IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Glory O Apantaku, Lydia Kapiriri, Ole F Norheim, Ingrid Cardoso Couto de Azevedo, Dan Kim, Martin Hensher, Jaithri Ananthapavan, Anand Bhopal, Andrea J MacNeill, Jodi D Sherman, Craig Mitton
{"title":"Priority Setting in the Context of Planetary Healthcare.","authors":"Glory O Apantaku, Lydia Kapiriri, Ole F Norheim, Ingrid Cardoso Couto de Azevedo, Dan Kim, Martin Hensher, Jaithri Ananthapavan, Anand Bhopal, Andrea J MacNeill, Jodi D Sherman, Craig Mitton","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00980-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The realities of ecosystem breakdown and climate change pose a significant threat to the health of individuals around the world, disproportionately affecting poor and vulnerable populations. Every sector in society, including healthcare, needs to be engaged in the tremendous collective effort and transformational change needed to limit global warming. We see priority setting as having a key role to play in reallocating existing budgets within healthcare systems whilst at the same time being used to facilitate sustainable and more efficient resource allocation across countries. Priority setting looks to fairly distribute resources with the goal of improving patient and population health outcomes. However, these goals can be broadened to include consideration of environmental impact based on our understanding of the necessity of emissions reduction to address the climate crisis and promote population health. In this paper, we introduce key concepts of priority setting and identify the interplay between priority setting and the realities of resource scarcity in the realm of planetary healthcare. We propose that applying priority-setting principles could serve at least three goals; (1) protect and improve health outcomes; (2) limit unnecessary and marginal care; and (3) facilitate a just transition to a sustainable healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00980-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态系统崩溃和气候变化的现实对世界各地个人的健康构成重大威胁,对贫困和脆弱人口的影响尤为严重。包括医疗保健在内的社会每个部门都需要参与限制全球变暖所需的巨大集体努力和转型变革。我们认为,确定优先事项在卫生保健系统内重新分配现有预算方面可发挥关键作用,同时可用于促进各国之间可持续和更有效的资源分配。确定优先事项旨在公平分配资源,以改善患者和人口健康结果为目标。然而,这些目标可以扩大,根据我们对减少排放以解决气候危机和促进人口健康的必要性的理解,包括考虑环境影响。在本文中,我们介绍了优先设置的关键概念,并确定优先设置与地球卫生保健领域资源稀缺现实之间的相互作用。我们建议,应用确定优先次序的原则至少可以实现三个目标;(1)保护和改善健康结果;(2)限制不必要的和边缘性的护理;(3)促进向可持续医疗体系的公正过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Priority Setting in the Context of Planetary Healthcare.

The realities of ecosystem breakdown and climate change pose a significant threat to the health of individuals around the world, disproportionately affecting poor and vulnerable populations. Every sector in society, including healthcare, needs to be engaged in the tremendous collective effort and transformational change needed to limit global warming. We see priority setting as having a key role to play in reallocating existing budgets within healthcare systems whilst at the same time being used to facilitate sustainable and more efficient resource allocation across countries. Priority setting looks to fairly distribute resources with the goal of improving patient and population health outcomes. However, these goals can be broadened to include consideration of environmental impact based on our understanding of the necessity of emissions reduction to address the climate crisis and promote population health. In this paper, we introduce key concepts of priority setting and identify the interplay between priority setting and the realities of resource scarcity in the realm of planetary healthcare. We propose that applying priority-setting principles could serve at least three goals; (1) protect and improve health outcomes; (2) limit unnecessary and marginal care; and (3) facilitate a just transition to a sustainable healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信