{"title":"对“评估大西洋中部沿海土壤盐度检测的常规农艺土壤试验”的更正","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pokhrel, S., Blew, W., Miller, J. O., & Shober, A. L. (2025). Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the mid-Atlantic. <i>Soil Science Society of America Journal</i>, <i>89</i>(3), e70075. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70075</p><p>We apologize for the error and any confusion it may have caused.</p><p>In the third paragraph of Section 3.4, “Relationships between Mehlich-3 and ammonium acetate SCR vs SAR” in the Results and Discussion section, “The relationship between ESP<sub>SAR</sub> and SCR<sub>M3</sub> was strong (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .84; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil), SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87; <i>p</i> < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil), and SCR<sub>M3</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .83, <i>p</i> < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong” was incorrect, and this should have read “The relationship between ESP<sub>SAR</sub> and SCR<sub>M3</sub> was strong (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil), SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87; <i>p</i> < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil), and SCR<sub>M3</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87, <i>p</i> < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong.”</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to “Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the Mid-Atlantic”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.70097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pokhrel, S., Blew, W., Miller, J. O., & Shober, A. L. (2025). Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the mid-Atlantic. <i>Soil Science Society of America Journal</i>, <i>89</i>(3), e70075. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70075</p><p>We apologize for the error and any confusion it may have caused.</p><p>In the third paragraph of Section 3.4, “Relationships between Mehlich-3 and ammonium acetate SCR vs SAR” in the Results and Discussion section, “The relationship between ESP<sub>SAR</sub> and SCR<sub>M3</sub> was strong (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .84; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil), SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87; <i>p</i> < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil), and SCR<sub>M3</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .83, <i>p</i> < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong” was incorrect, and this should have read “The relationship between ESP<sub>SAR</sub> and SCR<sub>M3</sub> was strong (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCR<sub>AA(acid)</sub> for acidic soil), SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87; <i>p</i> < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCR<sub>AA(alkaline)</sub> for alkaline soil), and SCR<sub>M3</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .87, <i>p</i> < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong.”</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"89 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70097\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction to “Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the Mid-Atlantic”
Pokhrel, S., Blew, W., Miller, J. O., & Shober, A. L. (2025). Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the mid-Atlantic. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 89(3), e70075. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70075
We apologize for the error and any confusion it may have caused.
In the third paragraph of Section 3.4, “Relationships between Mehlich-3 and ammonium acetate SCR vs SAR” in the Results and Discussion section, “The relationship between ESPSAR and SCRM3 was strong (r2 = .84; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil (r2 = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil), SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil (r2 = .87; p < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil), and SCRM3 (r2 = .83, p < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong” was incorrect, and this should have read “The relationship between ESPSAR and SCRM3 was strong (r2 = .87; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil (r2 = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil), SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil (r2 = .87; p < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil), and SCRM3 (r2 = .87, p < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong.”
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
