上制定的,之后通过电子健康工具定期审查和调整。主要结果,可用性,在干预组和参与的物理治疗师(n=7)中使用瑞典版移动健康应用程序可用性问卷(S-MAUQ)在干预完成时进行自我评估。此外,从eHealth工具导出了关于运动坚持、强度、进展和不良事件的使用数据。干预组和对照组的临床结果在基线和3个月时由盲法评估,包括运动能力、平衡、身体活动水平、copd相关症状和与健康相关的生活质量。采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:干预组(n=15)和对照组(n=7)共纳入22名参与者(女性:n=12, 55%),平均年龄72.3岁(SD = 8.4)。参与者的平均总体S-MAUQ得分为4.4 (SD 1.5)(最高可用性),物理治疗师的平均总体S-MAUQ得分为4.5 (SD 1.2)。在子量表中,得分最高的是参与者(S-MAUQ:平均4.9,SD 1.3)和物理治疗师(S-MAUQ:平均5.1,SD 1.7)的有用性。没有记录到严重的不良事件,尽管运动依从性、强度和进展评估受到不完整运动课程登记的限制。所采用的测试程序和临床结果测量方法对参与者和评估者都是可行的。结论:新型电子健康工具Me&COPD在安全性方面似乎是可行的,并且在COPD患者和参与的物理治疗师中具有可接受的可用性。通过更好地组织信息和简化运动日记,可以通过电子健康工具收集关于运动坚持、强度和进展的数据,从而提高可用性。测试程序似乎是可行的,尽管征聘程序需要进一步考虑。干预措施的有效性仍有待在未来更大规模的试验中评估。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05086341;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05086341。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a Novel eHealth Tool for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Pilot and Feasibility Trial.

Background: There is a growing interest in eHealth solutions to enhance access to and use of pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a novel eHealth tool (Me&COPD) to support pulmonary rehabilitation concerning usability, exercise adherence, intensity, progression, and adverse events. Moreover, this study aims to evaluate clinical outcome measures to prepare for a future larger trial.

Methods: A multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled pilot and feasibility trial was conducted in 6 primary health care centers. People with mild to severe COPD were recruited by physiotherapists at the included health care centers and randomized either to the intervention group with access to Me&COPD for 3 months or to the control group receiving usual care. The Me&COPD tool comprised audio-visual and written self-management strategies, including an individually tailored home-based exercise program and interaction with a physiotherapist. The exercise program was prescribed in a face-to-face meeting with a physiotherapist, and thereafter it was regularly reviewed and adjusted through the eHealth tool. The primary outcome, usability, was self-assessed at intervention completion in the intervention group and among participating physiotherapists (n=7) using the Swedish version of the Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire (S-MAUQ). In addition, use data on exercise adherence, intensity, and progression and adverse events were exported from the eHealth tool. Clinical outcomes, assessed by blinded assessors at baseline and 3 months in the intervention and control groups, included exercise capacity, balance, physical activity level, COPD-related symptoms, and health-related quality of life. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results: In total, 22 participants (women: n=12, 55%), aged 72.3 (SD 8.4) years on average, were included in the intervention (n=15) and control (n=7) groups. The mean overall S-MAUQ scores out of 7 (highest possible usability) were 4.4 (SD 1.5) for participants and 4.5 (SD 1.2) for physiotherapists. Among the subscales, the highest score was assigned to usefulness among participants (S-MAUQ: mean 4.9, SD 1.3) and physiotherapists (S-MAUQ: mean 5.1, SD 1.7). No severe adverse events were registered, although exercise adherence, intensity, and progression evaluation were limited by incomplete exercise session registration. The test procedures and the clinical outcome measures used were found to be feasible for the participants and the assessors.

Conclusions: The novel eHealth tool, Me&COPD, seemed feasible in terms of safety and had acceptable usability among people with COPD and participating physiotherapists. Usability may be improved by better organization of the information and simplification of the exercise diary to enable collection of data on exercise adherence, intensity, and progression through the eHealth tool. The test procedures seemed feasible, although the recruitment process needs further consideration. The effectiveness of the intervention remains to be evaluated in a future larger trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05086341; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05086341.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信