氟哌啶醇预防和治疗住院患者谵妄的有效性和安全性:系统综述综述

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Vijaykumar Harbishettar, Vijayakumar Heggeri, Saraswathi Tenagi, Aparna S Harbishettar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Sivakumar Pt, Geetha Desai, Muralidharan Kesavan
{"title":"氟哌啶醇预防和治疗住院患者谵妄的有效性和安全性:系统综述综述","authors":"Vijaykumar Harbishettar, Vijayakumar Heggeri, Saraswathi Tenagi, Aparna S Harbishettar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Sivakumar Pt, Geetha Desai, Muralidharan Kesavan","doi":"10.1177/02537176251345129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Delirium occurs in up to 31% of general hospital patients in the medical, surgical, or critical care wards. Agitation is common during hyperactive delirium, which poses a risk to themselves, other patients, or staff. Evidence for using oral or parenteral haloperidol from randomized controlled trials and published systematic reviews shows divergent findings, ranging from good response to no difference compared to placebo, despite its popularity in routine clinical use. We decided to perform an umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of haloperidol in delirium.</p><p><strong>Collection and analysis of data: </strong>This protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42024502020. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsychINFO for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in English only over the previous 20 years. These were searched under title, abstract, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms as applicable. We used Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 to assess the quality of the articles. Ten systematic reviews were finally selected for review that focused on either preventing or treating delirium. The summary of results did not find that haloperidol is effective in preventing or treating delirium, though all included reviews found it a safe drug to use. Heterogeneity from <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics varied from a moderate to a high degree and may be attributable to population, outcomes, and setting variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors conclude that there is limited evidence for haloperidol in preventing or treating delirium. Future studies must not aim to assess the resolution of delirium; instead, they must modify outcome measures, to mainly behavioral and psychiatric symptoms such as agitation, hallucinations, and persecutory delusions in delirium.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176251345129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Haloperidol in the Prevention and Management of Delirium in Medical Inpatients: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Vijaykumar Harbishettar, Vijayakumar Heggeri, Saraswathi Tenagi, Aparna S Harbishettar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Sivakumar Pt, Geetha Desai, Muralidharan Kesavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02537176251345129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Delirium occurs in up to 31% of general hospital patients in the medical, surgical, or critical care wards. Agitation is common during hyperactive delirium, which poses a risk to themselves, other patients, or staff. Evidence for using oral or parenteral haloperidol from randomized controlled trials and published systematic reviews shows divergent findings, ranging from good response to no difference compared to placebo, despite its popularity in routine clinical use. We decided to perform an umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of haloperidol in delirium.</p><p><strong>Collection and analysis of data: </strong>This protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42024502020. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsychINFO for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in English only over the previous 20 years. These were searched under title, abstract, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms as applicable. We used Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 to assess the quality of the articles. Ten systematic reviews were finally selected for review that focused on either preventing or treating delirium. The summary of results did not find that haloperidol is effective in preventing or treating delirium, though all included reviews found it a safe drug to use. Heterogeneity from <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics varied from a moderate to a high degree and may be attributable to population, outcomes, and setting variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors conclude that there is limited evidence for haloperidol in preventing or treating delirium. Future studies must not aim to assess the resolution of delirium; instead, they must modify outcome measures, to mainly behavioral and psychiatric symptoms such as agitation, hallucinations, and persecutory delusions in delirium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"02537176251345129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251345129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251345129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:谵妄在内科、外科或重症监护病房的综合医院患者中发生率高达31%。躁动在多动性谵妄中很常见,这对自己、其他病人或工作人员都有风险。来自随机对照试验和已发表的系统评价的口服或肠外氟哌啶醇的证据显示出不同的结果,从良好的反应到与安慰剂相比没有差异,尽管它在常规临床应用中很受欢迎。我们决定对氟哌啶醇治疗谵妄的有效性和安全性进行系统综述。数据收集和分析:本协议注册号为PROSPERO CRD42024502020。我们检索了PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE和PsychINFO,检索了过去20年仅用英语发表的meta分析的系统综述。这些是在标题、摘要和医学主题标题(MeSH)条件下搜索的。我们使用评估系统评价的方法学质量2来评估文章的质量。最后选择10篇系统综述进行综述,重点是预防或治疗谵妄。结果总结没有发现氟哌啶醇在预防或治疗谵妄方面是有效的,尽管所有包括的评论都发现它是一种安全的药物。i2统计数据的异质性从中等到高度不等,可能归因于人群、结局和环境变化。结论:作者认为氟哌啶醇用于预防或治疗谵妄的证据有限。未来的研究不能以评估谵妄的消退为目的;相反,他们必须修改结果测量,主要是行为和精神症状,如躁动、幻觉和谵妄中的迫害妄想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Haloperidol in the Prevention and Management of Delirium in Medical Inpatients: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Objective: Delirium occurs in up to 31% of general hospital patients in the medical, surgical, or critical care wards. Agitation is common during hyperactive delirium, which poses a risk to themselves, other patients, or staff. Evidence for using oral or parenteral haloperidol from randomized controlled trials and published systematic reviews shows divergent findings, ranging from good response to no difference compared to placebo, despite its popularity in routine clinical use. We decided to perform an umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of haloperidol in delirium.

Collection and analysis of data: This protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42024502020. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsychINFO for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in English only over the previous 20 years. These were searched under title, abstract, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms as applicable. We used Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 to assess the quality of the articles. Ten systematic reviews were finally selected for review that focused on either preventing or treating delirium. The summary of results did not find that haloperidol is effective in preventing or treating delirium, though all included reviews found it a safe drug to use. Heterogeneity from I 2 statistics varied from a moderate to a high degree and may be attributable to population, outcomes, and setting variations.

Conclusions: The authors conclude that there is limited evidence for haloperidol in preventing or treating delirium. Future studies must not aim to assess the resolution of delirium; instead, they must modify outcome measures, to mainly behavioral and psychiatric symptoms such as agitation, hallucinations, and persecutory delusions in delirium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信