活细胞中蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用定量方法的进展

IF 2.2 4区 化学
Soojung Yi, Yejin Ahn, Nam Ki Lee
{"title":"活细胞中蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用定量方法的进展","authors":"Soojung Yi,&nbsp;Yejin Ahn,&nbsp;Nam Ki Lee","doi":"10.1002/bkcs.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) occur in most cellular processes, and characterizing PPIs is essential for understanding biological function and regulation. One of the most important parameters is the dissociation constant (<i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>), which reflects the strength of PPIs. A range of in vitro methods, including isothermal titration calorimetry, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), surface plasmon resonance, and single-molecule fluorescence assays, have been developed to determine <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> values under controlled conditions. However, the living cell environment differs markedly from dilute buffer systems due to macromolecular crowding, compartmentalization, and regulatory complexity, often leading to discrepancies between in vitro and in-cell <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> values. In mammalian cells, advances in fluorescence-based techniques, including fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-FRET and fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy, have enabled quantitative measurements of PPI affinity in living systems. In contrast, accurately measuring <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> in bacterial cells has remained a challenge. Recently, in-cell NMR and quantitative FRET approaches have been developed for measuring <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> in bacterial cells. This review highlights the principles, capabilities, and limitations of representative in-cell <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> measurement techniques and provides guidance for selecting appropriate approaches to quantitatively characterize PPIs in physiologically relevant contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54252,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society","volume":"46 6","pages":"574-586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bkcs.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in methodologies for quantifying protein–protein interactions in living cells\",\"authors\":\"Soojung Yi,&nbsp;Yejin Ahn,&nbsp;Nam Ki Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bkcs.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) occur in most cellular processes, and characterizing PPIs is essential for understanding biological function and regulation. One of the most important parameters is the dissociation constant (<i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>), which reflects the strength of PPIs. A range of in vitro methods, including isothermal titration calorimetry, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), surface plasmon resonance, and single-molecule fluorescence assays, have been developed to determine <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> values under controlled conditions. However, the living cell environment differs markedly from dilute buffer systems due to macromolecular crowding, compartmentalization, and regulatory complexity, often leading to discrepancies between in vitro and in-cell <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> values. In mammalian cells, advances in fluorescence-based techniques, including fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-FRET and fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy, have enabled quantitative measurements of PPI affinity in living systems. In contrast, accurately measuring <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> in bacterial cells has remained a challenge. Recently, in-cell NMR and quantitative FRET approaches have been developed for measuring <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> in bacterial cells. This review highlights the principles, capabilities, and limitations of representative in-cell <i>K</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> measurement techniques and provides guidance for selecting appropriate approaches to quantitatively characterize PPIs in physiologically relevant contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"574-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bkcs.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bkcs.70028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bkcs.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPIs)发生在大多数细胞过程中,表征PPIs对于理解生物功能和调控至关重要。其中最重要的参数是解离常数(Kd),它反映了质子泵抑制剂的强度。一系列体外方法,包括等温滴定量热法、荧光共振能量转移(FRET)、表面等离子体共振和单分子荧光测定,已经开发出在受控条件下测定Kd值的方法。然而,由于大分子拥挤、区隔化和调控复杂性,活细胞环境与稀释缓冲系统明显不同,这往往导致体外和细胞内Kd值之间的差异。在哺乳动物细胞中,荧光技术的进步,包括荧光寿命成像显微镜(fret)和荧光相互关联光谱,已经能够定量测量生命系统中PPI的亲和力。相比之下,准确测量细菌细胞中的Kd仍然是一个挑战。最近,细胞内核磁共振和定量FRET方法已经发展用于测量细菌细胞中的Kd。这篇综述强调了具有代表性的细胞内Kd测量技术的原理、能力和局限性,并为在生理相关背景下选择适当的方法来定量表征PPIs提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advances in methodologies for quantifying protein–protein interactions in living cells

Advances in methodologies for quantifying protein–protein interactions in living cells

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) occur in most cellular processes, and characterizing PPIs is essential for understanding biological function and regulation. One of the most important parameters is the dissociation constant (Kd), which reflects the strength of PPIs. A range of in vitro methods, including isothermal titration calorimetry, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), surface plasmon resonance, and single-molecule fluorescence assays, have been developed to determine Kd values under controlled conditions. However, the living cell environment differs markedly from dilute buffer systems due to macromolecular crowding, compartmentalization, and regulatory complexity, often leading to discrepancies between in vitro and in-cell Kd values. In mammalian cells, advances in fluorescence-based techniques, including fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-FRET and fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy, have enabled quantitative measurements of PPI affinity in living systems. In contrast, accurately measuring Kd in bacterial cells has remained a challenge. Recently, in-cell NMR and quantitative FRET approaches have been developed for measuring Kd in bacterial cells. This review highlights the principles, capabilities, and limitations of representative in-cell Kd measurement techniques and provides guidance for selecting appropriate approaches to quantitatively characterize PPIs in physiologically relevant contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society Chemistry-General Chemistry
自引率
23.50%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society is an official research journal of the Korean Chemical Society. It was founded in 1980 and reaches out to the chemical community worldwide. It is strictly peer-reviewed and welcomes Accounts, Communications, Articles, and Notes written in English. The scope of the journal covers all major areas of chemistry: analytical chemistry, electrochemistry, industrial chemistry, inorganic chemistry, life-science chemistry, macromolecular chemistry, organic synthesis, non-synthetic organic chemistry, physical chemistry, and materials chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信