从怀疑认知能力下降到痴呆症诊断:对医疗保健专业人员的考虑和态度的系统回顾。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Fleur C W Visser, Marleen Kloppenburg-Lagendijk, Liesbeth Hempenius, Nicolaas A Verwey, Marieke Perry, Marlise E A van Eersel, Barbara C van Munster
{"title":"从怀疑认知能力下降到痴呆症诊断:对医疗保健专业人员的考虑和态度的系统回顾。","authors":"Fleur C W Visser, Marleen Kloppenburg-Lagendijk, Liesbeth Hempenius, Nicolaas A Verwey, Marieke Perry, Marlise E A van Eersel, Barbara C van Munster","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initiating diagnostic testing for dementia is a dynamic and complex process that often involves balancing competing interests. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes during the process from suspicion of cognitive decline to deciding to initiate diagnostic testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were systematically searched on 29 January 2024 for qualitative and mixed-methods studies published since 2005. Search concepts were: 'dementia', 'considerations and attitudes', 'healthcare professionals' and 'diagnosis'. Two screeners independently conducted title/abstract-screening using ASReview (efficient and transparent systematic review machine learning framework), and full-text screening. Findings were analysed by thematic synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were included. Most involved primary care physicians (n = 25), primary care nurses (n = 1) or a combination (n = 7). The overarching phenomenon was that starting the diagnostic workup for dementia is a delicate process. Clusters influencing this process were: complexities arising from the nature of dementia; interaction with the patient and family; individual determinants of primary care practitioners (PCPs); expectations regarding the consequences of a diagnosis; factors related to the healthcare system; and societal factors. Together these clusters form PCPs' strategies and actions for deciding whether to start the diagnostic workup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initiating the diagnostic workup for dementia is a delicate process influenced by various factors including fear, reluctance and stigma. The different strategies that PCPs use cannot be captured by a single right approach. Recommendations to better support PCPs in navigating this complex process include ensuring consistent communication and clarity about their roles, and promoting interprofessional collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From suspicion of cognitive decline to dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes.\",\"authors\":\"Fleur C W Visser, Marleen Kloppenburg-Lagendijk, Liesbeth Hempenius, Nicolaas A Verwey, Marieke Perry, Marlise E A van Eersel, Barbara C van Munster\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initiating diagnostic testing for dementia is a dynamic and complex process that often involves balancing competing interests. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes during the process from suspicion of cognitive decline to deciding to initiate diagnostic testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were systematically searched on 29 January 2024 for qualitative and mixed-methods studies published since 2005. Search concepts were: 'dementia', 'considerations and attitudes', 'healthcare professionals' and 'diagnosis'. Two screeners independently conducted title/abstract-screening using ASReview (efficient and transparent systematic review machine learning framework), and full-text screening. Findings were analysed by thematic synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were included. Most involved primary care physicians (n = 25), primary care nurses (n = 1) or a combination (n = 7). The overarching phenomenon was that starting the diagnostic workup for dementia is a delicate process. Clusters influencing this process were: complexities arising from the nature of dementia; interaction with the patient and family; individual determinants of primary care practitioners (PCPs); expectations regarding the consequences of a diagnosis; factors related to the healthcare system; and societal factors. Together these clusters form PCPs' strategies and actions for deciding whether to start the diagnostic workup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initiating the diagnostic workup for dementia is a delicate process influenced by various factors including fear, reluctance and stigma. The different strategies that PCPs use cannot be captured by a single right approach. Recommendations to better support PCPs in navigating this complex process include ensuring consistent communication and clarity about their roles, and promoting interprofessional collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206097/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf176\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:启动痴呆的诊断测试是一个动态和复杂的过程,往往涉及平衡竞争利益。本系统综述的目的是提供一个概述的医疗保健专业人员的考虑和态度的过程中,从怀疑认知能力下降,决定启动诊断测试。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL和PsychINFO数据库,检索2005年以来发表的定性和混合方法研究。搜索概念是:“痴呆症”、“考虑和态度”、“医疗专业人员”和“诊断”。两名筛选者使用ASReview(高效透明的系统审查机器学习框架)和全文筛选独立进行标题/摘要筛选。通过专题综合分析调查结果。结果:纳入33项研究。主要涉及初级保健医生(n = 25)、初级保健护士(n = 1)或两者的组合(n = 7)。最重要的现象是,开始对痴呆症进行诊断检查是一个微妙的过程。影响这一过程的集群是:痴呆症性质引起的复杂性;与病人及家属的互动;初级保健从业人员(pcp)的个体决定因素;对诊断结果的期望;与卫生保健系统有关的因素;还有社会因素。这些集群共同构成了pcp决定是否启动诊断检查的策略和行动。结论:启动痴呆的诊断检查是一个微妙的过程,受恐惧、不情愿和耻辱感等多种因素的影响。pcp使用的不同策略不能通过单一的正确方法来捕获。关于更好地支持pcp驾驭这一复杂过程的建议包括确保其角色的一致沟通和清晰度,以及促进专业间合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From suspicion of cognitive decline to dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes.

Background: Initiating diagnostic testing for dementia is a dynamic and complex process that often involves balancing competing interests. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes during the process from suspicion of cognitive decline to deciding to initiate diagnostic testing.

Methods: Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were systematically searched on 29 January 2024 for qualitative and mixed-methods studies published since 2005. Search concepts were: 'dementia', 'considerations and attitudes', 'healthcare professionals' and 'diagnosis'. Two screeners independently conducted title/abstract-screening using ASReview (efficient and transparent systematic review machine learning framework), and full-text screening. Findings were analysed by thematic synthesis.

Results: Thirty-three studies were included. Most involved primary care physicians (n = 25), primary care nurses (n = 1) or a combination (n = 7). The overarching phenomenon was that starting the diagnostic workup for dementia is a delicate process. Clusters influencing this process were: complexities arising from the nature of dementia; interaction with the patient and family; individual determinants of primary care practitioners (PCPs); expectations regarding the consequences of a diagnosis; factors related to the healthcare system; and societal factors. Together these clusters form PCPs' strategies and actions for deciding whether to start the diagnostic workup.

Conclusion: Initiating the diagnostic workup for dementia is a delicate process influenced by various factors including fear, reluctance and stigma. The different strategies that PCPs use cannot be captured by a single right approach. Recommendations to better support PCPs in navigating this complex process include ensuring consistent communication and clarity about their roles, and promoting interprofessional collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信