在保护性农业中,扎垄补偿作物残茬的清除

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Abel Saldivia-Tejeda, Nele Verhulst, Simon Fonteyne
{"title":"在保护性农业中,扎垄补偿作物残茬的清除","authors":"Abel Saldivia-Tejeda,&nbsp;Nele Verhulst,&nbsp;Simon Fonteyne","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil cover with crop residues can increase soil health and water availability, leading to improved production under dryland conditions, but crop residues can be in high demand as animal fodder. In a 21-year-long experiment in central Mexico, we compared the yield and profitability of wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) and maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) on conventional tilled beds to permanent beds with varying residue levels and evaluated whether tied ridges could offset the negative effects of residue removal. The maize and wheat grain yields from permanent beds with full residue retention were 2.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (30%) and 0.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (13%) greater, respectively, than the yields from conventional tilled beds. Permanent beds with full residue retention increased yields by over 10% compared to beds with partial retention, while partial residue retention with tied ridges achieved similar yields to full retention. Adding tied ridges to permanent beds without residues increased yields by 20%. Yield stability did not differ among treatments. Permanent beds with full residue retention generated six times higher net income compared with beds with conventional tillage, while the treatment that involved removing all residues and adding tied ridges doubled the profit generated by the treatment using full residue retention. Overall, permanent beds with partial residue retention improve yields, and tied ridges could mitigate some of the adverse effects of partial residue removal, making partial retention with tied ridges a more profitable system, contingent on the residue market.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tied ridges compensate for crop residue removal in conservation agriculture\",\"authors\":\"Abel Saldivia-Tejeda,&nbsp;Nele Verhulst,&nbsp;Simon Fonteyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Soil cover with crop residues can increase soil health and water availability, leading to improved production under dryland conditions, but crop residues can be in high demand as animal fodder. In a 21-year-long experiment in central Mexico, we compared the yield and profitability of wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) and maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) on conventional tilled beds to permanent beds with varying residue levels and evaluated whether tied ridges could offset the negative effects of residue removal. The maize and wheat grain yields from permanent beds with full residue retention were 2.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (30%) and 0.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (13%) greater, respectively, than the yields from conventional tilled beds. Permanent beds with full residue retention increased yields by over 10% compared to beds with partial retention, while partial residue retention with tied ridges achieved similar yields to full retention. Adding tied ridges to permanent beds without residues increased yields by 20%. Yield stability did not differ among treatments. Permanent beds with full residue retention generated six times higher net income compared with beds with conventional tillage, while the treatment that involved removing all residues and adding tied ridges doubled the profit generated by the treatment using full residue retention. Overall, permanent beds with partial residue retention improve yields, and tied ridges could mitigate some of the adverse effects of partial residue removal, making partial retention with tied ridges a more profitable system, contingent on the residue market.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70106\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70106\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作物残茬覆盖土壤可以增加土壤健康和水分供应,从而提高旱地条件下的产量,但作物残茬作为动物饲料的需求量很大。在一项为期21年的墨西哥中部试验中,我们比较了常规耕作床和不同残留水平的永久耕作床上小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)和玉米(Zea mays L.)的产量和盈利能力,并评估了捆绑垄沟是否可以抵消残留去除的负面影响。与常规耕作床相比,完全保留秸秆的永久耕作床的玉米和小麦产量分别高出2.1 Mg ha - 1(30%)和0.5 Mg ha - 1(13%)。与部分残留相比,完全残留的永久床的产量提高了10%以上,而部分残留与捆绑垄的产量与完全残留相似。在没有残留物的永久床上添加捆扎的垄,产量增加了20%。不同处理间产量稳定性无差异。与传统耕作相比,完全保留残留物的永久耕作床产生的净收入是传统耕作床的六倍,而清除所有残留物并添加捆绑垄沟的处理产生的利润是完全保留残留物处理的两倍。总的来说,部分残留的永久床提高了产量,而捆绑垄沟可以减轻部分残留去除的一些不利影响,使部分残留的捆绑垄沟成为一个更有利可图的系统,取决于残留物市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tied ridges compensate for crop residue removal in conservation agriculture

Tied ridges compensate for crop residue removal in conservation agriculture

Tied ridges compensate for crop residue removal in conservation agriculture

Tied ridges compensate for crop residue removal in conservation agriculture

Tied ridges compensate for crop residue removal in conservation agriculture

Soil cover with crop residues can increase soil health and water availability, leading to improved production under dryland conditions, but crop residues can be in high demand as animal fodder. In a 21-year-long experiment in central Mexico, we compared the yield and profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) on conventional tilled beds to permanent beds with varying residue levels and evaluated whether tied ridges could offset the negative effects of residue removal. The maize and wheat grain yields from permanent beds with full residue retention were 2.1 Mg ha−1 (30%) and 0.5 Mg ha−1 (13%) greater, respectively, than the yields from conventional tilled beds. Permanent beds with full residue retention increased yields by over 10% compared to beds with partial retention, while partial residue retention with tied ridges achieved similar yields to full retention. Adding tied ridges to permanent beds without residues increased yields by 20%. Yield stability did not differ among treatments. Permanent beds with full residue retention generated six times higher net income compared with beds with conventional tillage, while the treatment that involved removing all residues and adding tied ridges doubled the profit generated by the treatment using full residue retention. Overall, permanent beds with partial residue retention improve yields, and tied ridges could mitigate some of the adverse effects of partial residue removal, making partial retention with tied ridges a more profitable system, contingent on the residue market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信