分娩镇痛过程中间歇硬膜外注射与硬膜穿刺硬膜外阻滞的不同输注速度比较:一项随机对照研究。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002214
Yilu Zhou, Ruijing Ma, Jian Tang, Yujie Song, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhendong Xu
{"title":"分娩镇痛过程中间歇硬膜外注射与硬膜穿刺硬膜外阻滞的不同输注速度比较:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Yilu Zhou, Ruijing Ma, Jian Tang, Yujie Song, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhendong Xu","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dural puncture epidural block (DPE) with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) delivery provides effective analgesia for labour pain; however, it poses a risk of a high level of block.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect different pump speeds for a PIEB on maternal sensory block after DPE.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital, China, from June 2023 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Labour analgesia was administered to 120 nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy during the first stage of labour.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>After DPE insertion, women using labour analgesia were randomly allocated into a low-speed group (120 ml h -1 ), a medium-speed group (240 ml h -1 ) or a high-speed group (360 ml h -1 ). Epidural catheters were placed at L3/4 or L4/5, and epidural analgesia was maintained with a PIEB; 10 ml every 60 min using 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 μg ml -1 sufentanil.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The primary outcome was the highest level of upper sensory block from administering DPE combined with PIEB until delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 parturients were approached and 120 were randomised to three groups of 40. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups at any time in either the highest sensory block ( P  = 0.14) or the upper sensory block ( P  = 0.27). Lower sensory ( P  = 0.20) and sacral blocks ( P  = 0.84) did not differ between groups. Nevertheless, the highest visual analogue pain scores (> 3) after labour anaesthesia was statistically different between the three groups ( P  = 0.023). Satisfaction with labour analgesia was significantly different between groups ( P  = 0.006). No differences in other secondary outcomes were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DPE with PIEB delivery of 360 ml h -1 did not produce higher sensory block levels than either 240 ml h -1 or 120 ml h -1 . However, in secondary outcomes, the high speed delivery did provide more effective labour analgesia and higher satisfaction than low speed delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"783-790"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different bolus delivery speeds of a programmed intermittent epidural bolus combined with dural puncture epidural block during labour analgesia: A randomised controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Yilu Zhou, Ruijing Ma, Jian Tang, Yujie Song, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhendong Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dural puncture epidural block (DPE) with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) delivery provides effective analgesia for labour pain; however, it poses a risk of a high level of block.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect different pump speeds for a PIEB on maternal sensory block after DPE.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital, China, from June 2023 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Labour analgesia was administered to 120 nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy during the first stage of labour.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>After DPE insertion, women using labour analgesia were randomly allocated into a low-speed group (120 ml h -1 ), a medium-speed group (240 ml h -1 ) or a high-speed group (360 ml h -1 ). Epidural catheters were placed at L3/4 or L4/5, and epidural analgesia was maintained with a PIEB; 10 ml every 60 min using 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 μg ml -1 sufentanil.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The primary outcome was the highest level of upper sensory block from administering DPE combined with PIEB until delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 parturients were approached and 120 were randomised to three groups of 40. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups at any time in either the highest sensory block ( P  = 0.14) or the upper sensory block ( P  = 0.27). Lower sensory ( P  = 0.20) and sacral blocks ( P  = 0.84) did not differ between groups. Nevertheless, the highest visual analogue pain scores (> 3) after labour anaesthesia was statistically different between the three groups ( P  = 0.023). Satisfaction with labour analgesia was significantly different between groups ( P  = 0.006). No differences in other secondary outcomes were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DPE with PIEB delivery of 360 ml h -1 did not produce higher sensory block levels than either 240 ml h -1 or 120 ml h -1 . However, in secondary outcomes, the high speed delivery did provide more effective labour analgesia and higher satisfaction than low speed delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"783-790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:硬脑膜穿刺硬膜外阻滞(DPE)与计划性间歇硬脑膜外灌注(PIEB)提供有效的分娩镇痛;然而,它带来了高度阻塞的风险。目的:探讨pib不同泵速对产妇DPE后感觉阻滞的影响。设计:前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。地点:中国某妇产科医院,2023年6月至2023年12月。参与者:在分娩第一阶段对120名未生育的单胎妊娠妇女进行分娩镇痛。干预:插入DPE后,使用分娩镇痛的妇女随机分为低速组(120 ml h-1)、中速组(240 ml h-1)或高速组(360 ml h-1)。在L3/4或L4/5处放置硬膜外导管,用PIEB维持硬膜外镇痛;0.1%罗哌卡因加0.3 μg ml-1舒芬太尼,每60分钟10 ml。主要结局指标:主要结局是从DPE联合PIEB到分娩的最高水平的上感觉阻滞。结果:共接触143例产妇,120例随机分为三组,每组40例。三组在任何时间的最高感觉阻滞(P = 0.14)和上感觉阻滞(P = 0.27)均无统计学差异。下感觉阻滞(P = 0.20)和骶骨阻滞(P = 0.84)组间无差异。然而,分娩麻醉后的最高视觉模拟疼痛评分(>.3)在三组之间有统计学差异(P = 0.023)。分娩镇痛满意度组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.006)。其他次要结局无差异。结论:360ml h-1的DPE与pib递送并不比240ml h-1或120ml h-1产生更高的感觉阻滞水平。然而,在次要结局中,高速分娩确实比低速分娩提供了更有效的分娩镇痛和更高的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different bolus delivery speeds of a programmed intermittent epidural bolus combined with dural puncture epidural block during labour analgesia: A randomised controlled study.

Background: Dural puncture epidural block (DPE) with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) delivery provides effective analgesia for labour pain; however, it poses a risk of a high level of block.

Objective: To investigate the effect different pump speeds for a PIEB on maternal sensory block after DPE.

Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study.

Setting: An Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital, China, from June 2023 to December 2023.

Participants: Labour analgesia was administered to 120 nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy during the first stage of labour.

Intervention: After DPE insertion, women using labour analgesia were randomly allocated into a low-speed group (120 ml h -1 ), a medium-speed group (240 ml h -1 ) or a high-speed group (360 ml h -1 ). Epidural catheters were placed at L3/4 or L4/5, and epidural analgesia was maintained with a PIEB; 10 ml every 60 min using 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 μg ml -1 sufentanil.

Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was the highest level of upper sensory block from administering DPE combined with PIEB until delivery.

Results: A total of 143 parturients were approached and 120 were randomised to three groups of 40. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups at any time in either the highest sensory block ( P  = 0.14) or the upper sensory block ( P  = 0.27). Lower sensory ( P  = 0.20) and sacral blocks ( P  = 0.84) did not differ between groups. Nevertheless, the highest visual analogue pain scores (> 3) after labour anaesthesia was statistically different between the three groups ( P  = 0.023). Satisfaction with labour analgesia was significantly different between groups ( P  = 0.006). No differences in other secondary outcomes were noted.

Conclusion: DPE with PIEB delivery of 360 ml h -1 did not produce higher sensory block levels than either 240 ml h -1 or 120 ml h -1 . However, in secondary outcomes, the high speed delivery did provide more effective labour analgesia and higher satisfaction than low speed delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信