{"title":"氟哌啶醇预防和治疗住院患者谵妄的有效性和安全性:系统综述综述","authors":"Vijaykumar Harbishettar, Vijayakumar Heggeri, Saraswathi Tenagi, Aparna S Harbishettar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Sivakumar Pt, Geetha Desai, Muralidharan Kesavan","doi":"10.1177/02537176251345129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Delirium occurs in up to 31% of general hospital patients in the medical, surgical, or critical care wards. Agitation is common during hyperactive delirium, which poses a risk to themselves, other patients, or staff. Evidence for using oral or parenteral haloperidol from randomized controlled trials and published systematic reviews shows divergent findings, ranging from good response to no difference compared to placebo, despite its popularity in routine clinical use. We decided to perform an umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of haloperidol in delirium.</p><p><strong>Collection and analysis of data: </strong>This protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42024502020. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsychINFO for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in English only over the previous 20 years. These were searched under title, abstract, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms as applicable. We used Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 to assess the quality of the articles. Ten systematic reviews were finally selected for review that focused on either preventing or treating delirium. The summary of results did not find that haloperidol is effective in preventing or treating delirium, though all included reviews found it a safe drug to use. Heterogeneity from <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics varied from a moderate to a high degree and may be attributable to population, outcomes, and setting variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors conclude that there is limited evidence for haloperidol in preventing or treating delirium. Future studies must not aim to assess the resolution of delirium; instead, they must modify outcome measures, to mainly behavioral and psychiatric symptoms such as agitation, hallucinations, and persecutory delusions in delirium.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176251345129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Haloperidol in the Prevention and Management of Delirium in Medical Inpatients: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Vijaykumar Harbishettar, Vijayakumar Heggeri, Saraswathi Tenagi, Aparna S Harbishettar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Sivakumar Pt, Geetha Desai, Muralidharan Kesavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02537176251345129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Delirium occurs in up to 31% of general hospital patients in the medical, surgical, or critical care wards. Agitation is common during hyperactive delirium, which poses a risk to themselves, other patients, or staff. Evidence for using oral or parenteral haloperidol from randomized controlled trials and published systematic reviews shows divergent findings, ranging from good response to no difference compared to placebo, despite its popularity in routine clinical use. We decided to perform an umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of haloperidol in delirium.</p><p><strong>Collection and analysis of data: </strong>This protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42024502020. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsychINFO for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in English only over the previous 20 years. These were searched under title, abstract, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms as applicable. We used Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 to assess the quality of the articles. Ten systematic reviews were finally selected for review that focused on either preventing or treating delirium. The summary of results did not find that haloperidol is effective in preventing or treating delirium, though all included reviews found it a safe drug to use. Heterogeneity from <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics varied from a moderate to a high degree and may be attributable to population, outcomes, and setting variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors conclude that there is limited evidence for haloperidol in preventing or treating delirium. Future studies must not aim to assess the resolution of delirium; instead, they must modify outcome measures, to mainly behavioral and psychiatric symptoms such as agitation, hallucinations, and persecutory delusions in delirium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"02537176251345129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251345129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251345129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Safety of Haloperidol in the Prevention and Management of Delirium in Medical Inpatients: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.
Objective: Delirium occurs in up to 31% of general hospital patients in the medical, surgical, or critical care wards. Agitation is common during hyperactive delirium, which poses a risk to themselves, other patients, or staff. Evidence for using oral or parenteral haloperidol from randomized controlled trials and published systematic reviews shows divergent findings, ranging from good response to no difference compared to placebo, despite its popularity in routine clinical use. We decided to perform an umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of haloperidol in delirium.
Collection and analysis of data: This protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42024502020. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsychINFO for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in English only over the previous 20 years. These were searched under title, abstract, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms as applicable. We used Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 to assess the quality of the articles. Ten systematic reviews were finally selected for review that focused on either preventing or treating delirium. The summary of results did not find that haloperidol is effective in preventing or treating delirium, though all included reviews found it a safe drug to use. Heterogeneity from I2 statistics varied from a moderate to a high degree and may be attributable to population, outcomes, and setting variations.
Conclusions: The authors conclude that there is limited evidence for haloperidol in preventing or treating delirium. Future studies must not aim to assess the resolution of delirium; instead, they must modify outcome measures, to mainly behavioral and psychiatric symptoms such as agitation, hallucinations, and persecutory delusions in delirium.
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.