Dariusz Zapała, Paweł Augustynowicz, Paulina Droździel, Paulina Iwanowicz
{"title":"运动相关感觉意象创造和回忆过程中脑振荡模式的差异","authors":"Dariusz Zapała, Paweł Augustynowicz, Paulina Droździel, Paulina Iwanowicz","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Motor imagery (MI) engages higher cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and the transformation of sensory information in various ways, depending on the current goal. MI can be used to reproduce in the mind a possibly exact copy of an earlier motor experience (isomorphic motor imagery [IMI]) or to transform earlier experiences into new mental representations (transmorphic motor imagery [TMI]). Our study aimed to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns of brain oscillations that can distinguish these two types of MI focused on differences in the frontal midline theta (FMΘ), central parietal beta (CPβ), and sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). Twenty subjects (14F; 18–25 years) participated in the study. Experimental stimuli were generated using a haptic interface to stimulate force feedback during hand clamping. The subjects had to squeeze the interface handle, memorizing the sensations associated with this movement. Then, they mentally reproduced the action they had just performed (IMI) or imagined stronger/weaker sensations (TMI). The study findings demonstrate significant differences in FMΘ and CPβ oscillation activity when comparing IMI and TMI. The IMI condition exhibits similar brain rhythm activity to working memory, probably due to its function of reproducing a previous motor experience. In contrast, oscillation patterns during TMI resemble introspective activity typical of multimodal sensory transformations. Additionally, we observed differences in the parietal delta and theta, in line with prior research on actual movement. Results may suggest that controlling movement kinematic parameters is critical when MI replicates sensory experiences, whereas creating new representations from experiences may require less stringent control.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Brain Oscillation Patterns During Motor-Related Sensory Imagery Creation and Recall\",\"authors\":\"Dariusz Zapała, Paweł Augustynowicz, Paulina Droździel, Paulina Iwanowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.70159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Motor imagery (MI) engages higher cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and the transformation of sensory information in various ways, depending on the current goal. MI can be used to reproduce in the mind a possibly exact copy of an earlier motor experience (isomorphic motor imagery [IMI]) or to transform earlier experiences into new mental representations (transmorphic motor imagery [TMI]). Our study aimed to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns of brain oscillations that can distinguish these two types of MI focused on differences in the frontal midline theta (FMΘ), central parietal beta (CPβ), and sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). Twenty subjects (14F; 18–25 years) participated in the study. Experimental stimuli were generated using a haptic interface to stimulate force feedback during hand clamping. The subjects had to squeeze the interface handle, memorizing the sensations associated with this movement. Then, they mentally reproduced the action they had just performed (IMI) or imagined stronger/weaker sensations (TMI). The study findings demonstrate significant differences in FMΘ and CPβ oscillation activity when comparing IMI and TMI. The IMI condition exhibits similar brain rhythm activity to working memory, probably due to its function of reproducing a previous motor experience. In contrast, oscillation patterns during TMI resemble introspective activity typical of multimodal sensory transformations. Additionally, we observed differences in the parietal delta and theta, in line with prior research on actual movement. Results may suggest that controlling movement kinematic parameters is critical when MI replicates sensory experiences, whereas creating new representations from experiences may require less stringent control.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"61 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in Brain Oscillation Patterns During Motor-Related Sensory Imagery Creation and Recall
Motor imagery (MI) engages higher cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and the transformation of sensory information in various ways, depending on the current goal. MI can be used to reproduce in the mind a possibly exact copy of an earlier motor experience (isomorphic motor imagery [IMI]) or to transform earlier experiences into new mental representations (transmorphic motor imagery [TMI]). Our study aimed to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns of brain oscillations that can distinguish these two types of MI focused on differences in the frontal midline theta (FMΘ), central parietal beta (CPβ), and sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). Twenty subjects (14F; 18–25 years) participated in the study. Experimental stimuli were generated using a haptic interface to stimulate force feedback during hand clamping. The subjects had to squeeze the interface handle, memorizing the sensations associated with this movement. Then, they mentally reproduced the action they had just performed (IMI) or imagined stronger/weaker sensations (TMI). The study findings demonstrate significant differences in FMΘ and CPβ oscillation activity when comparing IMI and TMI. The IMI condition exhibits similar brain rhythm activity to working memory, probably due to its function of reproducing a previous motor experience. In contrast, oscillation patterns during TMI resemble introspective activity typical of multimodal sensory transformations. Additionally, we observed differences in the parietal delta and theta, in line with prior research on actual movement. Results may suggest that controlling movement kinematic parameters is critical when MI replicates sensory experiences, whereas creating new representations from experiences may require less stringent control.
期刊介绍:
EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.