阅读障碍:身份、标签及其在全纳教育中的地位

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Cathryn Knight
{"title":"阅读障碍:身份、标签及其在全纳教育中的地位","authors":"Cathryn Knight","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the role of dyslexia identification within the broader shift toward inclusive education. While dyslexia is widely recognised as a neurobiological condition, ongoing debates question its validity, diagnostic criteria, and the fairness of access to support. Additionally, research presents conflicting findings on the impact of the dyslexia label on an individual's self-perception and academic outlook, with some studies highlighting its benefits in providing clarity and access to resources, while others suggest it may lower expectations and reinforce a deficit perspective. As countries increasingly prioritise inclusive education, the necessity of labelling students with dyslexia may be called into question. Inclusive education frameworks advocate for universal high-quality teaching practices without the need for formal diagnoses. However, education systems still rely on categorical diagnoses to determine access to specialist support, creating tensions between inclusive education ideals and traditional special education models. This article examines these tensions and argues for a fundamental shift in both mindset and practice – moving away from targeted provisions for those identified with dyslexia toward learning environments that are designed to accommodate and support all students.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"52 2","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dyslexia: Identity, labelling and its place in inclusive education\",\"authors\":\"Cathryn Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8578.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article explores the role of dyslexia identification within the broader shift toward inclusive education. While dyslexia is widely recognised as a neurobiological condition, ongoing debates question its validity, diagnostic criteria, and the fairness of access to support. Additionally, research presents conflicting findings on the impact of the dyslexia label on an individual's self-perception and academic outlook, with some studies highlighting its benefits in providing clarity and access to resources, while others suggest it may lower expectations and reinforce a deficit perspective. As countries increasingly prioritise inclusive education, the necessity of labelling students with dyslexia may be called into question. Inclusive education frameworks advocate for universal high-quality teaching practices without the need for formal diagnoses. However, education systems still rely on categorical diagnoses to determine access to specialist support, creating tensions between inclusive education ideals and traditional special education models. This article examines these tensions and argues for a fundamental shift in both mindset and practice – moving away from targeted provisions for those identified with dyslexia toward learning environments that are designed to accommodate and support all students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"251-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.70028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.70028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了阅读障碍识别在更广泛的包容性教育转变中的作用。虽然阅读障碍被广泛认为是一种神经生物学疾病,但持续的争论质疑其有效性、诊断标准和获得支持的公平性。此外,关于阅读障碍标签对个人自我认知和学术前景的影响,研究提出了相互矛盾的发现,一些研究强调了它在提供清晰和获取资源方面的好处,而另一些研究则认为它可能会降低期望并强化缺陷观点。随着各国越来越重视全纳教育,给学生贴上阅读障碍标签的必要性可能会受到质疑。全纳教育框架提倡普及高质量的教学实践,而不需要正式诊断。然而,教育系统仍然依赖于分类诊断来确定获得专家支持的机会,这在全纳教育理想和传统特殊教育模式之间造成了紧张关系。这篇文章探讨了这些矛盾,并提出了在思维和实践上的根本转变——从为那些有阅读障碍的人提供针对性的规定转向为所有学生提供适应和支持的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dyslexia: Identity, labelling and its place in inclusive education

Dyslexia: Identity, labelling and its place in inclusive education

Dyslexia: Identity, labelling and its place in inclusive education

Dyslexia: Identity, labelling and its place in inclusive education

This article explores the role of dyslexia identification within the broader shift toward inclusive education. While dyslexia is widely recognised as a neurobiological condition, ongoing debates question its validity, diagnostic criteria, and the fairness of access to support. Additionally, research presents conflicting findings on the impact of the dyslexia label on an individual's self-perception and academic outlook, with some studies highlighting its benefits in providing clarity and access to resources, while others suggest it may lower expectations and reinforce a deficit perspective. As countries increasingly prioritise inclusive education, the necessity of labelling students with dyslexia may be called into question. Inclusive education frameworks advocate for universal high-quality teaching practices without the need for formal diagnoses. However, education systems still rely on categorical diagnoses to determine access to specialist support, creating tensions between inclusive education ideals and traditional special education models. This article examines these tensions and argues for a fundamental shift in both mindset and practice – moving away from targeted provisions for those identified with dyslexia toward learning environments that are designed to accommodate and support all students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信