低剂量PD-1单克隆抗体单独或联合作为晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的有效性和安全性的现实研究。

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Jingqi Sun, Junli Hao, Xin Li, Lu Xu, Tao Han, Sha Shi, Heming Li, Mingfang Zhao
{"title":"低剂量PD-1单克隆抗体单独或联合作为晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的有效性和安全性的现实研究。","authors":"Jingqi Sun, Junli Hao, Xin Li, Lu Xu, Tao Han, Sha Shi, Heming Li, Mingfang Zhao","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2025-011622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often receive low-dose programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies due to physical or financial limitations. However, the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared with standard-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibodies remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 400 patients with locally advanced or advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors as initial systemic therapy, either as monotherapy or combination therapy. Patients were classified into standard-dose (n=216), mid-treatment dose reduction (n=26), and low-dose (n=158) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM) in the combination therapy cohort. Non-inferiority of low-dose therapy for PFS (margin=1.3) and OS (margin=1.33) was based on clinical rationale and previous studies..</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 patients (8%) underwent surgery following systemic therapy. Among patients receiving first-line monotherapy (n=25), mPFS was 34.6 months for low-dose (L), 59.8 months for standard-dose (S), and 17.4 months for mid-treatment dose reduction (M), with no significant differences (HR (L vs S) = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.17 to 3.83; HR (M vs S) = 3.91, 95% CI: 0.45 to 34.14; p=0.37). In first-line combination therapy, before PSM, the mPFS was 16.8 vs 12.1 months and mOS was 35.7 vs 42.6 months (L vs S). After PSM, outcomes remained comparable (mPFS: 18.2 vs 11.2 months, p=0.22; mOS: 35.7 vs 28.7 months, p=0.47). Importantly, in the first-line combination therapy cohort, the incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs was significantly lower in the low-dose group (9.7% vs 17.9%, p=0.030). PFS met the non-inferiority criterion after PSM, whereas OS did not, likely due to an insufficient number of events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy to standard-dose therapy with a lower incidence of severe irAEs in combination regimens. These findings suggest a cost-effective and safe alternative, warranting validation in future randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A real-world study on the efficacy and safety of low-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibody alone or in combination as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jingqi Sun, Junli Hao, Xin Li, Lu Xu, Tao Han, Sha Shi, Heming Li, Mingfang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2025-011622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often receive low-dose programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies due to physical or financial limitations. However, the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared with standard-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibodies remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 400 patients with locally advanced or advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors as initial systemic therapy, either as monotherapy or combination therapy. Patients were classified into standard-dose (n=216), mid-treatment dose reduction (n=26), and low-dose (n=158) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM) in the combination therapy cohort. Non-inferiority of low-dose therapy for PFS (margin=1.3) and OS (margin=1.33) was based on clinical rationale and previous studies..</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 patients (8%) underwent surgery following systemic therapy. Among patients receiving first-line monotherapy (n=25), mPFS was 34.6 months for low-dose (L), 59.8 months for standard-dose (S), and 17.4 months for mid-treatment dose reduction (M), with no significant differences (HR (L vs S) = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.17 to 3.83; HR (M vs S) = 3.91, 95% CI: 0.45 to 34.14; p=0.37). In first-line combination therapy, before PSM, the mPFS was 16.8 vs 12.1 months and mOS was 35.7 vs 42.6 months (L vs S). After PSM, outcomes remained comparable (mPFS: 18.2 vs 11.2 months, p=0.22; mOS: 35.7 vs 28.7 months, p=0.47). Importantly, in the first-line combination therapy cohort, the incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs was significantly lower in the low-dose group (9.7% vs 17.9%, p=0.030). PFS met the non-inferiority criterion after PSM, whereas OS did not, likely due to an insufficient number of events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy to standard-dose therapy with a lower incidence of severe irAEs in combination regimens. These findings suggest a cost-effective and safe alternative, warranting validation in future randomized controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184348/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-011622\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-011622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床实践中,由于身体或经济限制,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者经常接受低剂量程序性死亡-1 (PD-1)单克隆抗体。然而,与标准剂量PD-1单克隆抗体相比,低剂量PD-1单克隆抗体的有效性和安全性仍有待进一步研究。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了400例局部晚期或晚期NSCLC患者,采用PD-1抑制剂作为初始全身治疗,无论是单药治疗还是联合治疗。将患者分为标准剂量组(n=216)、治疗中期减剂量组(n=26)和低剂量组(n=158)。评估无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。在联合治疗队列中使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡基线特征。低剂量治疗对PFS(裕度=1.3)和OS(裕度=1.33)的非效性是基于临床理论和以往的研究。结果:32例(8%)患者在接受全身治疗后接受了手术。在接受一线单药治疗的患者(n=25)中,低剂量组(L)的mPFS为34.6个月,标准剂量组(S)的mPFS为59.8个月,中期减剂量组(M)的mPFS为17.4个月,差异无统计学意义(HR (L vs S) = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.17 ~ 3.83;HR (M vs S) = 3.91, 95% CI: 0.45 ~ 34.14;p = 0.37)。在一线联合治疗中,PSM前,mPFS为16.8个月vs 12.1个月,mOS为35.7个月vs 42.6个月(L vs S)。PSM后,结果保持可比性(mPFS: 18.2 vs 11.2个月,p=0.22;生存期:35.7个月vs 28.7个月,p=0.47)。重要的是,在一线联合治疗队列中,低剂量组≥3级irAEs的发生率显著降低(9.7% vs 17.9%, p=0.030)。PFS符合PSM后的非劣效性标准,而OS则没有,可能是由于事件数量不足。结论:在联合治疗方案中,低剂量PD-1单克隆抗体治疗的疗效与标准剂量治疗相当,且严重irAEs的发生率较低。这些发现提示了一种具有成本效益且安全的替代方法,值得在未来的随机对照试验中验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A real-world study on the efficacy and safety of low-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibody alone or in combination as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: In clinical practice, patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often receive low-dose programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies due to physical or financial limitations. However, the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared with standard-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibodies remain underexplored.

Methods: This retrospective study included 400 patients with locally advanced or advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors as initial systemic therapy, either as monotherapy or combination therapy. Patients were classified into standard-dose (n=216), mid-treatment dose reduction (n=26), and low-dose (n=158) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM) in the combination therapy cohort. Non-inferiority of low-dose therapy for PFS (margin=1.3) and OS (margin=1.33) was based on clinical rationale and previous studies..

Results: 32 patients (8%) underwent surgery following systemic therapy. Among patients receiving first-line monotherapy (n=25), mPFS was 34.6 months for low-dose (L), 59.8 months for standard-dose (S), and 17.4 months for mid-treatment dose reduction (M), with no significant differences (HR (L vs S) = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.17 to 3.83; HR (M vs S) = 3.91, 95% CI: 0.45 to 34.14; p=0.37). In first-line combination therapy, before PSM, the mPFS was 16.8 vs 12.1 months and mOS was 35.7 vs 42.6 months (L vs S). After PSM, outcomes remained comparable (mPFS: 18.2 vs 11.2 months, p=0.22; mOS: 35.7 vs 28.7 months, p=0.47). Importantly, in the first-line combination therapy cohort, the incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs was significantly lower in the low-dose group (9.7% vs 17.9%, p=0.030). PFS met the non-inferiority criterion after PSM, whereas OS did not, likely due to an insufficient number of events.

Conclusions: Low-dose PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy to standard-dose therapy with a lower incidence of severe irAEs in combination regimens. These findings suggest a cost-effective and safe alternative, warranting validation in future randomized controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.60%
发文量
522
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信