能否从雨水排放中预测城市化带来的地貌变化?

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Lukman A. Soboyejo, Kathryn L. Russell, Tim D. Fletcher
{"title":"能否从雨水排放中预测城市化带来的地貌变化?","authors":"Lukman A. Soboyejo,&nbsp;Kathryn L. Russell,&nbsp;Tim D. Fletcher","doi":"10.1002/esp.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stormwater drainage is a primary pathway through which urbanisation degrades physical channel form and ecologically relevant in-stream attributes, such as the presence of large wood. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding methods or study designs that effectively isolate the specific effect of stormwater from those of catchment context, geology and other geomorphic controls. This study examines how stream geomorphology, characterised through variables such as bankfull cross-sectional area, pool-to-riffle spacing and large wood, relates to stormwater drainage inputs from urban areas. To achieve this, we employed historical data reviews, GIS techniques and field observations to assess morphological changes along a stream channel (Toomuc Creek, Melbourne, Australia), focusing on the differences between upstream and downstream of stormwater inputs. We hypothesised that: (i) stream bankfull cross-sectional area increases with catchment urbanisation and (ii) significant differences in geomorphic response variables exist between upstream and downstream of stormwater outfalls. However, contrary to our expectations, stream bankfull cross-sectional area did not follow a systematic downstream increase with catchment urbanisation, largely due to historical land-use practices (e.g. vegetation clearing) and channel stabilisation interventions (e.g. grade control structures, rock lining). Nonetheless, some outfall locations did show clear evidence of disturbance, confirming that widening, deepening and a combination of both occur locally and in a spatially discontinuous manner. These findings highlight two key directions for future research. Firstly, to properly isolate urban influences on stream geomorphic adjustments, controlled study designs should prioritise sites with minimal historical disturbance and no hardpoint interventions. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the influence of past channel corridor management and channel evolution on contemporary geomorphic responses needs to be specifically studied in urban settings. Understanding the complex interplay between urbanisation, channel geomorphology, historical land-use and in-stream features is vital for developing more accurate predictive models to mitigate urban stormwater impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"50 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.70087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can changes in geomorphic responses to urbanisation be predicted from stormwater outfalls?\",\"authors\":\"Lukman A. Soboyejo,&nbsp;Kathryn L. Russell,&nbsp;Tim D. Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/esp.70087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stormwater drainage is a primary pathway through which urbanisation degrades physical channel form and ecologically relevant in-stream attributes, such as the presence of large wood. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding methods or study designs that effectively isolate the specific effect of stormwater from those of catchment context, geology and other geomorphic controls. This study examines how stream geomorphology, characterised through variables such as bankfull cross-sectional area, pool-to-riffle spacing and large wood, relates to stormwater drainage inputs from urban areas. To achieve this, we employed historical data reviews, GIS techniques and field observations to assess morphological changes along a stream channel (Toomuc Creek, Melbourne, Australia), focusing on the differences between upstream and downstream of stormwater inputs. We hypothesised that: (i) stream bankfull cross-sectional area increases with catchment urbanisation and (ii) significant differences in geomorphic response variables exist between upstream and downstream of stormwater outfalls. However, contrary to our expectations, stream bankfull cross-sectional area did not follow a systematic downstream increase with catchment urbanisation, largely due to historical land-use practices (e.g. vegetation clearing) and channel stabilisation interventions (e.g. grade control structures, rock lining). Nonetheless, some outfall locations did show clear evidence of disturbance, confirming that widening, deepening and a combination of both occur locally and in a spatially discontinuous manner. These findings highlight two key directions for future research. Firstly, to properly isolate urban influences on stream geomorphic adjustments, controlled study designs should prioritise sites with minimal historical disturbance and no hardpoint interventions. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the influence of past channel corridor management and channel evolution on contemporary geomorphic responses needs to be specifically studied in urban settings. Understanding the complex interplay between urbanisation, channel geomorphology, historical land-use and in-stream features is vital for developing more accurate predictive models to mitigate urban stormwater impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.70087\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70087\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雨水排水是城市化导致河道形态和河流生态相关属性(如大片树木的存在)退化的主要途径。然而,文献中关于有效地将雨水的特定影响与集水区环境、地质和其他地貌控制因素隔离开来的方法或研究设计存在空白。该研究考察了河流地貌如何通过诸如河岸横截面积、池与沟间距和大木材等变量来表征,与城市地区的雨水排放输入有关。为了实现这一目标,我们采用历史数据回顾、GIS技术和实地观测来评估河流通道(澳大利亚墨尔本的Toomuc Creek)的形态变化,重点关注雨水输入的上游和下游之间的差异。我们假设:(i)河堤横截面积随着集水区城市化而增加;(ii)雨水出水口上游和下游的地貌响应变量存在显著差异。然而,与我们的预期相反,河流两岸的横截面积并没有随着流域城市化而系统性地增加,这主要是由于历史上的土地利用实践(如植被清理)和渠道稳定干预(如坡度控制结构、岩石衬砌)。尽管如此,一些排水口位置确实显示出明显的扰动证据,证实了扩大、加深和两者的结合在局部和空间上以不连续的方式发生。这些发现突出了未来研究的两个关键方向。首先,为了适当隔离城市对河流地貌调整的影响,控制性研究设计应优先考虑历史干扰最小且无挂载点干预的地点。其次,或许更重要的是,需要在城市环境中具体研究过去河道走廊管理和河道演变对当代地貌响应的影响。了解城市化、河道地貌、历史土地利用和河流特征之间复杂的相互作用,对于开发更准确的预测模型以减轻城市雨水影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can changes in geomorphic responses to urbanisation be predicted from stormwater outfalls?

Can changes in geomorphic responses to urbanisation be predicted from stormwater outfalls?

Stormwater drainage is a primary pathway through which urbanisation degrades physical channel form and ecologically relevant in-stream attributes, such as the presence of large wood. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding methods or study designs that effectively isolate the specific effect of stormwater from those of catchment context, geology and other geomorphic controls. This study examines how stream geomorphology, characterised through variables such as bankfull cross-sectional area, pool-to-riffle spacing and large wood, relates to stormwater drainage inputs from urban areas. To achieve this, we employed historical data reviews, GIS techniques and field observations to assess morphological changes along a stream channel (Toomuc Creek, Melbourne, Australia), focusing on the differences between upstream and downstream of stormwater inputs. We hypothesised that: (i) stream bankfull cross-sectional area increases with catchment urbanisation and (ii) significant differences in geomorphic response variables exist between upstream and downstream of stormwater outfalls. However, contrary to our expectations, stream bankfull cross-sectional area did not follow a systematic downstream increase with catchment urbanisation, largely due to historical land-use practices (e.g. vegetation clearing) and channel stabilisation interventions (e.g. grade control structures, rock lining). Nonetheless, some outfall locations did show clear evidence of disturbance, confirming that widening, deepening and a combination of both occur locally and in a spatially discontinuous manner. These findings highlight two key directions for future research. Firstly, to properly isolate urban influences on stream geomorphic adjustments, controlled study designs should prioritise sites with minimal historical disturbance and no hardpoint interventions. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the influence of past channel corridor management and channel evolution on contemporary geomorphic responses needs to be specifically studied in urban settings. Understanding the complex interplay between urbanisation, channel geomorphology, historical land-use and in-stream features is vital for developing more accurate predictive models to mitigate urban stormwater impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信